UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities

S
e
curities Exchange ActA
c
t of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  
                             Filed by a party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to
Section 240.14a-12

SLM Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

No fee required.required
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(1) and0-11
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2)Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)

Amount previously paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing party:

(4)

Date Filed:

0-11


LOGO

 

300 Continental Drive


Newark, Delaware 19713

April 27, 2023

LOGO

LOGO
  300 Continental Drive
Newark, Delaware 19713

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

We executed on our strategic imperatives and grew our core business in 2022 –increasing originations, expanding net interest margin, returning a significant amount of capital to shareholders, and rigorously managing expenses

LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMANin an uncertain macroeconomic environment. While credit performance remains a focus, the overall strength of our franchise and investments in our processes, programs, and people position us to deliver continued shareholder value and long-term success.

OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

May 5, 2020

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

As the premier brand for college and continuous education,We’re charting an ambitious course at Sallie Mae builds prosperous futures by providing access, planning outcomes,as the market leader for private student lending, but our mission and purpose is much greater. We’re an education solutions company, helping students and families responsibly fund their future. Educationnavigate to, through, and immediately after college.

I’m pleased we’ve already hit the ground running in 2023, and we are seeing positive outcomes and momentum on multiple fronts. We expect the private student lending market to return to a more normalized growth rate, our originations engine is the foundationstrong, and prepayment speeds continue to slow, which bodes well for successbalance sheet growth or continued loan sales. The acquisition of Nitro College, a digital marketing and the proven pathwayeducation solutions company, has further jumpstarted our efforts to economic mobility. We are proud to serve the 456,000reach more students and families who selected us last year as they invested in their future through education.and expand our Education Services lines of business.

This year, like many other organizations, we have needed to change the way we work, socialize,We’re also deepening our relationships with Historically Black Colleges and live our daily lives in the face of theCOVID-19 crisis. Our team has shown an extraordinary adaptability in the face of this ever-changing landscape. In particular, I want to recognize those employees whoUniversities (HBCUs) and continue to serveoffer our own scholarship programs to help students from all backgrounds access and complete higher education. Our Bridging the Dream Scholarship Program, in partnership with Thurgood Marshall College Fund, is part of the three-year, $3 million commitment to open the doors of higher education to students from underserved communities. To date, 600 scholarships totaling $2 million have been awarded.

This work, along with our commitment to the environment and strong risk controls and governance, is highlighted in our Environmental, Social, and Governance Report published in April 2023 and available at www.salliemae.com/esg.

We understand we cannot deliver for our customers develop new solutionswithout also delivering for our stockholders. Our investment thesis remains simple: we seek to ensure the health(i) provide attractive growth through a focus on market share and safety of our employees, keep our facilities safe,operating leverage, (ii) expertly allocate and keep our business running smoothly throughout this global pandemic.

return capital to stockholders, and (iii) manage risk. We continue to take tangible actionsalign the interest of our team members with this long-term valuation orientation.

I look forward to position our franchise for long-term success, including focusing our resources on key growth opportunities, providing high-quality private student loans, and offering competitive financing for grad school.

In addition, we remain committed to these values every day ofyou joining me at the year: Connect, Thrive, Do Right, Dare to Do, and Make a Difference. Sallie Mae’s efforts to live these values are highlighted in our inaugural Corporate Social Responsibility report that was published in March 2020 and available on our website.

Finally, I am pleased to introduce Jonathan W. Witter, our new Chief Executive Officer. Jon is an industry veteran bringing nearly three decades of executive leadership, banking expertise, and operational management to Sallie Mae. He is a strategic leader with a demonstrated ability to improvetop- and bottom-line performance, while enhancing customer experience. Most recently, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer of Hilton, where he oversaw the company’s global brands, marketing, loyalty and partnerships, IT, and strategy teams. Prior to his role at Hilton, Jon held leadership positions at Capital One, Morgan Stanley, and Wachovia.

Our Board and management team are confident that Jon is ideally suited to lead Sallie Mae, and under his leadership, we will continue to perform and deliver on our long-term growth plans.

Please join us for the SLM Corporation (“Sallie Mae”) 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) on Thursday,Tuesday, June 18, 2020,20, 2023, at 11:00 a.m.1 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time to be held virtually via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020.SLM2023.

Details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting and how to participate at the meeting are provided in the attached Notice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement. You are being asked to vote on a number of important matters. Your vote is important, regardless of the number of shares you own, and all holders of our Common Stock are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote at your earliest convenience by following the instructions in the Notice of Availability of Proxy Materials or the proxy card you received in the mail.

Thank you for your continued support ofand confidence in Sallie Mae.

Sincerely,All best,

 

LOGO

Raymond J. QuinlanLOGO

ChairmanJonathan W. Witter

Chief Executive Officer

2023 PROXY STATEMENT


Notice of the Board2023

Annual Meeting of Directors

Stockholders


LOGO

NOTICE OF 2020 ANNUAL MEETINGLOGO

OF STOCKHOLDERSItems of Business:

 

DateTimePlace

Thursday

June 18, 2020

LOGO
 

11:00 a.m.PROPOSAL 1—

Eastern Daylight Time

Meeting live via the Internet – please visit:

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020

Items of Business:

Proposal 1—Elect 12 directors nominated by the Sallie Mae Board of Directors (“Board(the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”), each for aone-year term, to serve until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

LOGO

ProposalPROPOSAL 2—

Approve, on an advisory basis, Sallie Mae’s executive compensation;

LOGO

PROPOSAL 3—

Approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on Sallie Mae’s executive compensation;

LOGO

Proposal 3—PROPOSAL 4—

Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020;2023; and

LOGO

Other Business—OTHER BUSINESS—

Transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

2023 Virtual Annual Stockholder Meeting

After careful consideration, the Board of Directors has determined to hold a virtual annual meeting in order to facilitate stockholder attendance and participation by enabling stockholders to participate from any location and at no cost. We believe this is the right choice for Sallie Mae at this time, as it enables engagement with our stockholders, regardless of size, resources, or physical location. We are committed to ensuring that stockholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting, including submitting questions. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit questions during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2023. To participate in the virtual meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction form. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. We encourage you to log in and access the meeting at least 15 minutes prior to the start time.

Record Date:

Stockholders of record of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $.20 per share (“Common Stock”), as of the close of business on April 21, 2020,2023, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. On April 21, 2020, 375,096,4582023, 242,378,966 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted.

How to Vote:

Your participation in the Annual Meeting is important. Sallie Mae urges you to take the time to read carefully the proposals described in the proxy statement and vote your proxy at your earliest convenience.

You may vote one of the following ways:

LOGO

By Telephone

1-800-690-6903

LOGO

By Internet before the meeting

www.proxyvote.com

LOGO

By Mail

completing and signing the proxy card enclosed and returning it in the envelope provided

LOGO

By Internet during the meeting

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020

By order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGO

LOGO

Richard M. Nelson

Corporate Secretary

May 5, 2020


TABLEOF CONTENTSApril 27, 2023

 

2023 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Table of Contents

 

LOGO


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATIONLOGO



LOGO

 

    

300 Continental Drive

Newark, Delaware 19713

LOGO

300 Continental Drive

Newark, Delaware 19713


The Board of Directors of SLM Corporation (“Sallie Mae,” “SLM,” the “Company,” “we,” “our”“our,” or “us”) is furnishing this proxy statement to solicit proxies for use at Sallie Mae’s 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). A copy of the Notice of the Annual Meeting accompanies this proxy statement. This proxy statement is being sent or made available, as applicable, to our stockholders beginning on or about May 5, 2020. In light of the coronavirus(COVID-19), for the safety and well-being of our stockholders, and taking into account the protocols of local, state and federal governments, we4, 2023. We have determined that the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only (with noin-person meeting), via the Internet, atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020SLM2023. For more information regarding the Annual Meeting process, please review the section entitled “Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting” contained at the end of this proxy statement.

The proxy statement and Sallie Mae’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022 (the “2019 “2022 Form 10-K”) are available at:https://www.salliemae.com/investors/shareholder-information andhttps://materials.proxyvote.com. You may also obtain these materials at the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) website atwww.sec.gov or by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices, located at 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713. Sallie Mae will provide a copy of the 20192022 Form10-K without charge to any stockholder upon written request.

OVERVIEW OF PROPOSALSProxy Statement Summary

This summary highlights certain information contained in the proxy statement. You should read the entire proxy statement and the 2022 Form 10-K carefully before you vote.

SLM’s Strategy

To further focus our business and increase shareholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our focus remains on maximizing the profitability and growth of our core private student loan business, while harnessing and optimizing the power of our brand and attractive client base. In addition, we continue to seek to better inform the external narrative about student lending and Sallie Mae. We also strive to maintain a rigorous and predictable capital allocation and return program to create shareholder value. We are focused on driving a mission-led culture that continues to make Sallie Mae a great place to work. We also continue to strengthen our risk and compliance function, enhance and build upon our risk management framework, and assess and monitor enterprise-wide risk.

We work to maximize the revenue of our core private student loan business by (i) driving penetration at all schools, (ii) increasing market share by fully meeting student funding needs, (iii) using enhanced risk-adjusted pricing and underwriting, and (iv) improving our marketing, digital, and data capabilities. In addition, we work to manage our unit costs by (a) employing a strong fixed cost discipline, (b) driving towards reducing both the unit costs of servicing and the unit cost of acquisitions, and (c) improving third-party vendor cost management.

On March 4, 2022, we completed the acquisition of the assets of Nitro College, which provides resources that help students and families evaluate how to responsibly pay for college and manage their financial responsibilities after graduation. The addition of Nitro College brought innovative products, tools, and resources to help students and families confidently navigate their higher education journey.

The acquisition of Nitro College enhances future strategic growth opportunities for Sallie Mae and expands our digital marketing capabilities, reduces the cost to acquire customer accounts, and accelerates our progress to become a broader education solutions provider helping students to, through, and immediately after college.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        1


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

We strive to optimize the value of our brand and attractive client base by (i) building products and services that leverage our customer affiliation, (ii) ensuring products and services are consistent with our core mission and drive customer value, (iii) prioritizing partnerships and other capital efficient avenues of growth, and (iv) looking for opportunities to optimize the return on our investment.

In 2022, we worked to maintain a rigorous capital allocation and return program by (i) paying quarterly Common Stock dividends of $0.11 per share, (ii) selling approximately $3 billion of private education loans during the year, and (iii) repurchasing 40 million shares of our Common Stock under Rule 10b5-1 trading plans authorized under our share repurchase programs.

Corporate Governance Highlights

We believe that strong corporate governance is critical for our success. To this end, we have established robust governance structures including (i) separating the roles of Board Chair and CEO, (ii) focusing on director independence as our Board of Directors is comprised of 92% independent directors, and (iii) continuing our commitment to diversity among our Board of Directors, with 50% of our directors self-identifying as diverse, as disclosed further below in the NASDAQ Board Diversity Matrix. In addition, we are focused on Environmental, Social, and Governance practices, as disclosed further below in the “Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices” section in this proxy statement.

Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation philosophy has generally aligned the compensation received by our namedexecutive officers with the Company’s performance. Our performance-based compensation programs focus our senior executives on goals that drive our financial performance while balancing risk and reward. Although the Company’s total shareholder return (as described below) has been positive over the last three years, payouts under our 2022 annual incentive plan were lower as compared to the prior year’s payouts because the Company’s performance in 2022 was not as strong as in 2021. While we achieved many significant Company successes in 2022, we did not deliver on certain key Company performance metrics during the year, such as charge-offs and earnings per share. For more information on our executive compensation including our practices and philosophy, please see our Compensation Discussion & Analysis on page 30.

2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

LOGO

2        SLM CORPORATION


Overview of Proposals

This proxy statement contains threefour proposals requiring stockholder action, each of which is discussed in more detail below. Proposal 1 seeks the election of 12 directors nominated by the Board of Directors. Proposal 2 seeks approval, on an advisory basis, of Sallie Mae’s executive compensation. Proposal 3 seeks approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future advisory votes on Sallie Mae’s executive compensation. Proposal 4 seeks ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.2023. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal or, in the case of the election of directors, on each nominee.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    1


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONOF DIRECTORSLOGO

 

    

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of Proposals 1, 2, and 4 and that you vote 1 YEAR for Proposal 3, as discussed in more detail below.

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Sallie Mae

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        3


Proposal 1

Election of Directors

Our Board of Directors has nominated and recommends 12 individuals for election to our Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. These individuals are as follows:

 

Paul G. Child

Marianne M. Keler

Frank C. Puleo

Robert S. Strong

Mary Carter Warren Franke

Mark L. Lavelle

Vivian C. Schneck-Last

Jonathan W. Witter

Earl A. Goode

Jim Matheson

William N. Shiebler

Kirsten O. Wolberg

LOGO

Under our Certificate of Incorporation, the size of our Board of Directors may not be fewer than 11 nor more than 16 members. Under ourBy-Laws, the Board of Directors has the authority to determine the size of the Board of Directors within that range and to fill any vacancies that may arise prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders. The Board of Directors has set the number of members at 12.

Biographical information, qualifications, and experience with respect to each director nominee appear below. In addition to fulfilling the general criteria for director nominees described in the section titled “Nominations Process,” each nominee possesses experience, skills, attributes, and other qualifications the Board of Directors has determined support its oversight and management of Sallie Mae’s business, operations, and structure. These qualifications are discussed below, along with biographical information regarding each director nominee, including each individual’s age, principal occupation, and business experience during the past five years. Information concerning each director nominee is based in part on information received from the respective director nominee and in part from Sallie Mae’s records.

All nominees appearing below have consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve if elected. Should any nominee subsequently decline or be unable to accept such nomination to serve as a director, the Board

of Directors may designate a substitute nominee or the persons voting the shares represented by proxies solicited hereby may vote such shares for a reduced number of nominees. If the Board of Directors designates a substitute nominee, persons named as proxies will vote“FOR” that substitute nominee.

OurBy-Laws provide the election of a director in an uncontested election will be by a majority of the votes cast with respect to a nominee at a meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote for each nominee. A director nominee will be elected to the Board of Directors if the number of shares voted“FOR” the nominee exceeds the number of votes cast“AGAINST” the nominee’s election. Abstentions and shares not voted on the proposal, including brokernon-votes, are of no effect.

If any director nominee fails to receive a majority of the votes cast“FOR” his or her election, such nominee will automatically tender his or her resignation upon certification of the election results. The Nominations and Governance and Compensation Committee (the “NGC Committee”) of the Board of Directors will make a recommendation to the Board of Directors on whether to accept or reject such nominee’s resignation. The Board of Directors will act on the NGCNominations and Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of certification of the election results.

 

2    4        SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONPROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS DIRECTORS

 

Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

    

R. Scott Blackley    (Independent)

Chief Transformation Officer, Oscar Health, Inc.

Qualifications:

Mr. Blackley brings decades of experience in financial services, risk management, strategy, and operations to the Board of Directors.

Age: 54

Director Since:

November 2022

Professional Highlights:

•  Chief Transformation Officer, Oscar Health, Inc.—2022 to Present; Chief Financial Officer—2021 to 2022

•  Chief Financial Officer, Capital One Financial Corporation—2016 to 2021; Controller and Principal Accounting Officer—2011 to 2017

•  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Capital Markets business, Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)—2007 to 2011; Senior Vice President, Accounting Policy—2005 to 2007

•  Vice President, Assistant Controller, America Online, Inc.—2003 to 2005

•  Partner, KPMG, LLP—2002 to 2003

•  Professional Accounting Fellow, United States Securities and Exchange Commission— 2000 to 2002

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2022 to present

•  Director and Budget Chair, Trout Unlimited—2019 to present

•  Director, Hexamer Therapeutics—2019 to present

LOGO

Paul G. Child    (Independent/Audit Committee Chair)

 

PAUL G. CHILD

Former Office Managing Partner, Salt Lake City, Deloitte LLP

(Independent)

(Lead Director)

 

Qualifications:

Mr. Child’s leadership roles and experience in the accounting field enable him to bring to the Board of Directors experience in the areas of finance, accounting, financial services, and capital markets.

Age: 74

Director Since:

April 2014

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Office Managing Partner, Salt Lake City, Deloitte LLP—1995 to 2008; Professional Practice Director, Salt Lake City—1989 to 1995; Audit Partner—1983 to 2008; various positions—1971 to 1983

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2009 to present

•  Member, Board of Governors, Salt Lake Chamber of Commerce—2002 to 2008

•  Director, Mountainwest Capital Network—2002 to 2008

•  Director, United Way of Greater Salt Lake—2001 to 2008

•  Director, Ballet West—2000 to 2008

•  Director, Pioneer Theater—2000 to 2006

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        5


PROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

 

Mary Carter Warren Franke    (Independent/Board Chair)

Former Managing

Director, Head of

Corporate Marketing,

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Age: 66

Director Since:

April 2014

Qualifications: Mr. Child’s

Ms. Franke’s leadership roles and experience in marketing and the accounting fieldbanking industry enable himher to bringcontribute to the Board of Directors experience in the areas of finance, accounting,marketing, business development, and financial services, and capital markets.services.

Age: 71

Director since:April 2014

 

MARY CARTER

WARREN FRANKE

Former Managing Director, Head of Corporate Marketing, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(Independent)

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Managing Director, Head of Corporate Marketing, JPMorgan Chase & Co.—2007 to 2013

•  Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, Chase Card Services—1995 to 2007

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2014 to present

•  Director, Investors Management Corporation—2021 to present

•  Director, The Warfield Fund—2007 to present

•  Director, Saint Mary’s School—2014 to present2020

•  Director, Hobe Sound Community Chest—2017 to present

•  Director, Paul’s Place—2014 to 2017

 

Qualifications: Ms. Franke’s leadership roles and experience in marketing and the banking industry enable her to contribute to the Board of Directors experience in the areas of marketing, business development, and financial services.

Age: 63

Director since:April 2014

LOGO

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    3


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS

    

 

Marianne M. Keler    (Independent/Nominations and Governance                                         Committee Chair)

 

EARL A. GOODE

Chief of Staff to the Governor of Indiana

(Independent)

(Strategic Planning CommitteeCo-Char)Attorney, Keler & Kershow PLLC

 

Professional Highlights:Qualifications:

 

•  Chief of Staff toMs. Keler’s legal background and experience in the Governor of Indiana—2006 to 2013; 2017 to present

•  President, Indianapolis Capital Improvement Board of Managers—2015 to 2016

•  Deputy Chief of Staff to the Governor of Indiana—2006

•  Commissioner, Department of Administration, State of Indiana—2005 to 2006

•  Chairman, Indiana Sports Corporation—2001 to 2006

•  President, GTE Information Servicesstudent loan industry and GTE Directories Company—1994 to 2000; President, GTE Telephone Operations North and East—1990 to 1994; President, GTE Telephone Company of the Southwest—1988 to 1990

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

•  Director,with Sallie Mae Bank—2013 to present

•  Member and Former Chairman, Georgetown College Board of Trustees—2006 to present

•  Member, Marion County Capitol Improvement Board—2019 to present

•  Member and Executive Committee, Indianapolis Championship Fund— 2018 to present

Qualifications: Mr. Goode has held several leadership positions in business services and operations. This experience, combined with his involvement in the state political process, enables him to contributebring valuable perspective to the Board of Directors in the areas of marketingstudent and product development, business operations,consumer lending, legal and politicalcorporate governance, and government affairs.higher education.

Age: 79

Director since:July 2000

4    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS

 

MARIANNE M. KELER

Attorney, Keler & Kershow PLLCAge: 68

 

(Independent)Director Since:

April 2014

 

(Audit Committee Chair)

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Attorney, Keler & Kershow PLLC—2006 to present

•  Executive Vice President, Consumer Finance, Corporate Strategy & Administration, Sallie Mae—2004 to 2006

•  Senior Vice President & General Counsel, Sallie Mae; President, Student Loan Marketing Association—1997 to 2004

•  Vice President & Associate General Counsel, Student Loan Marketing Association—1990 to 1997; various other positions—1985 to 1997

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2010 to present

•  Board Chair, Building Hope (charter school lender)—2004 to present2020

•  Board Chair, Institute for American Universities—College of the Mediterranean—2018 to present

•  Finance Committee Chair, Institute for American Universities—2008 to 2016;present; trustee since 2007

•  Board Chair, American University in Bulgaria,Bulgaria—2008 to 2014; trustee since 2001

•  Finance Committee Chair, EL Haynes Charter School—2008School Board of Directors—2006 to 20142012

•  Member, Georgetown University Board of Regents—2009 to 2015

•  Founding Director, National Student Clearinghouse—1993 to 2009

 

Directorship of other public companies:

 

•  CubeSmart (NYSE: CUBE)—2007 to present;

2022; Board Chair—2018 to present2022

6        SLM CORPORATION


PROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

Mark L. Lavelle    (Independent/Compensation Committee Chair)

Chief Executive Officer, Maergo

 

Qualifications:

 

Qualifications: Ms. Keler’s legal backgroundMr. Lavelle’s extensive experience developing and experience in the student loan industryscaling businesses encompassing financial services, commerce, and with Sallie Mae bringinformation technology allows him to provide valuable perspectiveinsight to the Board of Directors in the areas of studentrisk management, strategy, acquisitions, and consumer lending, legal and corporate governance, and higher education.business operations.

Age: 65

Director since:April 2014

 

MARK L. LAVELLE

Former Senior Vice President, Commerce Cloud, Adobe Inc.Age: 57

 

(Independent)Director Since:

April 2019

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Chief Executive Officer, Maergo (formerly known as X Delivery)—2021 to present

•  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Deep Lake Capital—2021 to present

•  Senior Vice President, Commerce Cloud, Adobe Inc.—2018 to 2019

•  Chief Executive Officer, Magento Commerce—2015 to 2018

•  Senior Vice President, Product, eBay Enterprise Enterprise—2013 to 2015

•  Senior Vice President, Strategy and Partnerships, eBay, Inc.—2012 to 2013

•  Senior Vice President, Strategy and Business Development, PayPal, Inc.—2009 to 2012

•  Co-Founder and Vice President, Corporate Development, Bill Me Later, Inc.—2001 to 2009

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2019 to present

•  Director, Armada Inc—2018 to present

•  Director, Second Chance—2008 to present

LOGO

 

Ted Manvitz    (Independent)

Managing Director, Grain Management

Qualifications:

Mr. Lavelle’sManvitz’s extensive experience developingin the areas of strategic planning and scaling businesses encompassing financial services, commerce,investments, capital allocation, senior executive management, operations, finance, mergers and information technologyacquisitions, and capital markets allows him to provide valuable insight to the Board of Directors in the areas of risk management, strategy, acquisitions,driving growth, building partnerships, and business operations.creating value.

Age: 51

 

Age: 54Director Since:

March 2021

 

Director since:April 2019

 

Professional Highlights:

•  Managing Director, Grain Management—2022 to present

•  Interim Chief Financial Officer, Optimus Ride—2021

•  Senior Advisor IHS Holding Limited—2019 to 2021; Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer—2018 to 2019; Chief Financial Officer—2016 to 2018; Chief Investment Officer—2013 to 2016; Chief Operating Officer—2011 to 2013; Executive Director, Corporate Finance and M&A—2010 to 2011

•  Managing Director, Arm Capital Partners—2009 to 2010

•  Executive Director, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.—2006 to 2009; Vice President—2004 to 2006; Associate Vice President—2002 to 2004

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2021 to present

•  Director, Alares—2022 to present

•  Senior Advisor, Africell—2021 to present

•  Adjunct Faculty, American University—2020 to present

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    52023 PROXY STATEMENT        7


PROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS

LOGO

    

 

Jim Matheson    (Independent)

 

JIM MATHESON

Chief Executive Officer, NRECA

(Independent)

 

Qualifications:

Mr. Matheson’s extensive experience in public policy and financial services enables him to bring to the Board of Directors a valuable perspective in development of business strategies and on public policy and regulatory matters.

Age: 63

Director Since:

March 2015

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Chief Executive Officer, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association—2016 to present

•  Principal in the Public Policy Practice, Squire Patton Boggs—2015 to 2016

•  Member of the United States House of Representatives—2001 to 2015

•  Founder of The Matheson Group—1999 to 2000

•  Consultant, Energy Strategies, Inc.—1991 to 1998

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2015 to present

•  Service on the United States House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee—2007 to 2015; Science Committee—2001 to 2011; Financial Services Committee—2003 to 2007; and Transportation and Infrastructure Committee—2001 to 2007

•  Chief Deputy Whip for the Democratic Caucus of the United States House of Representatives—2011 to 2015

•  Board Member, United States Association of Former Members of Congress—2015 to present2022

LOGO

Samuel T. Ramsey    (Independent)

•  Director, United States Global Leadership Coalition—2019 to present

Former Chief Risk Officer, Chase, the consumer and small business organization within JP Morgan Chase & Co.

 

Qualifications:

 

Qualifications:Mr. Matheson’s extensiveRamsey brings more than 30 years of experience in public policyconsumer and financial services enables him to bringcommercial banking, with expertise in risk management, finance, treasury, and the capital markets, to the Board of Directors a valuable perspective in development of business strategies and on public policy and regulatory matters.Directors.

 

Age: 60

Director since:March 2015

 

FRANK C. PULEO

AttorneyAge: 63

 

(Independent)Director Since:

November 2021

 

(Risk Committee Chair)

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Attorney—Chief Risk Officer, Chase, the consumer and small business organization within JP Morgan Chase & Co.—2011 to 2014

•  Chief Risk Officer, Ally Financial Inc.—2007 to 2010

•  Chief Financial Officer, Global Corporate and Investment Banking, Bank of America—2006 to 20162007

•  Co-Chair,Enterprise Credit and Market Risk Executive, Chief Risk Executive for Global Finance Group, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, a law firm—1995 to 2006; Partner—1978Consumer and Small Business Banking, Enterprise Operational and Market Risk Executive, Bank of America—2004 to 2006

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—20132021 to present

•  Director, South Street Securities Holdings Inc. (f/k/a CMET Finance)—2008 to present

•  Director, Syncora Guaranty, Inc.—Chair of Audit Committee, member of the Compliance and Finance Committees, Ditech Holding Corporation—2018 to present2019

•  Director, Syncora Capital Assurance, Inc.—2009 to 2017

•  Director, CIFC Corporation—2006 to 2014

Directorships of other public companies:

•  Apollo Investment Corporation—2007 to present

Qualifications: Mr. Puleo’s background as a corporate and finance attorney enables him to bring analytical, legal, and financial insight to the Board of Directors in the areas of financial services, capital markets transactions, and corporate governance.

Age: 74

Director since:March 2008

 

6    

8        SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONPROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

    

Vivian C. Schneck-Last    (Independent/Operational and Compliance Risk Committee Chair)

 

VIVIAN C. SCHNECK-LAST

Former Managing Director,
Global Head of
Technology Governance, Goldman Sachs &
Company

(Independent)

Professional Highlights:

Managing Director, Global Head of Technology Governance, Goldman Sachs & Company—2009 to 2014

•  Managing Director, Global Head of Technology Business Development, Goldman Sachs & Company—2000 to 2014

•  Managing Director, Global Head of Technology Vendor Management, Goldman Sachs & Company—2003 to 2014Company

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:Age: 62

 

•  Director Sallie Mae Bank—2015 to presentSince:

•  Advisor/Director, Portrait Capital Systems, LLC—March 2015 to 2019

•  Advisor/ Director, Coronet—2015 to present

•  Director, Bikur Cholim of Manhattan—2014 to present

 

Directorships of other public companies:

•  SCVX—2020 to present

 

Qualifications:

 

Qualifications:Ms. Schneck-Last’s strategic technology experience and background in technology governance in the financial services field bring valuable perspective to the Board of Directors in risk management and on a broad range of enterprise technology matters.

Age: 59

Director since:March 2015

WILLIAM N. SHIEBLER

Private Investor

(Independent)

(NGC Committee Chair)

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Private Investor—2007 to present

•  Chief Executive Officer of the Americas, Deutsche Asset Management (Deutsche Bank)—2002 to 2007

•  President and Chief Executive Officer, Putnam Mutual Funds; Senior Managing Director, Putnam Investments—1990Global Head of Technology Governance, Goldman Sachs & Company—2009 to 19992014; Managing Director, Global Head of Technology Business Development—2000 to 2014; Managing Director, Global Head of Technology Vendor Management—2003 to 2014

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—20102015 to present

•  Trustee, Buffalo Bill CenterAdvisor/Director, Portrait Capital Systems, LLC—2015 to 2019

•  Advisor/Director, Coronet—2015 to present

•  Director, Bikur Cholim of the West in Cody, WY—2007Manhattan—2014 to present; Elected as Vice Chairman and Chairman Elect—2019; Chairman—2020present

 

Directorships of other public companies:

 

•  Calamos Asset Management, Inc.SCVX Corp.20122020 to 20172022

•  OXiGENE, Inc.—2002 to 2012

LOGO

Robert S. Strong    (Independent/Financial Risk Committee Chair)

•  MasTec Inc.—2001 to 2004

Former Managing Director, Chairman, Capital Commitments Committee, Bank of America Securities

Age: 74

Director Since:

April 2014

 

Qualifications:

 

Qualifications:Mr. Shiebler’sStrong’s extensive experience in the banking and financial services industry and with other public companiesindustries allows him to provide valuable insight to the Board of Directors in the areas of finance, risk management, portfolio management, and business operations.

 

Age: 78

Director since:April 2014

 

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    7


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS

ROBERT S. STRONG

Former Managing Director, Chairman, Capital
Commitments Committee,
Bank of America Securities

(Independent)

(Compliance Committee Chair)

(Preferred Stock Committee Chair)

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Managing Director, Chairman, Capital Commitments Committee, Bank of America Securities—2006 to 2007

2007; Managing Director, Portfolio Management, Bank of America Securities—Management—2001 to 2006

•  Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer, JP Morgan Chase Bank—1996 to 2001

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2014 to present

•  Director, Syncora Guaranty, Inc.—2018 to present2020

•  Director, Syncora Capital Assurance, Inc.—2009 to 2017

•  Member, Financial Policy Review Board for the State of New Jersey—2013 to 2016

•  Director, CamberLink Inc.—2013 to 2016

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        9


PROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

LOGO

 

Jonathan W. Witter    (Executive; Not Independent)

Chief Executive Officer, Sallie Mae

Qualifications:

Mr. Strong’sWitter’s extensive background and significant leadership experience in the banking industry and financial services industries allowshis customer experience expertise allow him to provide valuablebusiness and leadership insight to the Board of Directors in the areas of finance, risk management, portfolio management,banking, financial services, capital markets, business operations, and business operations.customer service.

Age: 71

Director since:April 2014

 

JONATHAN W. WITTER

Chief Executive Officer, Sallie MaeAge: 54

 

(Executive;Director Since:

Not Independent)April 2020

 

 

Professional Highlights:

 

•  Chief Executive Officer and Director, Sallie Mae—April 2020 to present

•  Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Officer, Hilton Worldwide Holdings—April 2017 to April 2020

•  President—Retail and Direct Banking, Capital One Financial Corporation—February 2012 to March 2017

2017; President—Retail and Small Business Banking, Capital One Financial Corporation—Banking—September 2011 to February 2012

2012; Executive Vice President—Retail Banking, Capital One Financial Corporation—Banking—December 2010 to September 2011

•  Chief Operating Officer—Retail Banking Group and President, Morgan Stanley Private Bank—2009 to December 2010

•  Executive Vice President and Head of General Bank Distribution, Wachovia (now Wells Fargo & Company)—2004 to 2009

 

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

 

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—April 2020 to present

Qualifications: Mr. Witter’s extensive background and significant leadership experience in the banking industry and his customer experience expertise allow him to provide business and leadership insight to the Board of Directors in the areas of banking, financial services, capital markets, business operations and customer service.

Age: 50

Director since:April 2020

 

LOGO

8    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS

    

 

Kirsten O. Wolberg    (Independent/Preferred Stock Committee Chair)

 

KIRSTEN O. WOLBERG

Chief Technology and
Operations Officer,
DocuSign

(Independent)

Professional Highlights:

Former Chief Technology and Operations Officer, DocuSign—2017 to present

•  Vice President, PayPal Separation Executive, PayPal, Inc.—2014 to 2017

•  Vice President, Technology, PayPal, Inc.—2012 to 2014

•  Chief Information Officer, Salesforce.com—2008 to 2011

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2016 to present

•  Vice President, Corporate Technology, Charles Schwab & Co.—2001 to 2008

•  Director, Year Up—2008 to present

•  Director, Jewish Vocational Services—2014 to present

Directorships of other public companies:

•  Silicon Graphics International Corp.—2016DocuSign

 

Qualifications:

 

Qualifications:Ms. Wolberg’s extensive experience in information technology for the financial services industry allows her to provide valuable insight to the Board of Directors in the areas of finance, information technology risks, cyber security, and business operations.

Age: 55

 

Age: 52Director Since:

November 2016

 

Director since:November 2016

 

Professional Highlights:

•  Chief Technology and Operations Officer, DocuSign—2017 to 2021

•  Vice President, PayPal Separation Executive, PayPal, Inc.—2014 to 2017

•  Vice President, Technology, PayPal, Inc.—2012 to 2014

•  Chief Information Officer, Salesforce.com—2008 to 2011

•  Vice President, Corporate Technology, Charles Schwab & Co.—2001 to 2008

Other Professional and Leadership Experience:

•  Director, Sallie Mae Bank—2016 to present

•  Director, Atlas —2023 to present

•  Director, Epidemic Sound-2021 to present

•  Director, Pryon-2021 to present

•  Director, Pie Insurance-2021 to present

•  Director, Duco Technology Limited—2020 to 2021

•  Director, Year Up—2008 to 2021

•  Director, Jewish Vocational Services—2014 to present

Directorships of other public companies:

•  Silicon Graphics International Corp.—2016

•  CalAmp Corp—2020 to present

•  Dynatrace, Inc.—2021 to present

10        SLM CORPORATION


PROPOSAL 1  |  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board of Directors Recommendation

LOGO

    

  

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF THE TWELVE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote “FOR”
the Election of the Twelve Nominees Named Above.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    9


PROPOSAL 2—ADVISORY VOTEON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

 

PROPOSAL

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        11


Proposal 2—ADVISORY VOTE ON

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONAdvisory Vote on

Executive Compensation

Sallie Mae is asking stockholders to approve an advisory resolution (commonly referred to as a“say-on-pay” resolution) on its executive compensation as reported in this proxy statement. Sallie Mae urges stockholders to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section (“CD&A”) of this proxy statement, which describes how our executive compensation policies and procedures operate and are designed to achieve our compensation objectives, as well as the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation of Sallie Mae’s named executive officers (“NEOs”).

At our annual meeting of stockholders held in June 2019,2022, we submitted anon-binding vote to our stockholders to approve our executive compensation. Approximately 96.098.6 percent of the stockholders voted in favor of thesay-on-pay proposal. We attribute that broad support in part to our continued efforts to understand and address the feedback we received from our stockholders. Specifically, in 2022 we continuecontinued to focus on performance-based compensation for our NEOs as we (i) tietied a significant portion of total NEO compensation to the achievement of performance goals that we believe drive the fundamentals of our business and (ii) awardawarded a greatersignificant percentage, 50 percent, of the NEO’s long-term incentive plan equity award (“LTIP”) equity awards in the form of performance-based awards consisting of performance stock units (“PSUs”). In 2019, as part of our plan to increase the percentage of compensation tied to performance, we increased the amount of PSUs awarded to NEOs under the LTIP from 25 percent to 50 percent.

The compensation awarded to our former Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Raymond J. Quinlan,Jonathan W. Witter, and other NEOs for 2019 recognizes2022 reflects the positive performanceexecution on our strategic priorities and core business in 2022, i.e., growing loan originations, expanding net interest margin, returning a significant amount of the Company.capital to stockholders, and rigorously managing expenses in an uncertain macroeconomic environment. The NGCCompensation Committee is mindful of its responsibility to align executive compensation with the overall performance of the Company, while taking into consideration the need to provide market competitive compensation in order to recruit and retain highly skilled and experienced executives. The CD&A provides a comprehensive discussion and rationale for the 20192022 pay decisions made by the NGCCompensation Committee and the correlation to Company performance.

As described in the CD&A, our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain, and motivate our NEOs, who are important to our long-term success. Under these programs, we provide our NEOs with appropriate objectives and incentives to achieve our business goals. We believe that our compensation features demonstrate our responsiveness to our stockholders, our commitment to ourpay-for-performance philosophy, and our goal of aligning management’s interests with those of our stockholders to support the creation of long-term value.

The Board of Directors has adopted a policy providing for annual“say-on-pay” advisory votes. In accordance with this policy and Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and as a matter of good corporate governance, Sallie Mae is asking stockholders to approve the following advisory resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“Resolved, that Sallie Mae’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the related compensation tables and narrative disclosure in this proxy statement.”

This proposal to approve the resolution regarding the compensation of Sallie Mae’s NEOs requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the Common Stock present or represented, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.thereon. Abstentions have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the matter. Shares not voted on the matter, including brokernon-votes, have no direct effect on the matter. This proposal is advisory in nature and, therefore, is not binding upon the NGCCompensation Committee or the Board of Directors. However, the NGCCompensation Committee will as it has done in the past, carefully evaluate the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions. Following our Annual Meeting, we expect to hold the next advisory say-on-pay vote at our 2024 annual meeting of our stockholders.

Board of Directors Recommendation

LOGO

    

  

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS AND THE RELATED COMPENSATION TABLES AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the Approval,
on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of our Named
Executive Officers, as Disclosed in the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis and the Related Compensation Tables and Narrative
Disclosure in this Proxy Statement.

 

10    

12        SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


Proposal 3—


Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATIONOFTHE APPOINTMENTOFTHE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMSection 14A of the Exchange Act also requires the Company to hold, at least once every six years, shareholder advisory votes on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. This proposal allows the Company’s stockholders to express their views on whether future advisory votes on executive compensation of the nature reflected in Proposal 2 should occur every one, two, or three years. Stockholders may specify “1 year”, as recommended by the Board of Directors, or “2 years” or “3 years” on the proxy card or voting instruction form or may abstain from voting on this proposal.

Historically, the Board of Directors has recommended stockholders hold an advisory vote on executive compensation each year. An annual vote provides stockholders with an opportunity to provide input on compensation decisions and allows the Board of Directors to promptly reevaluate compensation policies and practices and reflect on stockholder feedback. This is also the preferred approach by many investors and institutional shareholder advisory service firms. For these reasons, the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.

The vote is advisory and not binding upon the Company and its Board of Directors. However, the Board of Directors values your opinion and will consider your vote when making future decisions on the frequency of the advisory vote. Notwithstanding the Board of Directors’ recommendation and the outcome of the stockholder vote, the Board of Directors may in the future decide to conduct advisory votes on a more or less frequent basis and may vary its practice based on factors such as discussions with stockholders and the adoption of material changes to compensation programs. Following our Annual Meeting, we expect to hold the next advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation at our 2029 annual meeting of our stockholders.

This proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the Common Stock present or represented, and entitled to vote thereon. Abstentions will not be counted as votes cast “FOR” any of the frequency choices but will be counted as present or represented for determining whether any option receives a majority vote. If none of the options receive a majority vote, the option that receives the highest number of votes cast will be considered to be the frequency selected by stockholders. However, because this is only an advisory vote, the Board of Directors may decide that it is in the best interests of the stockholders and the Company to hold the say-on-pay vote more or less frequently than the option selected by the stockholders.

Board of Directors Recommendation

LOGO

The Board of Directors recommends a vote For the
Option of “1 YEAR” as the Preferred Frequency for
Advisory votes on Executive Compensation.

 

 

PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM2023 PROXY STATEMENT        13


Proposal 4—

Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), is selected by the Audit Committee of Sallie Mae’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”). The Audit Committee has engaged KPMG as Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020.2023. Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, and they will have the opportunity to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders and to make a statement if they desire to do so.

This proposal is put before the stockholders because the Board of Directors believes it is a good corporate governance practice to provide stockholders a vote on ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm.

For ratification, this proposal will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the shares of Common Stock present or represented, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.thereon. Abstentions have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the matter. Shares not voted on the matter including brokernon-votes, have no direct effect on the matter. If the appointment of KPMG is not ratified, the Audit Committee will evaluate the basis for the stockholders’ vote when determining whether to continue the firm’s engagement. Even if the selection of Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm is ratified, the Audit Committee may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during 20202023 if, in its discretion, it determines such a change would be in the Company’s best interests.

Board of Directors Recommendation

LOGO

    

  

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTEFORRATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OFThe Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR”
Ratification of the Appointment of
KPMG AS SALLIE MAE’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2020.

as Sallie
Mae’s Independent registered public accounting Firm for 2023.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    11


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE14        SLM CORPORATION


Corporate Governance

Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors believes strong corporate governance is critical to achieving Sallie Mae’s performance goals and to maintaining the trust and confidence of investors, employees, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders.

The primary responsibilities of the Board of Directors are to:

 

Reviewreview Sallie Mae’s long-term strategies and set long-term performance metrics;

 

Reviewreview risks affecting Sallie Mae and its processes for managing those risks, and oversee assignment of various aspects of risk management, compliance, and governance;

 

Select,select, evaluate, and compensate the CEO and our NEOs;

 

Planplan for succession of the CEO and members of the executive management team;

 

Reviewreview and approve Sallie Mae’s annual business plan and multi-year strategic plan, and periodically review performance against such plans;

 

Reviewreview and approve major transactions and business initiatives;

 

Throughthrough its Audit Committee, select and oversee Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm;

 

Recommendrecommend director candidates for election by stockholders; and

 

Evaluateevaluate its own effectiveness.

Board Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors’ Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) are reviewed each year by the NGCNominations and Governance Committee, which from time to time will recommend changes to the Board of Directors. The Guidelines are published atwww.salliemae.com under “For Investors,”www.salliemae.com/investors/corporate-governance/ and a written copy may be obtained by contacting the Corporate Secretary atcorporatesecretary@salliemae.com orSLM Corporation, 300 Continental Drive, Newark, DE 19713.19713. The Guidelines, along with Sallie Mae’sBy-Laws, embody the following governance practices, among others:

 

A majority of the members of the Board of Directors must be independent directors, and all members of the (i) Audit, (ii) Nominations and NGCGovernance, and (iii) Compensation Committees must be independent.

 

All directors stand forre-election each year. Directors are elected under a majority vote standard in uncontested elections.

All directors stand for re-election each year. Directors are elected under a majority vote standard in uncontested elections.

 

We have historically combined the roles of Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO; however, as set forth in greater detail in the Section titled “Board Leadership Structure,” as of April 19, 2020, we have separated the role of Chairman of the Board of DirectorsChair from CEO, and anticipate maintaining this separation going forward.CEO. We alsodo not have a Lead Independent Director elected bygiven the independence of our Board of Directors.Chair.

 

Each regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting concludesmay conclude with an executive session in which only members of the Board of Directors participate. Each regularly scheduled committee meeting also generally concludes with an executive session presided over by the committee Chair.

 

We seek representation on the Board of Directors that reflects a diversity of geography, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, age, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

We maintain stock ownership and retention guidelines for directors and executive officers.

 

The Board of Directors and its committees conduct performance reviews annually.undertake an annual review to evaluate their effectiveness.

 

TheDirectors should not serve on more than three other public company boards in addition to the Company’s Board of Directors and its committees may engage their own advisors.Directors.

Non-employee directors are to retire no later than at the annual meeting of stockholders following such director’s 75th birthday.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Leadership Structure

On April 19, 2020, in connection with the appointment of Mr. Witter as the Company’s CEO, the Board of Directors adopted a structure separating the ChairmanMs. Franke, an independent director of the Board of Directors from the CEO, which was initially reported in our Form8-K filed on March 5, 2020. Currently, Mr. Quinlan, the Company’s former CEO, serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors (as well as the Chairman of theCompany and Sallie

12    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Mae Bank, our wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Bank”) Board of Directors) and will serve in this role until June 18, 2020, at which time Mr. Quinlan will no longer serve on the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors will appoint one of the Company’s independent directors then in service to serve, serves as the independent Chair offirst woman to chair the Board of Directors of the Company as well as the ChairBoard of Directors of the BankBank. Our independent Board Chair serves as the principal representative of the Board of Directors, presiding over meetings of the Board of Directors and stockholders. Mr. Witter, our CEO, serves as a member of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors believes that, after June 18, 2020, an independent director is best situated to serve as Chair of our Board of Directors and of the Bank Board of Directors to serveChair as an effective counterbalance to management and our CEO, who also serves on the Board of Directors. By separating the CEO role from the Board Chair role, the Company is currently put in the best position to oversee all executives of the Company, monitor and respond to key risks and strategic initiatives at the Company, and act in the best interest of stockholders. The Board of Directors believes that the Company is currently best served by separating the roleroles of Board Chair and CEO, butwhile, subject to Sallie Mae’s By-Laws, the Board of Directors consistent with the Company’s governance guidelines and subject to the Company’sby-laws, reserves the right to revisit this structure and combine the two roles, depending on the future needs and strategy of the Company at aany given point in time. Our Chairman currently serves, and the independent Chair after June 18, 2020 will serve, as the principal representative of the Board of Directors, presiding over meetings of the Board of Directors and shareholders. In addition to our separate Chair and CEO structure, the Board of Directors’ governance guidelines provide for a Lead Independent Director to facilitate coordination of the activities of the Company’s independent directors. This position is currently held by Paul Child, an independent director who serves as our Lead Independent Director as well as a member on three of our committees of the Board of Directors: the Audit, Risk, and Strategic Planning Committees. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Child also attends all meetings held by our Board of Directors’ other committees. Our Lead Independent Director has historically provided strong independent leadership for the Board of Directors.

Director Independence

For a director to be considered independent, the Board of Directors must determine the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with Sallie Mae. The Board of Directors has adopted the Guidelines, which embody the corporate governance principles and practices of the Company. The Guidelines include the standards for determining director independence, which conform to the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) listing standards.

The Board of Directors has determined that alleach of the individuals who served as a director during 2019, other than Mr. Quinlan, our former CEO,2022 and all nominees standing for election at the Annual Meeting, other than Mr. Witter, our current CEO, are independent of Sallie Mae.

Each member of the Board of Directors’ Audit, Nominations and NGCGovernance, and Compensation Committees is independent within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing standards, Exchange Act Rule10A-3, and Sallie Mae’s own director independence standards set forth in the Guidelines. The Guidelines are published at www.salliemae.com/investors/corporate-governance/.

Board Diversity

Our Board of Directors believes diversity is important and seeks representation across a range of attributes, including gender, race, ethnicity, and professional experience, and regularly assesses diversity when identifying and evaluating director candidates. As of December 31, 2019,2022, our Board of Directors consisted of the following:

 

LOGO

*
LOGOLOGO

Including our Board Chair

 

2020 Proxy Statement16        SLM CORPORATION    13


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


CORPORATE GOVERNANCEPursuant to NASDAQ’s Board Diversity Rule, which was approved by the SEC on August 6, 2021, Board diversity disclosure is provided in the two tables below as ofDecember 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The Company is in compliance with the NASDAQ Board Diversity Rule as at least one director self-identifies as female and at least one additional director self-identifies as an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+.

Board Diversity Matrix (As of December 31, 2022)

LOGO

 

    

Total Number of Directors    12

             Female                         Male                     Non-Binary         

Did Not

   Disclose Gender   

Part I: Gender Identity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Directors

 4 8 

 

 

 

Part II: Demographic Background

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

African American or Black

 

 

 1 

 

 

 

    

Alaskan Native or Native American

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Asian

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Hispanic or Latinx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

White

 3 7 

 

 

 

    

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LGBTQ+

 1  
 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

 1  

Board Diversity Matrix (As of December 31, 2021)

LOGO

Total Number of Directors    12

             Female                         Male                     Non-Binary         Did Not
   Disclose Gender   

Part I: Gender Identity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Directors

 4 8 

 

 

 

Part II: Demographic Background

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

African American or Black

 

 

 1 

 

 

 

    

Alaskan Native or Native American

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Asian

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Hispanic or Latinx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

White

 3 7 

 

 

 

    

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LGBTQ+

 1  
 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

 1  

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Skills and Experience

 

LOGOLOGO

Board, Committee, and Annual Meeting Attendance

Our Board of Directors met nine15 times in 2019.2022. Each of the then-servingincumbent directors attended at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which he or she served. Directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting, and twelve11 out of thirteen12 of the then-serving members of the Board of Directors attended the Annual Meeting in June 2019. The only director not in attendance at2022. Mr. Frank C. Puleo retired on June 21, 2022, the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting in June 2019 was Jed Pitcher, whoMeeting. Accordingly, he did not seekstand for re-election to and did not attend the Board of Directors at the June 20192022 Annual Meeting.

Roles of the Board and Its Committees

The Board of Directors has established the following standing committees to assist in its oversight responsibilities: Audit; NGC;Compensation; Nominations and Governance; Financial Risk; Strategic Planning;Operational and Compliance Risk; and Preferred Stock. Separately, the Bank Board of Directors has also established a Compliance Committee. Each committee is governed by a Board-approved written charter, which is evaluated annually and which sets forth the respective committee’s functions, responsibilities, and delegated authority. Membership of each of the committees is established on an annual basis.

All of our committeeCommittee charters including the charter for our NGC Committee, are available atwww.salliemae.com under “For Investors, Corporate governance.”www.salliemae.com/investors/corporate-governance/. Stockholders may obtain a written copy of any and all committee charters by contacting the Corporate Secretary atcorporatesecretary@salliemae.com orSLM Corporation, 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713.

 

14    18        SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The following table sets forth the membership and number of meetings held for each committee of the Board of Directors as of December 31, 2019. Mr. Witter has not served on any committees since his appointment to the Board of Directors on April 20, 2020.2022.

 

         Audit(1)         Nominations,
Governance
and Compensation
        Risk(2)         Strategic
Planning
Preferred Stock
     

Paul G. Child(1) (2) (l) (L)

***
     

Mary Carter Warren Franke(2) (I)

***
     

Earl A. Goode+(1) (I)

*Co-Chair
     

Marianne M. Keler(1) (I)

Chair**
     

Mark L. Lavelle(2) (I)

***
     

Jim Matheson(I)

**
     

Frank C. Puleo+(2) (I)

Chair*
     

Raymond J. Quinlan+(C)

Co-Chair
     

Vivian Schneck-Last(2) (I)

***
     

William N. Shiebler+(1) (I)

Chair**
     

Robert S. Strong++(1) (2) (I)

*Chair
     

Kirsten O. Wolberg(I)

**

Number of Meetings in 2019

1012921

LOGO

  Audit(1) 

Nominations

and

Governance

 Compensation 

Operational

and Compliance
Risk(2)

 

Financial

Risk(2)

 Preferred Stock

R. Scott Blackley(1) (2)(+)

 * 

 

 

 

 * 

 

 

 

Paul G. Child(1) (2) (+)

 Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 * 

 

Mary Carter Warren Franke(2) (+) (C)

 

 

 * * 

 

 

 

 

 

Marianne M. Keler(1) (+)

 * Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 *

Mark L. Lavelle(2) (+)

 

 

 

 

 Chair 

 

 * 

 

Ted Manvitz(1) (+)

 * 

 

 * 

 

 

 

 *

Jim Matheson(+)

 * * 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frank C. Puleo(3) (+)

 

 

 *(3) 

 

 

 

 *(3) 

 

Samuel T. Ramsey(1) (2) (+)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 * * 

 

Vivian Schneck-Last (2) (+)

 

 

 * 

 

 Chair 

 

 

 

Robert S. Strong(1) (2) (+)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 * Chair 

 

Jonathan W. Witter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kirsten O. Wolberg(2) (+)

 

 

 

 

 * * 

 

 Chair

Number of Meetings in 2022

 9 6 8 6 11 1

 

*

Committee Member

 

+(C)

Also serves as a member of the Bank Compliance Committee.Board Chair

 

++

Also serves as Chair of the Bank Compliance Committee.

(C)

Chairman of the Board of Directors

(I)(+)

Independent Board Member

(L)

Lead Independent Director

 

(1)

The Board of Directors determined Mr. Child,Blackley, Mr. Goode,Child, Ms. Keler, Mr. Shiebler,Manvitz, Mr. Ramsey, and Mr. Strong each qualified as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as set forth in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K. During 2019,2022, none of the Audit Committee members served on the Audit Committee of more than three public companies.

 

(2)

The Board of Directors determined Mr. Blackely, Mr. Child, Ms. Franke, Mr. Lavelle, Mr. Puleo,Ramsey, Ms. Schneck-Last, and Mr. Strong, and Ms. Wolberg each qualified as a “Risk Management Expert” as such term is defined by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

 

(3)

Mr. Puleo served on the Nominations and Governance Committee and the Financial Risk Committee through his date of retirement from the Board of Directors on June 21, 2022.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    15

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        19


CORPORATE GOVERNANCECORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors and its committees oversee Sallie Mae’s overall strategic direction, including setting risk management philosophy, tolerance and parameters, and establishing procedures for assessing the risks of each business line as well as the risk management practices the management team develops and utilizes. Management escalates to the Board of Directors and/or its committees any significant departures from established tolerances and parameters and reviews new and emerging risks. Throughout the year, the Board of Directors and/or its committees dedicate a portion of their meetings to reviewing and discussing specific risk topics in greater detail with senior management, including risks related to cybersecurity. We believe this risk oversight structure complements our current Board leadership structure of separate Chair and CEO roles and each of the committees of the Board of Directors being comprised solely of independent directors. The primary risk oversight responsibilities of each of the standing committees of the Board of Directors are as follows:

 

Audit Committee

 

•  review of financial statements and periodic public reports;

 

  review reports prepared by management and/or external auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues;

•  review sufficiency of internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls;

 

•  engage and communicate with our independent registered public accounting firm; and

 

•  oversee operation of internal audit function, staffing, and work plan.

Nominations Governance and Compensation Committee

•  all compensation and benefits for our CEO, Executive Officers, and independent directors;

•  equity-based compensation plans;

•  management’s administration of employee benefit plans;

•  management succession planning;

•  confirm our incentive compensation practices properly balance risk and reward and do not encourage excessiverisk-taking;Governance

 

•  implement good governance policies and measures for Sallie Mae and our Board of Directors;

 

•  recommend nominees for election to the Board of Directors;

 

•  conduct assessments of the performance of the Board of Directors and its committees; and

 

•  review related party transactions.transactions; and

•  oversee the environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) function of the Company.

Compensation Committee

•  oversee all compensation and benefits for our CEO, executive officers, and independent directors;

•  oversee equity-based compensation plans;

•  review management’s administration of employee benefit plans;

•  review management succession planning;

•  oversee human capital management, including in the areas of diversity, equity, and inclusion; and

•  review and confirm our incentive compensation practices properly balance risk and reward and do not encourage excessive risk-taking.

Financial Risk Committee

 

•  monitor our major risk categories,financial risks, including credit, fundingmarket, and liquidity market, compliance, legal, operational, reputational and strategic, as well as our risk management capabilities, including those related to financial product safety, information and data security, privacy, crisis preparedness, business continuity, and disaster recovery plans (which responsibilities include oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity risk, profile assessments, and monitoring, as well as review of the Company’s strategy to mitigate cybersecurity risks);

•  review, approve, and authorize the terms and conditions of any loan securitization transaction, loan sale, or debt transaction of our Company or our affiliates;risks;

 

•  review our risk management framework as it pertains to financial risks and supporting governance structure, roles, and responsibilities established by management;

•  facilitate the distribution of risk-related information provided to the Risk Committee across and among the Board of Directors and its other committees, including cybersecurity and other information security issues, risks, and threats; and

 

•  review our risk appetite framework and conduct regular reviews of key risk measures.

Strategic Planning Committeemeasures with respect to financial risks;

 

•  engage the CEOreview and seniorapprove loan securitization transactions, loan sales, or debt transactions of our Company or our affiliates; and

•  oversee framework and strategies pertaining to liquidity and capital management in the strategic planning process and recommend proposals regarding the Company’s long-term strategic initiatives.review capital and liquidity stress testing scenarios and key assumptions.

Preferred StockOperational and Compliance Risk Committee

 

•  monitor our major non-financial risks, including operational and evaluate our business activities in light of the rights of holders of the Company’s preferred stock.compliance risks;

 

The Bank Committees•  review our risk management framework as it pertains to non-financial risks and supporting governance structure, roles, and responsibilities established by management;

All members

•  review our risk appetite framework and conduct regular reviews of the Board of Directors also serve as members of the board of directors of the Bankkey risk measures with respect to non-financial risks;

•  oversee and its committees. Our Audit, NGC, Risk,monitor information security and Strategic Planning committees perform similar oversight roles for the Bank. Separately, a Compliance Committee of the Bank Board of Directors has oversight over the establishment of standardscyber-related risks;

•  monitor risk management capabilities related to our monitoringthird-party service providers, information and control of legaldata security, privacy, crisis preparedness, business continuity and regulatory compliance risks and the qualification of employees overseeing these functions. The Compliance Committee overseesdisaster recovery plans;

•  oversee the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) program and monitorsmonitor its progress towards its CRA performance goals. Through the Bank’s CRA program, the Bank focuses on access to finance by fulfilling its CRA obligations through consumer and community development lending, qualified investments, including grants to community development organizations and education scholarships tolow- and moderate-income persons, and community development service activity, focusing on underserved communities in the Bank’s assessment area. During the 2019-2020 Board term, the Chairarea; and

•  oversee model risk management framework.

Preferred Stock Committee

•  monitor and evaluate our business activities in light of the Compliance Committee was Mr. Strong. Other membersrights of holders of the Compliance Committee were Mr. Goode, Mr. Puleo, Mr. Shiebler, and Mr. Quinlan.

Company’s preferred stock.

 

16    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCELOGO

 

    

All members of the Board of Directors also serve as members of the board of directors of the Bank and its committees. Our Audit, Compensation, Nominations and Governance, Financial Risk, and Operational and Compliance Risk committees perform similar oversight roles for the Bank.

20        SLM CORPORATION


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nominations Process

The NGCNominations and Governance Committee considers for nomination to the Board of Directors candidates recommended by stockholders and members of the Board of Directors. The candidates are evaluated based on the needs of the Board of Directors and Sallie Mae at that time. The Board of Directors seeks representation across a range of professional experiences, and that reflects gender, race, ethnic, and geographic diversity. The minimum qualifications and attributes the NGCNominations and Governance Committee believes a director nominee must possess include:

 

Knowledgeknowledge of the business of Sallie Mae;

 

Provenproven record of accomplishment;

 

Willingnesswillingness to commit the time necessary for Board of Directors service;

 

Integrityintegrity and sound judgment in areas relevant to the business;

 

Impartialityimpartiality in representing stockholders;

 

Abilityability to challenge and stimulate management; and

 

Independence.independence.

To recommend a candidate, stockholders should send, in writing, the candidate’s name, credentials, contact information, and his or her consent to be considered as a candidate to the Chair of the NGCNominations and Governance Committee atcorporatesecretary@salliemae.com orc/o Corporate Secretary, SLM Corporation, 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713. The stockholder should also include his or her contact information and a statement of his or her share ownership. The nomination deadline for the 20202023 Annual Meeting has now closed. A stockholder wishing to nominate a candidate for the 2024 Annual Meeting must comply with the notice and other requirements in the By-Laws as described under “Stockholder Proposals for the 20212024 Annual Meeting” in this proxy statement.

Related Party Transactions

Sallie Mae has a written policy regarding review and approval of related party transactions. Transactions covered by the policy are transactions involving Sallie Mae in excess of $120,000 in any year in which any director, nominee, executive officer, or greater-than-five percent beneficial owner of the Company, or any of their respective immediate family members, has or had a direct or indirect material interest, other than solely as a director and/orless-than-ten percent owner of an entity involved in the transaction (“Related Party Transactions”). Loans made in the ordinary course of Sallie Mae’s business to executive officers, directors, and their family members are considered Related Party Transactions and arepre-approved. Moreover, the Bank has also adopted written policies to implement the requirements of Regulation O of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, which restricts the extension of credit to directors and executive officers and their family members and other related interests. Under these policies, extensions of credit that exceed regulatory thresholds must be, and are, approved by the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors of the Bank. In 2019, the Company issued a credit card to Mr. Thome with a total of $10,000 of credit extended to him. Such credit card was issued in the ordinary course of business; is on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Company; and does not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other features unfavorable to the Company. Since January 1, 2019, we have not had any other transactions with related persons required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K, and no such transactions are currently proposed.

Under the Related Party Transactions policy, the General CounselChief Legal, Government Affairs and Communications Officer will notify the Chair of the NGCNominations and Governance Committee of any proposed Related Party Transaction, and the Chair of the NGCNominations and Governance Committee will determine if approval under the policy is required. If required, the NGCNominations and Governance Committee will then review the proposed Related Party Transaction and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors regarding whether to approve the transaction. In considering a transaction, the NGCNominations and Governance Committee takesand the Board of Directors take into account whether a transaction would be on terms no less favorable than to an unaffiliated third-partythird party under the same or similar circumstances, among other factors.

Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices

In conducting our business, we continually pursue practices that we believe will drive sustainable, long-term growth and profitability. Such “environmental, social, and governance” or “ESG” practices may mean different things to different investors and stakeholders and to the organizations that evaluate and rate ESG practices. For us,Our ESG practices mean we embrace the core principles of corporate responsibility and social purpose through everything we do for our customers, employees, communities, and environment. Our actions are shaped by our mission and purpose—helping families achievemission—to power confidence as students begin their unique journeys. In April 2023, we released our annual ESG report, discussing our commitment to ESG practices. For a full discussion, please read our ESG report at www.salliemae.com/esg. Neither the dream of a higher education. As an application of ESG practices, the Global Reporting Initiative Standards, the

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) are considered a roadmap for corporations to serve the long-term goals of society. These SDGs include SDG4-Quality Education (“SDG 4”), which aims to ensure inclusive and quality education for all. We support the general goals of SDG 4 and agree that education is one of the most powerful and proven vehicles for sustainable development. We support the goal of universal access to quality higher education, whether it be for a degree program, continuing education, or certificate training.

At its core, education creates opportunities for individuals to realize their dreams, succeed, and lead more fulfilling and purposeful lives. Those who attend and graduate from college move forward with a wide range of personal, financial, and other lifelong benefits, including an ability to positively affect the outcomes of our most significant societal challenges.

ESG at a Glance

We describe some of our key ESG practices in this section, but more details regarding ESG can be found in our inaugural Corporate Social Responsibility Report (“CSR Report”) that was published in March 2020 and available onreport nor our website athttp://www.salliemae.com/csr. The CSR Report is not incorporated by reference herein, and is not a part ofin this proxy statement or the 2019 Form10-K.

Our Customers

As the premier financial brand for college and continuous education, we are in the business of building prosperous futures by providing access, planning outcomes, and helping students and families responsibly fund their future. Along with a company-wide commitment to honesty, dependability, and integrity, we are committed to:statement.

 

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        21


Offering our customers a diversified set of fairly priced products;CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

IncreasingHuman Capital Empowerment and Talent Development

We believe in a just and inclusive, values-based, mission-led culture that inspires commitment and drives performance. Our human capital strategy is focused on the attraction, development, empowerment, recognition, and rewarding of team members as they bring our customers’ long-term financial stability;mission to life.

Treating our customersWe strive to create a diverse culture of inclusion and partners with respect;

Rewarding successful customer credit management(on-time payment incentive);

Contributing time and resources to improving our community; and

Creating a workan environment that encourages and reinforces mutual trust, makes it safe to express thoughts, ideas and concerns, and connects and embraces diverse backgrounds and perspectives to power and fuel our mission. We believe such a diverse and inclusive workforce can lead to a more effective company.

We are focused on providing a total compensation package that enables us to attract, motivate, and retain our employees to reachhelp drive our business forward. Our benefits package includes company contributions to the 401(k) plan, educational assistance to our team members and their potential.dependents, flexible work arrangements, and other comprehensive health and welfare programs. We also believe in paying competitive market wages, which is why we established $20/hour as our minimum starting rate for all positions in 2021.

As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately 1,700 team members, all located in the United States. We believe an engaged workforce leads to a more innovative, productive, and profitable company. For this reason, we measure employee engagement through culture surveys. These commitments formculture surveys provide insights we use to create an environment in which team members thrive and bring their full selves to work.

Ensuring the foundationsafety and well-being of our mutual success.team members continued to be a priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition,March 2020, we are committedenacted a robust business continuity plan, including remote working capabilities for all team members. We further adapted to helpingthe changing environment in 2021, and now offer remote, in-office, and hybrid options so our next generation make informed decisions aboutteam may work in a manner best suited for them and their education. After all, education in all forms is the foundation for success, an equalizer of opportunities, and a proven pathway to economic mobility.

Human Capital Management and Talent Development

positions. We value our highly-skilled employees at all levels who help us drive sustainable, long-term growth, and profitability. We express our appreciation through:

Policies and programs to identify, develop, retain, and promote talent from within our workforce;

Our management incentive plan and long-term incentive plan providing for cash and equity bonuses to employees to help incentivize employee productivity, which contributes to our success;

Our policies intendedcontinue to provide equal opportunity for all employeesteam members with the tools and job applicants without regardresources necessary to race, ethnicity, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, disability, national origin, marital status, citizenship status, protected veteran status, genetic information, gender identity, or any other basis prohibited by applicable law;support their success and drive performance of the Company.

Opportunities given to employees soOur team members are involved in the communities in which they may serve their communitieslive and work through the Sallie Mae Employee Volunteer Program and the Sallie Mae Employee Matching Gift Program.

Community In 2022, our team members volunteered 1,928 hours of their time through our community engagement programs. We also provide matching gifts for team members to support the interests and needs of them and their communities.

At Corporate Governance

Sallie Mae, we are passionate about getting involvedMae’s Board of Directors, executive leaders, team members, and giving back in the communities where we live and work. We strive to help create brighter futures by working directly withnot-for-profit organizations such as Big Brothers Big Sisters, Special Olympics, and Folds of Honor. Sallie Mae employees regularly volunteer in their communities, collecting and donating gifts to local families, educating grade school students on financial literacy and consumer finance, and packing meals for families in need.

18    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Environmental Stewardship and Attention to Climate Change

We continue to make improvements at our facilities as webusiness partners are committed to improvingoperating under sound principles of corporate governance. We believe maintaining high standards of accountability and transparency are fundamental for the environmental sustainabilitylong-term success of our business by using resourcesbusiness. Our corporate governance structure ensures robust Board and materials thoughtfully, allmanagement responsibility, responsiveness to our stockholders, and responsible decision-making. Our overarching code of which have a positive environmental impact onconduct, corporate governance policies, Board committee charters, certificate of incorporation, and By-Laws form the communities in which we operate. More broadly, our country’s environmental challenges are better and more meaningfully understood and addressed by an educated population.framework of governance at Sallie Mae is proudMae. Since the formation of the roleCompany, we playhave attracted and built a strong, qualified, and diverse Board of Directors whose members have expertise relevant to our business and are deeply committed to operating ethically and with integrity. Eleven members of the Board are independent directors, including Ms. Franke, the first woman to serve as Board Chair in building a more educated and sustainable tomorrow.the Company’s history.

Political Expenditures

Our current policy on political activities is publicly available on our website atwww.salliemae.com under “For Investors” www.salliemae.com/investors/corporate-governance/ and sets forth the principles regarding our stance on political activities. We comply with federal, state, and local lobbying registration and disclosure requirements, and we do not engage in grassroots lobbying.requirements. We work closely with the NGCNominations and Governance Committee to review and reconsiderassess our existing policies, procedures, and decision-making approaches to government relations and political activities.

At this time, we have one long-term, experienced employee engaged in lobbying activities exclusively related to matters that directly or indirectly affect the Private Education Loan (as hereinafter defined) industry and our mission. The compensation of the employee, and other executives, for time attributed to lobbying activity is reported as lobbying expenditure. That employee manages one external, bipartisan lobbying/consulting firmfirms that assistsassist with the same objectives, and we report the lobbying-related expenditures made to this firmexternal firms in our lobbying disclosures. Our involvement with industry associations is limited to those associations comprised of financial institutions with similar interests.

22        SLM CORPORATION


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Quarterly disclosures detailing our lobbying activities and expenditures, as required by the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, are posted online by the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives and the Secretary of the U.S. Senate. Disclosures relating to contributions by our Political Action Committee are posted online by the Federal Election Commission (“FEC”). We will continue to comply with all applicable laws and regulations on disclosure of those activities.

At this time, we do not believe the preparation and dissemination of any additional reports on these matters would provide any meaningful information to our stockholders. We will continue to consider the value to stockholders of additional reporting of our political activities as our activities evolve, and review this matter periodically with the NGC Committee.

The Sallie Mae Political Action Committee (“PAC”)

In June 2015, we formed the Sallie Mae PAC. All of the assets and activities of its predecessor prior to theSpin-Off (the“Spin-Off”) of Navient Corporation (“Navient”) in April 2014 were assumed and taken over by Navient in connection with theSpin-Off.

Our PAC is governed by an Advisory Board comprised of six employees, who represent different divisions within the Sallie Mae organization. The PAC’s Advisory Board reviews and approves all PAC and corporate political contributions. The PAC’s Advisory Board evaluates candidates, of any party, on the basis offactors that include their views on issuespolicy matters that impact usSallie Mae and our employees, their committee or ourleadership role, and representation of Sallie Mae facilities and employees. It also takes note of whether our facilities or employees reside in a candidate’s district or state.

Our PAC contributions are published on the FEC website.

Stockholder Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may submit communications to the Board of Directors, thenon-management directors as a group, the Lead Independent Director,Board Chair, or any other individual member of the Board of Directors by contacting the Lead Independent DirectorCorporate Secretary in writing atcorporatesecretary@salliemae.com orc/o Corporate Secretary, SLM Corporation, 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713.

Code of Business Conduct

We have a Code of Business Conduct that applies to the Board of Directors members and all employees. The Code of Business Conduct is available on our website (www.salliemae.com under “For Investors”www.salliemae.com/investors/corporate-governance/) and a written copy is available from the Corporate Secretary. We intend to post amendments to or waivers of the Code of Business Conduct, if any (to the extent applicable to the Company’s chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or any director), at this location on our website.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    192023 PROXY STATEMENT        23


REPORTOFTHE AUDIT COMMITTEEOFTHE BOARDOF DIRECTORS

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSReport of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

 

1.

Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee, in its oversight role, has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the Company’s management.

 

2.

The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).

 

3.

The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB, regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG its independence.

 

4.

The Audit Committee has an established charter outlining the practices it follows. The charter is available on the Company’s website atwww.salliemae.com under “For Investors.”

 

5.

The Audit Committee’s charter requires thepre-approval by the Audit Committee of all fees paid to, and all services performed by, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. At the beginning of each year, the Audit Committee approves the proposed services, including the nature, type and scope of service contemplated and the related fees, to be rendered by the firm during the year. In addition, engagements may arise during the course of the year that are outside the scope of the initial services and fees approved by the Audit Committee. Any such additional engagements are approved by the Audit Committee or by the Audit Committee Chair pursuant to authority delegated by the Audit Committee. For each category of proposed service, the independent registered public accounting firm is required to confirm that the provision of such services does not impair its independence. Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the fees and services provided as noted in the table on the following page were authorized and approved by the Audit Committee in compliance with thepre-approval requirements described herein.

 

6.

Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs (1) through (5) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the Company, and the Board of Directors has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022 for filing with the Commission.

Audit Committee

Marianne M. Keler, Chair

Audit Committee

Paul G. Child, Chair

R. Scott Blackley

Marianne M. Keler

Ted Manvitz

Paul G. Child

Mary Carter Warren Franke

Mark L. Lavelle

Jim Matheson

Vivian C. Schneck-Last

20    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC

ACCOUNTING FIRM

24        SLM CORPORATION


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees for 2022 and 2021

Aggregate fees billed for services performed for Sallie Mae by its independent accountant, KPMG, for fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, are set forth below.

LOGO

   2022   2021 

Audit Fees

   $2,149,441    $1,877,570 

Audit Related Fees

   $945,000    $1,110,000 

Tax Fees

       $3,679 

All other fees

        

Total

   $3,094,441    $2,991,249 

Audit Fees. Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of Sallie Mae and statutory and subsidiary audits, and for 2019 and 2018

Aggregate fees billed for services performed for Sallie Mae by its independent accountant, KPMG, for fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, are set forth below.

   2019   2018 
  

Audit Fees

  $2,110,910   $1,954,495 
  

Audit-Related Fees

  $546,000   $711,000 
  

Tax Fees

      $42,375 
  

All Other Fees

        
  

Total

  $2,656,910   $2,707,870 

Audit Fees. Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of the consolidated financial statements of Sallie Mae and statutory and subsidiary audits, issuance of comfort letters, consents, income tax provision procedures, and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees include fees for assurance services related to servicing compliance reports, trust servicing and administration compliance reports, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, and services related to the issuance of consents and comfort letters.

Tax Fees. Tax fees include fees for federal and state tax compliance, and tax consultation services.

All Other Fees. All other fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 were $0. All other fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 were $0.

Pre-Approval Requirements

The Audit Committee’s charter addresses the approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company. The Audit Committee’s charter requires all services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm be pre-approved by the Audit Committee or its Chair. Each approval of the Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee must describe the services provided and set a dollar limit for the services. The Audit Committee, or its Chair, pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG during 2022. Reporting is provided to the Audit Committee regarding services the Chair of the Audit Committee pre-approved between committee meetings. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management regarding the actual provision of all services by KPMG. No services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the “de minimis” exception to the pre-approval requirement set forth in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        25


Ownership of Common Stock by 5 percent or more holders

The following table provides information about each stockholder known to Sallie Mae to beneficially own five percent or more of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock, based solely on the information filed by each such stockholder in 2023 for the year ended December 31, 2022 on Schedule 13G, 13G/A, or 13F-HR, as applicable, under the Exchange Act.

LOGO

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Shares(1)   Percent(1) 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

   31,617,580    12.64

Impactive Capital LP(3)

152 West 57th Street, 17th Floor

New York, New York 10019

   23,544,180    9.78

BlackRock, Inc.(4)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

   22,052,246    8.8

Massachusetts Financial Services Company(5)

111 Huntington Avenue

Boston, MA 02199

   17,456,866    7.0

UBS Group AG(6)

Bahnhofstrasse 45

PO Box CH-8021

Zurich, Switzerland

   16,562,446    6.62

(1)

Based on information in the most recent Schedule 13G, 13G/A, or 13F-HR, as the case may be, filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees include fees for assurance and other services related to service provider compliance reports, trust servicing and administration reports, internal control reviews, and attest services that are not required by statute or regulation.

Tax Fees. Tax fees include fees for federal and state tax compliance, and tax consultation services.

All Other Fees. All other fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 were $0. All other fees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 were $0.

Pre-Approval Requirements

The Audit Committee’s charter addresses the approval of audit andnon-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to the Company. The Audit Committee’s charter requires all services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm bepre-approved by the Audit Committee or its Chair. Each approval of the Audit Committee or the Chair of the Audit Committee must describe the services provided and set a dollar limit for the services. The Audit Committee, or its Chair,pre-approved all audit andnon-audit services provided by KPMG during 2019. Reporting is provided to the Audit Committee regarding services the Chair of the Audit Committeepre-approved between committee meetings. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from management regarding the actual provision of all services by KPMG. No services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm were approved by the Audit CommitteeSEC pursuant to the de minimis” exceptionExchange Act with respect to thepre-approval requirement set forth in paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule2-01 of RegulationS-X.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    21


OWNERSHIPOF COMMON STOCKBY 5 PERCENTOR MORE HOLDERS

OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY 5 PERCENT OR MORE HOLDERS

The following table provides information about each stockholder known to Sallie Mae to beneficially own five percent or moreholdings of the outstandingCompany’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2022. Percentages are based on computations contained in the Schedule 13G or 13G/A of the reporting entity and other information we reasonably believe to be accurate.

(2)

Information is as of December 31, 2022 and is based upon a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023, by The Vanguard Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the voting for 0 shares of our Common Stock, based solely on the information filed by each such stockholder in 2020shared power to vote or direct the voting for 121,322 shares of Common Stock, the year endedsole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 31,252,070 shares of Common Stock, and shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 365,510 shares of Common Stock.

(3)

Information is as of December 31, 20192022 and is based upon a Schedule 13F-HR, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023, by Impactive Capital LP, a Delaware limited partnership. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the vote for 23,544,180 shares of Common Stock.

(4)

Information is as of December 31, 2022 and is based upon a Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on January 25, 2023, by BlackRock, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the voting for 21,362,029 shares of Common Stock and the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 22,052,246 shares of Common Stock.

(5)

Information is as of December 31, 2022 and is based upon a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 8, 2023, by Massachusetts Financial Services Company, a Delaware corporation. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or on Schedule13F-HR, as applicable, underdirect the Exchange Act.    voting for 17,146,433 shares of Common Stock and the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 17,456,866 shares of Common Stock.

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Shares(1)    Percent(1)      
  

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

39,923,8559.5%
  

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(3)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

39,270,8639.3%
  

ValueAct Holdings, L.P.(4)

1 Letterman Drive, Building D, 4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94129

39,184,2549.3%
  

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(5)

100 E. Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

23,639,2455.5%
  

CI Investments Inc.(6)

2 Queen Street East, 20th Floor

Toronto, Canada A6 M5C 3G7

21,914,2335.2%
(6)

(1)

Based on information in the most recent Schedule 13G/A or Schedule13F-HR, as the case may be, filed with the SEC pursuant to the Exchange Act with respect to holdings of the Company’s Common Stock as of December 31, 2019. Percentages are based on computations contained in the Schedule 13G/A of the reporting entity and other information we reasonably believe to be accurate.

(2)

Information is as of December 31, 2019 and is based upon a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 6, 2020, by BlackRock, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the voting for 38,005,918 shares of Common Stock and the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 39,923,855Information is as of December 30, 2022 and is based upon a Schedule 13G, filed with the SEC on February 13, 2023, by UBS Group AG for the benefit and on behalf of the UBS Asset Management (Americas) Inc. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the voting for 12,838,414 shares of Common Stock, the shared power to vote or direct the voting for 0 shares of Common Stock, the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 0 shares of Common Stock, and shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 16,562,446 shares of Common Stock.

 

(3)

Information is as of December 31, 2019 and is based upon a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, by The Vanguard Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the voting for 222,378 shares of Common Stock, the shared power to vote or direct the voting for 82,251 shares of Common Stock, the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 39,027,690 shares of Common Stock, and shared power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 243,173 shares of Common Stock.

26        SLM CORPORATION

(4)

Information is as of December 31, 2019 and is based upon a Schedule13F-HR, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020, by ValueAct Holdings, L.P. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or to direct the vote for 39,184,254 shares of Common Stock.

(5)

Information is as of December 31, 2019 and is based upon a Schedule 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2020, by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., a Maryland corporation. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or direct the voting for 7,864,939 shares of Common Stock and sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition of 23,639,245 shares of Common Stock.

(6)

Information is as of December 31, 2019 and is based upon a Schedule13F-HR, filed with the SEC on February 11, 2020, by CI Investments Inc. The reporting entity reported the sole power to vote or to direct the vote for 21,914,233 shares of Common Stock.

22    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


OWNERSHIPOF COMMON STOCKBY DIRECTORSAND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Ownership of Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information concerning the beneficial ownership of Sallie Mae’s Common Stock by: (i) our current directors and nominees; (ii) the Named Executive Officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iii) all of the Company’s current directors and executive officers as a group. Under SEC rules, beneficial ownership for purposes of this table takes into account shares as to which the individual has or shares voting and/or investment power as well as shares that may be acquired within 60 days (such as by exercising vested stock options). Information is provided as of February 28, 2023, unless noted otherwise. As of February 28, 2023, the Company had 242,216,315 outstanding shares of Common Stock. The beneficial owners listed have sole voting and investment power with respect to shares beneficially owned, except as to the interests of spouses or as otherwise indicated.

LOGO

   Shares   Vested
Options(1)
   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percent
of
Class
 

Directors and Director Nominees

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

R. Scott Blackley

               * 

Paul G. Child

   79,008        79,008    * 

Mary Carter Warren Franke(2)

   84,151        84,151    * 

Marianne M. Keler(3)

   113,758        113,758    * 

Mark L. Lavelle

   44,414        44,414    * 

Ted Manvitz

   20,121        20,121    * 

Jim Matheson

   78,318        78,318    * 

Samuel T. Ramsey

   8,081        8,081    * 

Vivian C. Schneck-Last

   71,098        71,098    * 

Robert S. Strong

   99,623        99,623    * 

Jonathan W. Witter(4)

   909,332        909,332    * 

Kirsten O. Wolberg

   54,200        54,200    * 

Named Executive Officers

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

Steven J. McGarry(5)

   316,956        316,956    * 

Kerri A. Palmer

   9,096        9,096    * 

Daniel P. Kennedy

   205,322        205,322    * 

Donna F. Vieira

   84,490        84,490    * 

Current Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 Persons)

   2,202,433        2,202,433    * 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1 percent.

(1)

Shares that may be acquired within 60 days (such as by exercising vested stock options). Information is provided as of February 28, 2020, unless noted otherwise. As2023, through exercise of February 28, 2020, the Company had 419,962,492 outstandingvested net settled options. Net settled options are shown on a “spread basis” and if not in-the-money shown as 0.

(2)

Includes 7,000 shares of Common Stock. The beneficial owners listed have sole voting and investment power with respect toheld by Ms. Franke’s spouse in his IRA.

(3)

Includes 76,574 shares beneficially owned, except as to the interests of spouses or as otherwise indicated.held in trust.

 

   Shares   Vested
Options
(1)
   

 

Total
Beneficial
Ownership

   Percent
of
Class
 
    
  Directors and Director Nominees            
    
  Paul G. Child   52,693        52,693    * 
    
  Mary Carter Warren Franke   50,836        50,836    * 
   
  Earl A. Goode   128,365    4,804    133,169    * 
    
  Marianne M. Keler(2)   87,443        87,443    * 
   
  Mark L. Lavelle   10,869        10,869    * 
    
  Jim Matheson   45,092        45,092    * 
   
  Frank C. Puleo   139,487    4,804    144,291    * 
    
  Raymond J. Quinlan   1,011,283        1,011,283    * 
   
  Vivian C. Schneck-Last   44,783        44,783    * 
    
  William N. Shiebler(3)   65,364        65,364    * 
   
  Robert S. Strong   67,836        67,836    * 
    
  Jonathan W. Witter(4)                
   
  Kirsten O. Wolberg   26,081        26,081    * 
    
  Named Executive Officers            
   
  Steven J. McGarry(5)   220,077    15,168    235,245    * 
    
  Paul F. Thome   135,492    15,168    150,660    * 
   
  Donna F. Vieira   9,373        9,373    * 
    
  Nicolas Jafarieh(6)   34,778        34,778    * 
   

  Current Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (19 Persons)

  

 

2,189,816

 

  

 

40,855

 

  

 

2,230,671

 

  

 

*

 

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1 percent.
(4)

Includes 249,015 shares that vested on April 20, 2023.

(5)

(1)

Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of February 28, 2020, through exercise of vested net settled options. Net settled options are shown on a “spread basis” and if notin-the-money shown as 0.

(2)

Includes 76,574 shares held in trust.

(3)

Includes 1,027 shares held in trust and 10,000 shares held in a partnership.

(4)

Effective April 20, 2020, Mr. Witter was appointed CEO as well as a director on the Board of Directors. As of February 28, 2020, Mr. Witter did not own any shares of Company Common Stock.

(5)

Includes 111Includes 117 shares credited as phantom stock units due to a deferred compensation plan account.

 

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        27


Executive Officers

Our executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors. The following sets forth biographical information concerning Sallie Mae’s executive officers who are not directors. Biographical information for Mr. Witter is included in Proposal 1—Election of Directors.

(6)

Includes 2,083 shares that vested on March 1, 2020.

LOGO

Steven J. McGarry

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    23Age 65


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Position and Business Experience

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, SLM Corporation—May 2014 to present; Senior Vice President—Corporate Finance and Investor Relations, SLM Corporation—June 2013 to April 2014; Senior Vice President—Investor Relations, SLM Corporation—June 2008 to June 2013

 

 

LOGO

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our executive officers are appointed annually by the Board of Directors. The following sets forth biographical information concerning Sallie Mae’s executive officers who are not directors. Biographical information for Mr. Witter is included in Proposal 1—Election of Directors.Kerri A. Palmer

 

Age 52

Position and Business Experience

Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer, SLM Corporation and President, Sallie Mae Bank—January 2023-Present; Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, SLM Corporation—April 2022 to January 2023; Executive Vice President and Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, SLM Corporation—January 2021 to April 2022

Senior Vice President, Risk Management, Capital One Financial Corporation—2013 to January 2021; Managing Vice President and Business Chief Risk Officer, Auto Finance and Mortgage, Capital One Financial Corporation—2008 to 2013

 

Name and Age

Position and Business Experience

Steven J. McGarry

62

•  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, SLM Corporation—May 2014 to present; Senior Vice President—Corporate Finance and Investor Relations, SLM Corporation—June 2013 to April 2014; Senior Vice President—Investor Relations, SLM Corporation—June 2008 to June 2013

Paul F. Thome

69

•  Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, SLM Corporation and President of Sallie Mae Bank—February 2016 to present; Senior Vice President, SLM Corporation and President of Sallie Mae Bank—January 2011 to February 2016; Senior Vice President—Business Finance, SLM Corporation—March 2009 to January 2011

•  Chief Financial Officer andCo-Founder, Credit One Financial ServicesLLC-October 2006 to March 2009

•  Executive Vice President, MBNA Corporation—1996 to 2006

Donna F. Vieira

55

•  Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, SLM Corporation—January 2019 to present

•  Chief Marketing Officer, Consumer Banking and Wealth Management, JPMorgan Chase—May 2014 to October 2018

•  Chief Marketing Officer, Chase Business Banking, JPMorgan Chase—April 2011 to May 2014

•  Senior Vice President, Relationship Manager, Dun & Bradstreet—March 2010 to April 2011

•  Senior Vice President, General Manager Small Business Products, Dun & Bradstreet—July 2008 to March 2010

Jonathan R. Boyles

53

•  Senior Vice President, Controller, SLM Corporation—May 2014 to present; Vice President, Corporate Financial Reporting and Accounting Policy, SLM Corporation—May 2010 to April 2014

Jeffrey F. Dale

58

•  Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer, SLM Corporation—July 2014 to present

•  North American Group Risk Director, Citigroup—February 2009 to July 2014

•  Divisional Risk Officer, Lloyds TSB—July 2006 to February 2009

Nicolas Jafarieh

45

•  Senior Vice President and General Counsel, SLM Corporation—March 2018 to present

•  Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, and Assistant Corporate Secretary, SLM Corporation—February 2017 to March 2018

•  Vice President, Associate General Counsel, and Assistant Corporate Secretary, SLM Corporation—December 2013 to February 2017

•  Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Sallie Mae, Inc.—February 2010 to December 2013

•  Associate General Counsel, Sallie Mae, Inc.—June 2008 to February 2010

24    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

 

 

LOGO

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISDonna F. Vieira

 

CD&A RoadmapAge 58

Position and Business Experience

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer, SLM Corporation—August 2020 to present; Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, SLM Corporation—January 2019 to August 2020

Director, Choice Hotels International, Inc. —July 2021-Present

Chief Marketing Officer, Consumer Banking and Wealth Management, JPMorgan Chase—May 2014 to October 2018; Chief Marketing Officer, Chase Business Banking, JPMorgan Chase—April 2011 to May 2014

Senior Vice President, Relationship Manager, Dun & Bradstreet—March 2010 to April 2011

Senior Vice President, General Manager Small Business Products, Dun & Bradstreet—July 2008 to March 2010

28        SLM CORPORATION


LOGO

Executive SummaryJonathan R. Boyles

In this

Age 56

Position and Business Experience

Senior Vice President, Controller, SLM Corporation—May 2014 to present; Vice President, Corporate Financial Reporting and Accounting Policy, SLM Corporation—May 2010 to April 2014

LOGO

Nicolas Jafarieh

Age 48

Position and Business Experience

Executive Vice President and Chief Legal, Government Affairs & Communications Officer, SLM Corporation—April 2022 to present; Senior Vice President and Chief Legal, Government Affairs & Communications Officer, SLM Corporation-August 2020 to April 2022; Senior Vice President and General Counsel, SLM Corporation—March 2018 to August 2020; Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, and Assistant Corporate Secretary, SLM Corporation—February 2017 to March 2018; Vice President, Associate General Counsel, and Assistant Corporate Secretary, SLM Corporation—December 2013 to February 2017; Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, Sallie Mae, Inc.—February 2010 to December 2013; Associate General Counsel, Sallie Mae, Inc.—June 2008 to February 2010

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        29


Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

LOGO

CD&A Roadmap

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“

30

CD&A”), we describe our compensation practices&A Roadmap

30

Executive Summary

31

Compensation Philosophy

32

Named Executive Officers

32

Compensation Practices Summary

33

Stockholder Engagement & Say-on-Pay Results

34

Stock Performance

35

Highlights of Company Performance

35

Allocation of Compensation

36

Elements of Compensation

37

How Our Compensation Decisions Are Made

38

2022 Annual Incentive Plan for Named Executive Officers

40

2022 AIP Funding and programs in the context of our NEOs. It is worth noting our compensation practices and programs applicable to our NEOs in many cases also apply to senior executive employees other than our NEOs. In addition, as previously disclosed, on April 19, 2020, following his tenure as Chairman and CEO for the Company, Mr. Quinlan no longer serves as CEO and Mr. Witter was appointed CEO, effective as of April 20, 2020.Payout Computation

41

We continue to refine our executive compensation practices and programs through feedback from stockholders, alignment with our performance, and continuing assessments of competitive practices. We use these practices and programs to attract, motivate and retain our NEOs and other executives. In particular, we will explain how the NGC Committee2022 NEO Long-Term Incentive Program

43

NEO Achievements

44

Vesting of the Board2020 PSU Grants

45

Risk Assessments and Attestations of Directors made 2019 compensation decisions for our NEOs.Compensation Plans

47

Our primary business isCompensation Consultant

47

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

48

Peer Group Analysis

48

Other Arrangements, Policies, and Practices Related to originate and service high-quality Private Education Loans. “Private Education Loans” are education loans for students or their families that are not made, insured or guaranteed by any state or federal government. We also offer a range of deposit products insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and operate a consumer savings network that provides financial rewards on everyday purchases to help families save for college. In 2019, nearly 456,000 families chose us as their Private Education Loan provider, more than any other private student loan lender. We originated $5.6 billion of Private Education Loans, an increase of 6 percent from the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, we had $22.9 billion of Private Education Loans, net, outstanding.Executive Compensation Programs

48

Our performance-based compensation programs, including our 2019 Management Incentive Plan (“2019 MIP”) and grant of PSUs, focus our senior executives on goals which drive our financial performance. As discussed in more detail herein, our 2019 MIP encourages executives to focus on customer growth (through metrics such as private education loan originations, customer ease, andpre-tax,pre-provision income), while both our 2019 MIP and PSU grants ensure that such growth comes from high credit quality loans (through metrics such as weighted average origination FICO score for Private Education Loans, gross Private Education Loan defaults as a percentage of average loan balances in repayment, and cumulative charge-offs). In addition to the more traditional financial metrics (core earnings per share and operating efficiency ratio), these goals focused our senior executives’ attention on increasing the number of Private Education Loans we originated in 2019.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    25


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

The compensation set forth in this CD&A, and the amounts provided by our NGCCompensation Committee and the Board of Directors in connection with the 2019 MIP and PSU grants, were determined before theCOVID-19 crisis was taken into account. The unfoldingCOVID-19 crisis, including its impact on the economy and our business, will be taken into account in reviewing and setting compensation for our NEOs on ago-forward basis.Report

Compensation Philosophy

Thepay-for-performance philosophy underlying our executive compensation program provides a competitive total compensation program tied to both Company and individual performance and aligned with the interests of our stockholders. We use the following principles to implement our compensation philosophy and achieve our executive compensation program objectives:

Tie a significant portion of the total compensation of our executives to the achievement of enterprise-wide goals that drive shareholder value pursuant to the 2019 MIP, as described in further detail on page 34.

Focus executive compensation towards long-term equity-based incentives to reward long-term growth and focus management on sustained success and shareholder value creation.

Grant PSUs tied to (i) cumulative charge-offs,(ii) pre-tax,pre-provision income, and (iii) total shareholder return (“TSR”) as a modifier to further align executive compensation with the long-term, sustainable performance of the Company.

Establish stock ownership guidelines that link the interests of our executives with our common stockholders.

Provide base salaries that are competitive and permit us to attract, motivate, and retain those executives who drive our success.

Provide competitive employee benefits and limited perquisites.

Named Executive Officers

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019,

51

30        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), we describe our compensation practices and programs in the context of our NEOs. It is worth noting our compensation practices and programs applicable to our NEOs in many cases also apply to senior executive employees other than our NEOs.

Our primary business is to originate and service high-quality Private Education Loans. “Private Education Loans” are education loans for students or their families that are not made, insured, or guaranteed by any state or federal government. We also offer a range of deposit products insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In 2022, approximately 369,000 families chose us as their Private Education Loan provider, more than any other private student loan lender. We originated approximately $6.0 billion of Private Education Loans in 2022, an increase of 10 percent from the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2022, we had $19.0 billion of Private Education Loans held for investment, net, outstanding. The Private Education Loans we make to students and families serve primarily to bridge the gap between the cost of higher education and the amount funded through family income and savings, scholarships and grants, and federal financial aid. We also extend Private Education Loans as an alternative to similar federal education loan products where we believe our rates are competitive.

Our performance-based compensation programs, including the 2022 Annual Incentive Plan, which consists of (i) a short-term annual cash bonus (the “2022 AIP”), and (ii) the performance-based element of the LTIP, consisting of a grant of PSUs that vest solely based on a relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) measure that vests over a three-year period, focus our senior executives on goals that drive our financial performance while balancing risk and reward.

As discussed in more detail herein, our 2022 AIP encourages executives to focus on customer growth (through the Private Education Loan originations metric), while ensuring that such growth comes from high credit quality loans (through the private Education Loan originations metrics). Our 2022 performance-based compensation programs also include the following financial metrics: pre-tax, pre-provision, pre-operating expense income per share, operating expenses, and relative TSR.

Although the Company’s TSR performance has been positive over the last three years, payouts under our 2022 AIP were lower for 2022 than for 2021 because the Company’s performance in 2022 based on other performance metrics was not as strong as in 2021. While we achieved significant Company successes in 2022, such as (i) growing originations, (ii) expanding net interest margin, (iii) returning a significant amount of capital to stockholders, and (iv) rigorously managing expenses in an uncertain macroeconomic environment, we did not deliver on certain key Company performance metrics. Specifically, (a) charge-offs were higher than anticipated due to a combination of factors, including the previously announced credit administration practices changes the Company implemented in 2021 that imposed additional requirements for those borrowers requesting forbearance, as well as a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges during much of 2022; and (b) earnings per share were lower than expected based on the fourth-quarter provision for credit losses of $297 million and the write down of $60 million of the value of an investment in non-marketable equity securities. Accordingly, because we continue to value a pay-for-performance philosophy that aligns compensation with Company performance, NEO payouts under the 2022 AIP were approximately 15% less than the prior year’s NEO annual incentive plan payouts, as illustrated in the “Non-Equity Incentive Compensation” column in the Summary Compensation Table on page 52. This was the case despite other accomplishments that have brought significant value to our stockholders.

We believe this continued emphasis on performance-based compensation, as well as the continued focus on share value as a key metric for equity-based compensation, should further align our executives’ compensation with the interests of our stockholders.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        31


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Philosophy

The pay-for-performance philosophy underlying our executive compensation program provides a competitive total compensation program tied to both Company and individual performance, aligned with the interests of our stockholders, and designed to attract and retain executives. For 2022, we used the following principles to implement our compensation philosophy and achieve our executive compensation program objectives:

Tie a significant portion of the total compensation of our executives to the achievement of enterprise-wide goals that drive stockholder value.

Focus executive compensation to reward short-term performance and long-term growth and focus management on sustained success and stockholder value creation while balancing risk and financial results.

Determine executive compensation amounts without considering amounts realized (or not) from prior annual or long-term incentive compensation programs.

Named Executive Officers

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, our Named Executive Officers were:

 

Raymond J. Quinlan(1)

Chairman of the Board

of Directors and Former Chief

Executive Officer

Steven J. McGarry

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Paul F. Thome

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer

Donna F. Vieira

Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer

Nicolas Jafarieh

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

 

(1)

As part of our succession planning process, Mr. Quinlan no longer serves as CEO, effective as of April 19, 2020, and will no longer serve as a director or Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective as of June 18, 2020.

LOGO

(1)

Ms. Palmer was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer and President of Sallie Mae Bank effective January 9, 2023.

 

(2)

26    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy StatementIn connection with Ms. Palmer’s appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer and President of Sallie Mae Bank, Mr. Kennedy ceased serving as Chief Operational Officer and President of Sallie Mae Bank effective January 9, 2023. Mr. Kennedy’s employment with the Company was terminated without cause on March 1, 2023.

32        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Compensation Practices Summary


What We Do

COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

What We Don’t Do

  Tie significant portions of compensation to Company performance

Utilize the 2022 AIP containing a formulaic funding mechanism (based on quantitative metrics) for annual bonuses

Utilize an LTIP with a significant weighting based on performance-based equity awards, including PSUs that vest solely based on relative TSR

Annually review and refine all compensation programs and policies based on feedback from stockholders, our Board of Directors, our independent compensation consultant, and market best practices

 

  

Compensation Practices Summary

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

ü  Tie significant portions of compensation to Company performance

üUtilize the 2019 MIP containing a formulaic funding mechanism (based on quantitative metrics) for annual bonuses

üUtilize an LTIP with a significant weighting toward PSUs that only deliver compensation based on achievement against rigorous quantitative goals

üAnnually review and refine all compensation programs and policies based on feedback from stockholders, our independent compensation consultant, and market best practices

ü  Mitigate risk-taking by utilizing equity awards vesting over a three-year period, while placing caps on potential payments and maintaining equity (as well as cash bonus) clawback provisions

üRequire significant share ownership by the CEO, Executive Vice Presidents, and Senior Vice Presidents

üNGC Committee, comprised only of independent directors, determines achievement of both corporate and individual performance of NEOs, as well as all aspects of their compensation and incentives

ü  Annually assess risk of significant employee incentive compensation plans

ü  Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise on market practices and specific compensation programs

×   Since 2014, no individual employment agreements have been entered into

×   No individualchange-in-control agreements

×   No “single-trigger”change-in-control agreements

×   No excise taxgross-ups

×   No hedging or pledging of Common Stock

×   No single-trigger accelerated settlement of equity awards

×   No above-market returns on deferred compensation plans

×   No pension benefits provided

Stockholder Engagement &Say-on-Pay Results

STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

Spring

Summer

Fall

Winter

•  Active outreach with institutional holders to discuss important governance items to be considered at Annual Meeting

•  Publish annual communications to stockholders including the proxy statement and Form10-K

•  Conduct Annual Meeting

•  Review results and feedback from Annual Meeting with institutional holders

•  Share investor feedback with the Board of Directors

•  Active outreach with institutional holders to discuss vote and follow up issues

•  Conduct annual Board of Directors assessment of governance

•  Active outreach with institutional holders to identify focus and priorities for the coming year

•  Perform peer group compensation analysis to ensure compensation is appropriate based on financial performance comparisons

•  Review governance practices and trends, regulatory developments, and our governance framework

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    27


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS  Mitigate risk-taking by utilizing equity awards vesting over a three-year period, while placing caps on potential payments and utilizing a one-year holding period following the vesting of PSUs granted in 2021, 2022 and 2023

 

  Maintain an adjustment policy (that includes clawbacks) with respect to incentive-based compensation, and retain clawback provisions with respect to equity-and cash-based awards

We engage with our stockholders

  Require significant share ownership by the CEO, Executive Vice Presidents, and proxy advisory firms throughout the year and provide stockholders with an annual opportunity to cast an advisorysay-on-pay vote. At our 2019 annual meetingSenior Vice Presidents

  Compensation Committee, comprised only of stockholders, approximately 96 percentindependent directors, determines achievement of the votes present voted in favorfunding metrics and individual performance of oursay-on-pay proposal. Additionally, in 2019 management reached out to investors owning a majority of the outstanding shares and discussed our executive compensation program and other compensation-related matters with a number of them. Through our stockholder engagement and strongsay-on-pay vote, we gathered important information on how our compensation policies could continue to improve and continued practices that encourage sustainable long-term growth. We continue to focus on performance-based compensation for our NEOs as we (i) tie a significant portion of total NEO compensationpertaining to the achievement of performance metrics and goals pursuant to the 2019 MIP and (ii) award a greater percentage of each NEO’s LTIP in the form of PSUs. In 2019, we increased the amount of PSUs awarded to NEOscash payouts under the LTIP from 25 percent to 50 percent. Stockholder engagement2022 AIP, as well as all aspects of their compensation and the outcome of thesay-on-pay vote results will continue to inform future compensation decisions.

HistoricalSay-on-Pay Voteincentives

 

Annual Meeting Year

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

ForSay-on-Pay Vote

 

86.8

%

 

87.1

%

 

89.6

%

 

92.2

%

 

96.0

%

Stock Performance  Annually assess risk of significant employee incentive compensation plans

Our stock generated a three-year total return for stockholders

  Retain an independent compensation consultant to advise on market practices and specific compensation programs

û   No individual change-in-control agreements

û   No “single-trigger” change-in-control agreements

û   No excise tax gross-ups

û   No hedging or pledging of negative 18.1 percent from 2017 through 2019, compared to 4.3Common Stock

û   No single-trigger accelerated settlement of equity awards

û   No above-market returns on deferred compensation plans

û   No pension benefits provided

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        33


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Stockholder Engagement & Say-on-Pay Results

Stockholder Engagement

LOGO

We engage with our stockholders and proxy advisory firms throughout the year and provide stockholders with an annual opportunity to cast an advisory say-on-pay vote. At our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 98.6 percent of the votes present voted in favor of our say-on-pay proposal. Through our stockholder engagement and strong say-on-pay vote, we gathered important information on how our compensation policies could continue to improve and continued practices that encourage sustainable long-term growth. We continue to focus on performance-based compensation for our NEOs as we (i) tie a significant portion of total NEO compensation to the achievement of performance metrics and goals pursuant to the AIP and (ii) award a significant percentage, set at 50 percent, of each NEO’s LTIP in the form of PSUs. Stockholder engagement and the outcome of the say-on-pay vote results will continue to inform future compensation decisions. Over the last five years, stockholders have strongly supported our executive compensation program, with 89% or more of the votes cast in support of the program each year.

Historical Say-on-Pay Vote

LOGO

Annual Meeting Year

  2018   2019   2020   2021   2022 

For Say-on-Pay Vote

   92.2   96.0   94.4   89.3   98.6

34        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Stock Performance

Our stock generated a three-year total return for stockholders of 95.7 percent from 2019 through 2022, compared to 3.2 percent for our peer group of companies, 23.2 percent for the S&P Supercomposite Consumer Finance Sub Industry Index, and 26.2 percent for the S&P 400 Regional Bank Sub-Industry Index. As of December 31, 2022, we ranked in the 90th percentile of total returns for the three-year period of our peer group.

Total Shareholder Return

12/31/19-12/31/22

LOGO

*

For the full roster of members of our peer group, of companies, 36.0 percent forplease refer to the S&P Supercomposite Consumer Finance Sub Industry Index, and 3.0 percent for the S&P 400 Regional BankSub-Industry Index. As of December 31, 2019, we ranked in the 5th percentile of total returns for the three-year period of our peer group.section below on page 48 entitled “Peer Group Analysis.”

Total Shareholder Return

12/31/16-12/31/19

LOGO

Over the last three years, Total Assets have decreased by 11.9 percent and GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Common Share has increased by 35 percent.

Highlights of Company Performance

 

*

For the full roster of members of our peer group, please refer to the section below on page 43 entitled “Peer Group Analysis.”

Over the last three years, we have increased Total Assets by 76 percent and Diluted Earnings Per Common Share by 145 percent. During this three-year period, the Total Shareholder Return for the Company was negative 18.1 percent.

Highlights of Company Performance

2019 Net Income Attributable to Common Stock (calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)) of $561 million as compared to $472 million in the prior year.

$1.30 Diluted Earnings Per Common Share for 2019 as compared to $1.07 for the prior year.

Private Education Loan Originations of $5.6 billion in 2019 as compared to $5.3 billion in 2018, a six

2022 Net Income Attributable to Common Stock (calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)) of $460 million, as compared to $1,156 million in the prior year.

$1.76 GAAP Diluted Earnings Per Common Share for 2022, as compared to $3.61 for the prior year.

Private Education Loan Originations of $6.0 billion in 2022, as compared to $5.4 billion in 2021, a 10 percent increase year-over-year.

 

Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio, net, totaled $19.0 billion as of December 31, 2022, as compared to $19.6 billion as of December 31, 2021, a 3.1 percent decrease year-over-year.*

2022 Full-Year Net Interest Margin of 5.31 percent, up from 4.81 percent in Full-Year 2021.

40 million shares of Common Stock were repurchased in 2022, a 14 percent reduction in total Common Stock outstanding since January 1, 2022.

Total Assets of $28.8 billion as of December 31, 2022, as compared to $29.2 billion as of December 31, 2021.**

*

The decrease in the Private Education Loan portfolio net, totaled $22.9 billion at December 31, 2019,is primarily related to loan sales during 2022 and an increase in the allowance for loan losses during 2022 primarily as a 13 percent increase from December 31, 2018.result of new loan commitments made during the period, slower prepayment rates, and additional management overlays, which were partially offset by negative provisions recorded for loans sold.

 

**

The decrease in Total Assets of $32.7 billion at December 31, 2019 as comparedfrom 2021 to $26.6 billion at December 31, 2018.

28    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Achievement of 2019 Management Objectives

In 2019, we set out2022 was primarily due to the following major goals for ourselves: (1) prudently grow ourdecrease in the Private Education Loan assets and revenues; (2) maintain our strong capital position; (3) continue our Personal Loan1 and credit card initiatives to increase the level of engagement with our existing customers and attract new customers; (4) manage operating expenses while improving efficiency; (5) maintain our strong governance, risk oversight and compliance infrastructure; and (6) leverage our culture to engage employees, recognize and reward contributions to business results, and develop talent to support our business strategy and growth.

Management Objective

Highlights

Prudently Grow Private Education Loan Assets and Revenues

•  We pursued managed growth in our Private Education Loan portfolio in 2019 by leveraging our Sallie Mae brand, our relationship with approximately 2,400 colleges and universities, and our direct consumer marketing efforts. We achieved our goal of growing loan originations while maintaining overall credit quality and cosigner rates in our Smart Option Student Loan originations. Private Education Loan originations were 6 percent higher in 2019 compared with 2018. The average FICO scores at approval and the cosigner rates for originations in the year ended December 31, 2019 were 746 and 86.6 percent, compared with 746 and 87.2 percent for originations in the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. In addition, to help facilitate the expected increase in our Private Education Loan originations and the increasing percentage of fixed-rate loans being selected by our customers, we maintained our diversified funding base in 2019. In 2019, we completed two asset-backed securities (“ABS”) secured financings totaling $1.1 billion compared with three ABS secured financings totaling $1.9 billion in 2018. We also raised fixed-rate brokered certificates of deposit in longer terms to manage potential interest rate risk.

Maintain Our Strong Capital Position

•  As our balance sheet grew in 2019, our regulatory capital ratios remained stable and we generated earnings and capital sufficient to cover the growth in our risk-weighted assets and remain significantly in excess of the capital levels required to be considered “well capitalized” by our regulators. As of December 31, 2019, the Bank had a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 12.2 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 12.2 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 13.4 percent and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 10.2 percent, all exceeding the current regulatory guidelines for “well capitalized” institutions by a significant amount.

Continue our Personal Loan and Credit Card Initiatives to Increase the Level of Engagement With Our Existing Customers and Attract New Customers

•  In June 2019, we launched our suite of cash-back credit cards with unique bonus rewards designed to help cardholders develop financially responsible habits. We ended 2019 with 4,100 accounts. Early indications show strong customer engagement key performance indicators with an over 84 percent plastic activation rate and, of those activated, 74 percent utilized the card for purchases in 2019. The average FICO score at approval was 722 with an average credit line of over $4,600, both in line with our expectations.

•  In 2019, we originated $480 million of Personal Loans. However, in the fourth quarter of 2019, we elected to discontinue new originations to focus resources on our core strategic priorities and do not expect to originate or purchase any additional Personal Loans in 2020. We processed completed Personal Loan applications received by December 15, 2019 and continue to provide Personal Loan customers with the high-quality service they have come to expect. Our organic Personal Loan pilot produced valuable information and we will continue to monitor the performance of the portfolio as it seasons. Our test and learn approach on Personal Loans has helped us better understand the challenges and opportunities related to this product, which drove numerous data centric adjustments that improved both our underwriting and targeting strategies.

portfolio, noted above.

 

(1)

Personal Loans are defined as unsecured personal loans used fornon-educational purposes.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    29


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        35


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Allocation of Compensation

The charts below illustrate, for our CEO and separately for the other NEOs in aggregate, the percentage of 2022 compensation that consisted of base salaries, target annual bonuses (determined and paid in cash in early 2023), and LTIP awards of RSUs and PSUs granted in early 2022.

 

 

Management Objective

Highlights

Manage Operating Expenses While Improving Efficiency

•  We measure our effectiveness in managing operating expenses by monitoring ournon-GAAP operating efficiency ratio2. Full-year 2019non-interest expenses grew 3 percent year-over-year, while thenon-GAAP operating efficiency ratio was 34.7 percent for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared with 41.0 percent for the year ended December 31, 2018. Thenon-GAAP operating efficiency ratio for the year ended December 31, 2018 was unfavorably affected by a $94 million decrease in other income due to a decrease in our tax indemnification receivable arising from the expiration of certain statutes of limitations regarding certain indemnified uncertain tax positions. Excluding this item, thenon-GAAP operating efficiency ratio would have been 38.3 percent for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Maintain Our Strong Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance Infrastructure

•  We maintain a strong governance framework, which includes robust oversight, education, policies and procedures supported by Enterprise Risk Management, Compliance and Internal Audit functions. In addition, given our relentless focus on customer experience, we continually monitor customer protection policies, procedures and compliance management systems, all of which are currently sufficient to meet or exceed currently applicable regulatory standards. Our goal is to leverage the governance framework to create further value and competitive advantage in the marketplace.

Leverage Our Culture to Engage Employees, Recognize and Reward Contributions to Business Results, and Develop Talent to Support our Business Strategy and Growth

•  In 2019, we continued to focus on providing tools and resources to enable employee growth and development of our core and leadership competencies. We improved the effectiveness of our annual performance review process by adding an assessment of our competencies and the related behaviors to further differentiate performance and effectively recognize and reward contributions. We launched a program that provides employees the opportunity to expand their knowledge and capability by temporarily transferring to a role in a different area of the business. In addition, we continued to drive completion of multi-rater performance assessments and development planning in support of our management succession plan.

For additional information with regard to each of these objectives and their achievement, see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in the Company’s 2019 Form10-K.

LOGO

 

(2)

For a description of how we calculate operating efficiency ratio, see Part II, Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Financial Measures—Operating Expenses” in the Company’s 2019 Form10-K.

30    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Allocation of Compensation

The charts below illustrate, for our former CEO and separately for the other NEOs in aggregate, the percentage of 2019 compensation that consisted of base salaries, annual bonuses (determined and paid in cash in early 2020), and LTIP awards of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and PSUs granted in early 2019.

36        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

LOGO

LOGO

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    31


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Elements of Compensation

The compensation program in 2019

Elements of Compensation

The compensation program in 2022 for our NEOs consisted of seven elements. These elements, as well as the reasons why each was chosen and the ways in which each achieves our compensation objectives, are described below:

 

Compensation Element

Description

Objective

Base Salary

Fixed cash compensation. Reviewed annually and adjusted as appropriate.

To provide a base level of cash compensation for senior executives based on level and responsibility.

Annual Incentive Bonus

Variable compensation. Annual bonus amounts for 2019 have been determined based on corporate and individual performance components. Corporate performance metrics were derived from management’s 2019 objectives identified in our annual business plan. Bonuses are payable in cash.

To encourage and reward senior executives for achieving annual corporate performance and individual goals.

Long-Term
Equity-Based  

Incentives

RSUs and PSUs

Multi-year variable compensation. Generally granted annually. In 2019, the long-term equity-based incentive plan for the NEOs was further revised from 2018 to increase the proportion of PSUs, and 2019 awards consisted of 50 percent RSUs that vest inone-third increments over a three-year period and 50 percent PSUs (an increase from 25 percent from the prior year) that cliff vest in three years. The 2019 PSUs vest based upon (i) cumulative charge-offs from 2019-2021 of the cohort of Private Education Loans first entering full principal and interest repayment status during the fourth-quarter of 2018 (50 percent weight) and(ii) pre-tax,pre-provision income at the end of 2021 (50 percent weight); with the total payout subject to a total shareholder return (from 2019-2021) modifier.

To motivate and retain senior executives by aligning their interests with that of stockholders through sustained performance and growth.

Other

Health, welfare, and
retirement benefits

Fixed compensation. Company subsidies and matching contributions, respectively.

To promote employee health and protect financial security.

Deferred Compensation
Plan and Supplemental

401(k) Savings Plan

Retirement benefit. The Sallie Mae Deferred Compensation Plan and the Supplemental 401(k) Savings Plan provide our highly compensated executives with a vehicle into which they can opt to defer a portion of their compensation for retirement. These opportunities are provided in lieu of any pension benefit plans.

To provide retirement planning opportunities.

Severance benefits

Fixed cash compensation-based severance payments. Equity awards generally continue to vest on their terms after changes of control, involuntary terminations other than for cause, or if the grantee voluntarily ceases employment and meets our retirement eligibility requirements. For more information, see “Arrangements with Named Executive Officers” below on page 55.

To maintain continuity of management in light of major restructurings or after a change of control and provide temporary income following involuntary terminations of employment other than for cause.

Perquisites

Fixed compensation. Consists primarily of executive physical examinations and, in limited instances, directed charitable giving made by an affiliate, The Sallie Mae Fund, upon request of our employees.

To provide business-related benefits to assist in attracting and retaining key executives.

32    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

LOGO

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        37


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

How Our Compensation Decisions Are Made

LOGO

 

    

How Our Compensation Decisions Are Made

Participant

Roles

Board of Directors

•  Independent members establish CEO’s compensation based on findings and recommendations of NGC Committee and Lead Independent Director.

•  Receives report from NGC Committee with respect to annual MIP target achievement, bonus pool funding, and PSU progress.

NGC Committee

•  Sets annual MIP and PSU targets and approves NEO individual performance goals at the beginning of each year.

•  Establishes annual long-term equity-based incentive plan awards for senior executives, including NEOs, and establishes related performance-based metrics.

•  Retains independent compensation consultant on annual basis.

•  Establishes peer group for comparative compensation data purposes.

•  Participates with Lead Independent Director in the annual performance and compensation review of CEO and recommendation to the Board of Directors.

•  Reviews and approves all aspects of NEO compensation.

•  Approves and/or certifies annual achievement of MIP targets, PSU targets, aggregate MIP bonus pool, and NEO individual performance goals.

Lead Independent Director

•  Participates in development and delivery of CEO’s performance and compensation review.

NGC Committee Chair

•  Participates in development and delivery of CEO’s performance and compensation review.

•  Participates with CEO in final review and approval of all individual MIP and LTIP awards to all eligible senior executives other than NEOs.

Chief Executive Officer

•  Reviews performance of all other NEOs with NGC Committee and makes recommendations with regard to their salaries, bonuses, and LTIP awards.

• ���Participates with NGC Committee Chair in final review and approval of all individual MIP and LTIP awards to all eligible senior executives other than NEOs.

Compensation Consultant

•  Assists the NGC Committee in the review and oversight of all aspects of our executive compensation programs, particularly as they relate to the development and interpretation of peer group membership, compensation data, and the design and implementation of executive compensation programs in light of prevailing regulatory and market practices.

Chief Risk Officer

•  Conducts a risk assessment prior to the adoption of, and payment pursuant to, any employee incentive compensation plan to ascertain any potential material risks that may be created by such plan.

 

In establishingParticipant

Roles

Board of Directors

•  Independent members establish CEO’s compensation levelsbased on findings and structures, policies,recommendations of Compensation Committee and Independent Board Chair.

•  Receives report from Compensation Committee with respect to annual AIP target achievements, bonus pool funding, and PSU progress.

Compensation Committee

•  Sets AIP and PSU targets and approves NEO individual performance goals at the beginning of each year.

•  Establishes annual long-term, equity-based incentive plan awards for 2019,employees, including NEOs, and establishes related performance-based metrics.

•  Retains independent compensation consultant on annual basis.

•  Establishes peer group for comparative compensation data purposes.

•  Participates with Independent Board Chair in the NGCannual performance and compensation review of CEO and recommendation to the Board of Directors.

•  Reviews and approves all aspects of NEO compensation, excluding the CEO.

•  Reviews and recommends CEO compensation to the Board of Directors for approval.

•  Approves and/or certifies annual achievement of AIP targets, PSU targets, aggregate AIP bonus pool, and NEO individual performance goals.

•  Reviews compensation of covered employees consisting of senior executive officers and other significant risk takers as defined by management.

•  Reviews and/or approves AIP and LTIP awards to all eligible employees.

Independent Board Chair

•  Participates in development and delivery of CEO’s performance and compensation review.

Compensation Committee also consideredChair 

•  Participates in development and delivery of CEO’s performance and compensation review.

Chief Executive Officer

•  Reviews performance of all other NEOs with Compensation Committee and makes recommendations with regard to their salaries, bonuses, and LTIP awards.

•  Participates with Compensation Committee in final review and/or approval of AIP and LTIP awards to all eligible employees, other than the CEO.

Compensation Consultant

•  Assists the Compensation Committee in the review and oversight of all aspects of our executive compensation programs, particularly as they relate to the development and interpretation of peer group membership, compensation data, and the design and implementation of executive compensation programs in light of prevailing regulatory and market practices.

Chief Risk Officer

•  Conducts a (i) risk assessment prior to the adoption of employee incentive compensation plans to identify potential material risks that may be created by such plans;(ii) quarterly risk review of performance against incentive compensation plans; and (iii) backward-looking review and attestation of the achievement of metrics associated with incentive compensation plans and the method by which the results were achieved, prior to payment pursuant to those plans.

Audit Committee

•  With the Compensation Committee, reviews and approves the goals and compensation of the annual“say-on-pay” advisory vote of stockholders, which receivedChief Audit Officer.

Financial Risk Committee

•  Reviews the approval of approximately 96.0 percentgoals and compensation of the shares present in person or represented by proxyChief Risk Officer.

Operational and entitled to vote onCompliance Risk Committee

•  Reviews the matter at our 2019 annual meetinggoals and compensation of the Chief Risk Officer.

38        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In establishing compensation levels and structures, policies, and performance for 2022, the Compensation Committee also considered the results of the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders“say-on-pay” advisory vote of stockholders, which received the approval of approximately 98.6 percent of the holders of the Common Stock present or represented, and entitled to vote thereon, and recommendations from stockholders as part of our stockholder outreach. Given the results of the stockholder advisory vote, the Compensation Committee’s ongoing review of our compensation programs, and feedback from our stockholders, the Compensation Committee believes our existing executive compensation programs effectively align the interests of our NEOs with our short-term and long-term goals.

Base Salary Determinations

The following factors are considered in determining any base salary adjustments for our NEOs:

Scope and responsibility of the NEO’s position;

Achievement of annual business goals, and individual performance goals;

Overall compensation paid by competitors for comparable positions;

Recruitment, retention and development of leadership talent; and

The appropriate balancing of each NEO’s base salary against his or her incentive compensation.

Based on these factors, our NEOs’ base salaries were adjusted during fiscal year 2022 as follows:    

LOGO

Named Executive Officer

  2021 Base
Salary ($)
   2022 Base
Salary ($)
   %
Increase
 

Jonathan W. Witter

   950,000    1,100,000    15.8

Steven J. McGarry

   500,000    515,000    3.0

Kerri A. Palmer

   550,000    566,500    3.0

Daniel P. Kennedy

   475,000    489,250    3.0

Donna F. Vieira

   475,000    489,250    3.0

The increase of each of the NEO’s base salary was intended to (i) ensure his or her compensation remains competitive with the market and (ii) recognize his or her respective performance as well as the Company’s performance in 2021.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        39


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2022 Annual Incentive Plan for Named Executive Officers

LOGO

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    33


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

    

 

2019 Management Incentive Plan for Named Executive Officers

The following are highlights of the 2019 MIP:2022 AIP:

 

Under the 2019 MIP, the NEOs’ annual bonuses were paid 100 percent in cash.

Core Net Operating Income served as the performance metric for establishing the initial funding pool at 200 percent of target for the 2019 MIP, which is then adjusted downward based on the underlying plan metrics described below.

Annual bonus awards for NEOs under the 2019 MIP were determined based on an 80 percent corporate performance component and a 20 percent individual performance component.

•  The following six corporate goalsfour funding metrics were utilized under the 2019 MIP2022 AIP at the following weightings:

 

Core Earnings•  Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share (35Share* (40 percent)

 

•  Private Education Loan Originations (25 percent)

 

•  Operating Efficiency Ratio (20Expenses (25 percent)

 

Gross Private Education Loan Defaults as a Percentage of Average Loan Balances in Repayment•  Net Charge-Offs (10 percent)

 

Weighted Average Origination FICO Score for Private Education Loans (5 percent)

Customer Ease (5 percent)

•  Each NEO in the 2019 MIP2022 AIP had an established target bonus opportunity as set by the Compensation Committee, with no guaranteed minimum (i.e., the actual bonus payout could be 0 percent of target).

 

•  Included a clawback and risk adjustment provision.

 

•  Chief Risk Officer completed a risk assessment and attestation of the 2019 MIP.

Management Incentive Plan Goal Setting

Each year, management develops a rigorous business plan that reflects the Company’s strategy for achieving operating and financial results to enhance franchise value while prudently growing our business. The Company’s business plan was the source2022 AIP as well as quarterly qualitative risk reviews of the performance goals approved byagainst the NGC Committee2022 AIP funding metrics.

•  Under the 2022 AIP, the NEOs’ annual bonuses were paid in cash.

*  See “Appendix A – Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for purposesa more detailed explanation of setting our 2019 MIP targets. These performance goals were carefully analyzed“Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share” and subjecta reconciliation to considerable review by the NGC Committee, with the advice of its independent compensation consultant.

Since our April 2014 separation from Navient, we have been able to consistently enhance franchise value by growing assets and earnings, maintaining conservative credit standards, and providing excellent customer service. As a financial institution, our targets for the 2019 MIP were designed to balance asset growth, credit quality, operating efficiency, risk management, and customer satisfaction, by utilizing a mix of financial metrics (coreGAAP diluted earnings per share and operating efficiency ratio), customer growth metrics (private credit loan originations and customer ease) and credit quality metrics (weighted average origination FICO and gross Private Education Loan defaults as a percentage of average loan balances in repayment).share.

In selecting objective performance metrics and establishing challenging target, threshold, and maximum levels of required performance, the NGC Committee considered the upcoming year’s business objectives and outlook in light of the unique dynamics of the consumer-banking sector at that point in time. Rather than only examining and relying upon the prior year’s targets and actual results—which may not reflect the current year’s changes to our strategic business plan—and challenges affecting our industry, the NGC Committee’s goal setting considers particular and timely market trends that are likely to impact our business based on current activity, as well as our Company’s projected growth and other factors specific to our business.

Core Net Operating Income served as the performance metric for establishing the initial funding pool at 200 percent of target for the 2019 MIP. The NGC Committee used that financial metric for the initial bonus pool funding because it reflects the Company’s performance for the year at the broadest level. The Company calculated Core Net Operating Income for 2019 as the sum of (a) Core Earnings attributable to the Company’s Common Stock and (b) preferred stock dividends paid by the Company in 2019. For a description of how we calculate “Core Earnings” and for a reconciliation of “Core Earnings” to the nearest comparable GAAP measure, see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations-Key Financial Measures-Core Earnings” in our 2019 Form10-K. Based on forecasted financial results, the Core Net Operating Income target for the 2019 MIP was set at $450.8 million. This represents an increase of $90.7 million from the $360.1 million target for the 2018 MIP. Based upon the Company’s satisfaction of the Core Net Operating Income target that had been set, the 2019 MIP funding pool was funded at 200 percent of target.

34    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Then, a combination of corporate metrics and individual performance goals were used to guide the NGC Committee in its exercise of downward discretion for determining the final awards to the NEOs. For the NEOs, the corporate and individual performance components of their bonus targets were 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively.

For the corporate performance portion of the 2019 MIP, six corporate performance metrics were utilized. As discussed above, these metrics were derived from management’s 2019


Annual Incentive Plan Goal Setting

Each year, management develops a rigorous business plan that reflects the Company’s strategy for achieving operating and financial results to enhance franchise value while prudently growing our business. The Company’s business plan was the source of the performance goals approved by the Compensation Committee for purposes of setting our 2022 AIP targets and funding metrics. These performance goals were carefully analyzed and subject to considerable review by the Compensation Committee, with the advice of its independent compensation consultant.

Since establishing Sallie Mae as a stand-alone consumer bank in April 2014, we generally have been able to consistently enhance franchise value by growing assets and earnings, maintaining conservative credit standards, and providing excellent customer service. As a financial institution, our funding metrics for the 2022 AIP were designed to balance asset growth, credit quality, operating expenses, and risk management by utilizing a mix of financial metrics (pre-tax, pre-provision, pre-operating expense income per share and operating expenses), a customer growth metric (private education loan originations), and a credit quality metric (net charge-offs).

In selecting objective performance metrics and establishing challenging target, threshold, and maximum levels, the Compensation Committee considered the upcoming year’s business objectives and outlook in light of the unique dynamics of the consumer-banking sector at that point in time. Rather than only examining and relying upon the prior year’s targets and actual results—which may not reflect the current year’s changes to our strategic business plan—and challenges affecting our industry, the Compensation Committee’s goal setting considers particular and timely market trends that are likely to impact our business based on current activity, as well as our Company’s projected growth and other factors specific to our business.

Four corporate metrics were established by the Compensation Committee to determine the funding of the 2022 AIP.

40        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

As discussed above, these four metrics were derived from management’s 2022 objectives identified in our annual business plan. These metrics, their rationale, and the weightings at which they were set are discussed in the table below:

 

METRIC

WEIGHTING

RATIONALE FOR USING EACH METRIC

Core Earnings Per Share

35%

This is the primary metric used by management and investors to measure the Company’s success for the year.

LOGO

    

For 2019, the NGC Committee approved a target of $1.266 for Core Earnings Per Share, an approximately 28 percent increase from the 2018 target of $0.986.

Private Education Loan Originations

25%

This measurement serves as a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.

For 2019, the NGC Committee approved a target of $5.7 billion for Private Education Loan Originations, an increase from the $5 billion target in 2018.

Operating Efficiency Ratio

20%

This is a key measurement to evaluate the expense discipline of the Company regarding costs attributable to running our business, building out our servicing and origination platforms, and investing in new products. This ratio motivates management to ensure that these expenses generate the expected amount of revenues to keep this ratio at or below plan.

For 2019, the “operating expenses” metric was changed to “operating efficiency ratio.” Management believes that the operating efficiency ratio is a better measure of success in expense management for 2019 because, while management may drive additional revenue, this revenue may also come with additional expenses. In an environment with no loan sales or unusual transactions that significantly cause earnings or expenses to fluctuate, operating efficiency ratio is a superior measure. The operating efficiency ratio takes into account the potential profitability of additional spending. Using operating expenses alone as a measure could penalize management for identifying and executing on opportunities that drive an increase in revenue but also drive an increase in operating costs.

For 2019, the NGC Committee approved an operating efficiency ratio target of 34.7 percent. In 2018, the operating efficiency ratio of the Company was 41.0 percent. The operating efficiency ratio for 2018 was unfavorably affected by a $94 million decrease in other income due to a decrease in our tax indemnification receivable arising from the expiration of certain statutes of limitations regarding certain indemnified uncertain tax positions. Excluding this item, the operating efficiency ratio for 2018 would have been 38.3 percent. For 2019, the NGC Committee approved an operating efficiency ratio target of 34.7 percent as we assumed a minimal increase in our expenses as we focused on prudently managing our costs.

Gross Private Education Loan Defaults as a Percentage of Average Loan Balances in Repayment

10%

This metric is used to measure the credit performance of our Private Education Loan portfolio, a significant indicator of the health of our business.

For 2019, the NGC Committee approved a target of 1.33 percent for Gross Private Education Loan Defaults, a decrease from the 1.53 percent target in 2018. The decrease was attributable to the improved Private Education Loan portfolio performance in the prior year.

METRIC

WEIGHTINGRATIONALE FOR USING EACH METRIC

Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share

40

This is a primary metric used by management to measure internally the Company’s performance for the year. This measure allows management to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to generate earnings from its primary business.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    35

Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share is a non-GAAP measure. The determination of Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share for 2022 starts with GAAP diluted earnings per common share for 2022, increases that amount by (i) the impact of the GAAP provision for credit losses per common share for 2022, (ii) the impact the GAAP total non-interest expense per common share for 2022, (iii) the impact of the GAAP income tax expense per common share for 2022, and (iv) the impact of GAAP preferred stock dividends per common share for 2022. See Appendix A – Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a more detailed explanation of Non-GAAP “Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share” and a reconciliation to GAAP diluted earnings per common share.


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSISFor 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a target of $7.15 for Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share. The 2022 target was set using, among other items, the gain expected to be recognized by the Company on the potential sale of certain Private Education Loans in 2022 and the expected impact of potential share repurchases in 2022.

Private Education Loan Originations

25

This measurement serves as a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.

For 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a target of $5.95 billion for Private Education Loan Originations, a 4.4 percent increase from the $5.7 billion target in 2021, due to the increase in students returning to campus.

Operating Expenses

25

This is a key measurement to evaluate the expense discipline of the Company regarding costs attributable to running our business.

For 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a target of $560 million for Operating Expenses, a 5.7 percent increase from the $530 million target in 2021, due to increased spending to drive strategic initiatives and loan volume as well as invest in human capital.

Net Charge-Offs

10

This metric is used to measure the credit performance of our loan portfolio, a significant indicator of the health of our business.

For 2022, the Compensation Committee, approved a target of $265 million for Net Charge-Offs, a 1.9 percent decrease from the $270 million target in 2021, which was forecasted using historical roll rate performance applied to expected Private Education Loan repayment balances.

Minimum, target, and maximum achievement levels were set for each performance metric and a weight assigned to each performance metric based on its relative importance to our overall operating plan. Our NEOs were each eligible to receive bonuses up to a stated maximum percentage of their base salary, not to exceed $5 million, assuming the initial funding threshold was achieved.

2022 AIP Funding and Payout Computation

In May 2022, the Compensation Committee established the bonus pool funding metrics. In February 2023, the Compensation Committee, including the independent Board Chair, reviewed our relative achievement of the previously established bonus pool funding metrics, and after discussions with our CEO, determined that for the year ended December 31, 2022 the bonus pool should be funded at 94.9 percent based on the achievement of the four funding metrics as summarized in the table below.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        41


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Application of the 2022 AIP funding score, based on the four funding metrics approved in May 2022, resulted in the following:

(Dollars in Millions, except per share amounts)

LOGO

 

    

Funding Metric

  Min   Target   Max   

Actual

Performance

  

Award

Factor

  Weighting  

Funding
Metric

Score

 

Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share

  $6.40   $7.15   $7.90   $7.20(1)   107  40  42.8

Private Education Loan Originations

  $5,500   $5,950   $6,500   $5,975   105  25  26.3

Operating Expenses

  $610   $560   $510   $558   103  25  25.8

Net Charge-Offs(2)

  $290   $265   $240   $390   0  10  0

Total

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  94.9

(1)

Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share is a Non-GAAP metric under the 2022 AIP that is derived from GAAP net income. In considering the achievement of the Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income Per Share metric under the 2022 AIP, the Compensation Committee, when reviewing the funding of the 2022 AIP, approved certain modifications to the calculation of this Non-GAAP metric to omit the negative impact of deterioration in the valuation of certain non-marketable securities owned by the Company. Those modifications resulted in the actual performance under the modified Non-GAAP metric used for purposes of the funding of the 2022 AIP changing from $6.97 to $7.20. See Appendix A for a reconciliation.

METRIC

WEIGHTING
(2)

The Company did not achieve the Net Charge-Offs target as a result of a combination of factors, including the previously announced credit administration practices changes the Company implemented in 2021 that imposed additional requirements for those borrowers requesting forbearance, as well as a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges during much of 2022.

RATIONALE FOR USING EACH METRIC

Weighted Average Origination FICO Score for Private Education Loans

5%

This metric serves as a key measurement of credit quality for Private Education Loans originated in the current year. This metric is used to ensure the consistency of our underwriting standards and confirm that our parameters are not loosened in a way that will reduce Private Education Loan portfolio credit quality.

With a 2022 AIP funding score of 94.9 percent, the Compensation Committee assessed each NEO’s individual performance against outcome-based goals as further detailed in the section titled “NEO Achievements” below. Each NEO’s respective individual performance was assessed during the annual performance review and covered employees risk review, in the following three areas: (i) delivering against investor expectations; (ii) executing our strategic imperatives; and (iii) enhancing the general strength of the organization. With respect to the 2022 AIP, as in prior years, the Compensation Committee had discretion to increase or reduce any bonus amount, including down to zero, that would otherwise be earned or payable to any participant and to take into account assessment of any other additional factors. The annual bonus payment to each NEO under the 2022 AIP is set forth below.

LOGO

Named Executive Officer

  

Target Bonus

as a % of

Base Salary

  

2022

Target Bonus
$ Amount

   2022 AIP
Payout
 

Jonathan W. Witter

   150 $1,650,000   $1,320,000 

Steven J. McGarry

   150 $772,500   $733,875 

Kerri A. Palmer

   125 $708,125   $920,563 

Daniel P. Kennedy

   125 $611,563   $489,250 

Donna F. Vieira

   125 $611,563   $672,719 

42        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2022 NEO Long-Term Incentive Program

In connection with our 2022 NEO LTIP awards, the Compensation Committee utilized a combination of (i) 50 percent RSUs vesting in one-third increments over each anniversary of the grant date, and (ii) 50 percent PSUs vesting in 2025 upon certification by the Compensation Committee as to the achievement of the relative TSR performance metric with a one-year holding period after vesting as described in more detail below, Our 2022 LTIP grants are intended to provide long-term incentive and performance-based compensation to our NEOs in order to retain and attract highly qualified executives and tie their performance to the performance of our Company, thus aligning their interests with the interests of our stockholders.

 

For 2019, the NGC Committee retained its 2018 target of 745 for its Weighted Average Origination FICO Score for Private Education Loans. The NGC Committee determined a Weighted Average Origination FICO of 745 should continue to ensure that the credit parameters are not loosened in a way that would reduce Private Education Loan portfolio quality.

Customer Ease

5%

To better align with the industry and ensure that we measure the ease with which customers engage and receive service from us, this metric is used to measure the customer experience. Customer Ease is calculated as the inverse of the following: Calls into Service and Sales Agents divided by (Calls + Online Servicing Logins + Mobile Logins + Online Application Visits).

For 2019, the NGC Committee approved a target of 93.5 percent for Customer Ease, an increase from the 92 percent target in 2018.

Minimum, target, and maximum achievement levels were set for each performance metric and a weight assigned to each performance metric based on its relative importance to our overall operating plan. OurLOGO

•  For the NEOs, were each eligible to receive bonuses up to a stated maximum percentage of their base salary, not to exceed $5 million, assuming the initial funding threshold is achieved.including Mr. Witter, we granted PSUs that:

 

36    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement

•  vest between 0 percent and 200 percent in 2025 based on the Company’s relative TSR from February 18, 2022 to February 18, 2025;


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS•  vest upon the Compensation Committee’s determination of actual performance relative to pre-established targets; and

•  require a one-year holding period immediately following the vesting date of the PSUs.

Relative TSR

We believe relative TSR, the sole PSU performance metric, is important because it aligns the interests of our management with those of our stockholders. Our relative TSR will be evaluated by comparing the Company’s stock price performance to a defined set of comparable companies based on size, volatility, stock price correlation, and industry.

We annually review the metrics (and related target levels) used in our long-term incentive programs to ensure they remain aligned with our strategic plan and the interest of our stockholders. The PSU goal is derived from a rigorous process that involved input and discussions among the Compensation Committee, our CEO, human resources, finance personnel, risk management, legal, and the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.

The table below sets forth the value of LTIP awards granted in February 2022(1):

LOGO

Named Executive Officer

  

2022 LTIP

RSUs

($)

   

2022 LTIP

PSUs(2)

($)

   

2022 LTIP

Total(3)

($)

 

Jonathan W. Witter

  $2,500,000   $2,500,000   $5,000,000 

Steven J. McGarry

  $450,000   $450,000   $900,000 

Kerri A. Palmer

  $350,000   $350,000   $700,000 

Daniel P. Kennedy

  $450,000   $450,000   $900,000 

Donna F. Vieira

  $425,000   $425,000   $850,000 

(1)

The dollar value amounts of the respective LTIP awards granted to each of the NEOs in 2022 as shown in this table differ from the Summary Compensation Table and the 2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table disclosure due to differences in the accounting valuation of the equity awards on the grant date.

(2)

PSUs granted in 2022 to NEOs are disclosed in this column at the target level. PSUs will vest between 0 percent to 200 percent in 2025 based on relative TSR from February 18, 2022 to February 18, 2025, with a one-year holding period after vesting.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        43


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

NEO Achievements

Material factors considered in the Committee’s assessment of individual performance for 2022 include:

LOGO

 

    

2019 MIP ComputationNEO

ACHIEVEMENTS

Jonathan W. Witter,

In February 2019,Director and Chief Executive Officer

•  Delivered key performance objectives including (i) growing originations and market share, (ii) expanding Net Interest Margin, (iii) executing our loan sale/share repurchase program, and (iv) rigorously managing expenses driving improvement in unit service and acquisition costs;

•  Successfully integrated the NGC Committee establishedNitro College acquisition by significantly enhancing our reach to current and prospective college students and their parents through financing options, tools, and resources to power confidence in their higher education journey;

•  Enhanced risk management capabilities across the bonus pool fundingCompany through process, data, and corporate performance goals. In January 2020,model governance improvements as well as strengthening our risk management culture; and

•  Continued to positively inform the NGC Committeepublic discussion about student lending by delivering nearly 50 million impressions to key policy makers and influencers.

Steven J. McGarry,

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

•  Led the Lead Independent Director reviewed our relative achievement of the previously established bonus pool funding and corporate performance goals, and after discussions with our former CEO, determined that for the year ended December 31, 2019:Company’s efforts to create shareholder value by successfully managing (i) the bonus pool should be funded at the maximum levelsale of 200 percent of target based on the achievement of Core Net Operating Income of $563.6 million; and (ii) the weighted achievement of the 2019 MIP corporate performance goals was attained at a level of 97.0 percent of the targets set under the 2019 MIP.

Application of the 2019 MIP score, based on the corporate performance goals approved in February 2019, resulted in the following outcomes:

       
  Corporate Performance GoalMinTargetMax

Actual

Performance

Award

Factor

Weighting

Corporate

Performance

Score

Core Earnings Per Share

$1.166$1.266$1.366$1.269 102%  35% 35.6%

Private Education Loan Originations(1)

$5,450$5,700$5,950$5,625 85%  25% 21.2%

Operating Efficiency Ratio(2)

 38.2%  34.7%  31.2%  34.7%  99%  20% 19.8%

Gross Private Education Loan Defaults (as % of Average Loan Balances in Repayment)(3)

 1.74%  1.33%  0.91%  1.34%  98%  10% 9.8%

Customer Ease(4)

 87%  93.5%  100%  94.8%  110%  5% 5.5%

Weighted Average Origination FICO Score for Private Education Loans

 735 745 755 746 101%  5% 5.1%

Total

 97.0%

(1)

The Company did not achieve the private education loan originations target as a result of application variances to plan from March through July in 2019 as well as a shift in disbursement timing of $43 million from December 2019 to January 2020.

(2)

The Company nearly missed the operating efficiency ratio target because of slightly lower fee income than planned.

(3)

The Company nearly missed the gross private education loan defaults (as a percentage of average loan balances in repayment) target as a result of slightly lower average loan balances in repayment than planned.

(4)

As defined in the section above titled “2019 Management Incentive Plan for Named Executive Officers.”

Applying the 2019 MIP score of 97.0 percent and the NGC Committee’s assessment of each NEO’s individual achievements, which are discussed in further detail in the section titled “NEO Achievements” below, the annual bonus payment to each NEO under the 2019 MIP and its components are set forth below.

     

Named Executive Officer

Target Bonus

as a % of

Base Salary

2019

Target Bonus
$ Amount

2019 Corporate

Performance Bonus

Component(1)

2019 Individual

Performance Bonus

Component

2019 Total

Actual

Bonus

Raymond J. Quinlan

 150%$1,395,000$1,082,520$279,000$1,361,520

Steven J. McGarry

 150%$750,000$582,000$150,000$732,000

Paul F. Thome

 125%$562,500$436,500$118,125$554,625

Donna F. Vieira

 125%$562,500$436,500$118,125$554,625

Nicolas Jafarieh

 100%$425,000$329,800$89,250$419,050

(1)

For the NEOs, the corporate and individual performance components of their bonus targets were 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    37


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

2019 NEO Long-Term Incentive Program

In connection with our 2019 NEO LTIP awards, the NGC Committee utilized a combination of (i) 50 percent RSUs vesting inone-third increments over each anniversary of the grant date, and (ii) 50 percent PSUs vesting in 2022 upon certification by the NGC Committee as to satisfaction of the two performance factors and TSR modifier as described in more detail below. Our 2019 LTIP grants are intended to provide long-term incentive and performance-based compensation to our NEOs in order to retain and attract highly qualified executives and tie their performance to the performance of our Company, thus aligning their interests with the interests of our stockholders.

2019 PSUs for NEO Long-Term Incentive Awards

•  For the NEOs except for Ms. Vieira, we granted PSUs that:

•  vest between 0 percent to 187.5 percent in 2021 based on (i) the level of cumulative charge-offs from 2019-2021 of the cohort of Private Education Loans first entering full principal and interest repayment status during the fourth quarter of 2018, (ii)pre-tax,pre-provision income at the end of 2021, and (iii) TSR from 2019-2021;

•  are equally weighted at 50 percent for each of the cumulative charge-offs goal andpre-tax,pre-provision income goal;

•  are adjusted upward or downward by as much as 25 percent in either direction based on the TSR modifier; and

•  vest upon the NGC Committee’s determination of actual performance relative topre-established targets.

•  Ms. Vieira commenced her employment with the Company as an executive officer on January 14, 2019, and accordingly did not receive a PSU award in January 2019. Pursuant to her offer letter, Ms. Vieira received asign-on equity award in January 2019 consisting of 100 percent RSUs that vest inone-third increments over a three-year period.

Cumulative Charge-offs

We believe that emphasis on maintaining the credit quality of our Private Education Loans over the next three years is of critical importance to the Company. To measure our success, we selected cumulative charge-offs of our cohort$3.34 billion of Private Education Loans first entering full principal and interest repayment status during the fourth quarter of 2018 as the relevant PSU credit quality metric.Cumulative charge-offs are a critical focus ofin 2022 resulting in the Company recognizing a gain of $328 million in 2022, and are, therefore, a measure used in our awards(ii) the repurchase of PSUs. Accordingly, we believe that linking our equity grants to cumulative charge-offs creates an appropriate way to measure and reward performance and drive profitable growth.

Pre-Tax,Pre-Provision Income

We believe thatpre-tax,pre-provision income is an important measure40 million shares of the Company’s currentCommon Stock in 2022;

•  Executed the asset-backed securities program in 2022 with appropriate levels of continuity, support, transparency, and future financial success. This metric measures the health of the business and reflects our ability to increase loan originations and effectively fund our loans. In addition, this metric evaluates our discipline in controlling expenses to supportinvestor outreach;

•  Expanded the Company’s loan growth.Pre-tax,pre-provision income is calculated by adding netNet Interest Margin 10 percent from the year-ago period to 5.31 percent in a challenging interest income andnon-interest income (excluding the impact from indemnified tax positions and gains/losses on derivatives and hedging activities, net) less totalnon-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2021.Pre-tax,pre-provision income is an important metric for the Company as it correlates net interest income and operating expenses, two important metrics in determining our success, and is therefore a measure used in our awards of PSUs. Accordingly, we believe that linking our equity grants topre-tax,pre-provision income creates an appropriate additional way to measure and reward long-term performance and drive profitable growth.rate environment;

TSR

We believe TSR used as a modifier is important because it correlates directly with•  Oversaw the Company’s stock price performance, which further alignsappropriately managed (i) liquidity risk and strong liquidity stress testing program, (ii) capital risk and solid capital stress testing program, and (iii) market, interest rate, and model risk; and

•  Supported the interestsCompany’s focus on overseeing a diligent budgeting process.

Kerri A. Palmer,

Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer and President of our management with those of our stockholders. Our TSR will be evaluated as compared to a defined set of comparable companiesSallie Mae Bank

(Ms. Palmer’s achievements were based on size, volatility, stock price correlation, and industry.

We annually reviewher service as the metrics (and related target levels) used in our long-term incentive programs to ensure they remain aligned with our strategic plan and the interest of our stockholders. The PSU goals are derived from a rigorous process that involved input and discussions among the NGC Committee, our former CEO, the Chief Financial Officer, internal human resources, finance personnel, the NGC’s independent compensation consultant, and legal advisors.

38    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

The table below sets forth the value of LTIP awards granted in January 2019:

   

Named Executive Officer

2019 LTIP

RSUs

($)

2019 LTIP

PSUs(1)

($)

2019 LTIP

Total

($)

Raymond J. Quinlan

$1,750,000$1,750,000$3,500,000

Steven J. McGarry

$325,000$325,000$650,000

Paul F. Thome

$275,000$275,000$550,000

Donna F. Vieira(2)

   

Nicolas Jafarieh

$225,000$225,000$450,000

(1)

PSUs granted in 2019 to NEOs are disclosed in this column at the target level. PSUs will vest between 0 percent to 187.5 percent in 2021 based on (i) the level of cumulative charge-offs from 2019-2021 of the cohort of Private Education Loans first entering full principal and interest repayment status during the fourth quarter of 2018, (ii)pre-tax,pre-provision income at the end of 2021, and (iii) TSR from 2019-2021.

(2)

Ms. Vieira commenced her employment with the Company as an executive officer on January 14, 2019 and accordingly did not receive an RSU or PSU award pursuant to the 2019 LTIP in January 2019. However, pursuant to her offer letter, Ms. Vieira received asign-on equity award in January 2019 consisting of 100 percent RSUs that vest inone-third increments over a three-year period.

NEO Achievements

Material factors considered in the Committee’s assessment of individual performance for 2019 include:

NEO

ACHIEVEMENTS

Raymond J. Quinlan,

Chairman and

Former Chief Executive Officer

Under Mr. Quinlan’s leadership, the Company achieved the following:

•  Prudently managed the Company’s 2019 growth:

•  Full-Year 2019 GAAP Net Income Attributable to Common Stock of $561 million or $1.30 Per Diluted Share (which is an Increase of 21 percent as compared toyear-ago period on a Per Diluted Share basis);

•  Private Education Loan portfolio totaled $22.9 billion at end of 2019;

•  Private Education Loan originations were 6 percent higher in 2019 compared with 2018; and

•  Realized a 20.7 percent Return on Common Equity for 2019.

•  Completed two secured financings totaling $1.1 billion;

•  Maintained our strong capital position that significantly exceeds those ratios necessary to be considered “well capitalized” by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

•  Recognized by J.D. Power by providing “An Outstanding Customer Service Experience” for phone support;

•  Maintained a strong governance framework, which includes robust oversight, education, policies and procedures supported by enterprise risk management, compliance, and internal audit functions;

•  Led engaging quarterly townhall meetings and monthly employee interactions that fostered open discussions and valuable feedback from various employees in different departments of the Company;

•  Leveraged our culture to engage employees, recognize and reward contributions to business results, and develop talent to support the Company’s business strategy and growth; and

•  Collaborated with the Board of Directors, including the NGC Committee, with respect to succession planning.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    39


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

NEO

ACHIEVEMENTS

Steven J. McGarry,

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

•  Effectively executed the funding of the Bank subsidiary using deposits and Private Education Loan Asset-Backed Securities transactions to support our loan originations;

•  Led the Treasury and Capital Market functions contributing to the Company’s Net Interest Margin of 5.76 percent in 2019, while navigating a falling interest rate environment;

•  Expanded the Company’s deposit base, specifically increasing its retail and other deposits by $1.6 billion from 2018 to 2019;

•  Managed the Company’s liquidity and capital management, further creating shareholder value and providing a strong foundation for the Company in 2020;

•  Established abest-in-class liquidity stress test program;

•  Led the Company’s efforts in declaring a quarterly common stock dividend of $0.03 per share as well as establishing a $200 million share repurchase program in 2019;

•  Maintained strong operational internal controls and governance processes over the Finance and Financial Reporting functions;

•  Managed the Company’s operating expenses against the target operating efficiency goal in the Company’s 2019 MIP; and

•  Collaborated with our former CEO on developing the Company’s capital return strategy that monetized the value of the portfolio to create stockholder value.

Paul F. Thome,

Executive Vice President

and Chief Administrative

Officer

•  Served as the President of the Bank subsidiary as: (i) the Bank maintained collaborative relationships with its banking regulators and exceeded all regulatory capital requirements for well-capitalized banks; (ii) the Bank completed its fourth capital stress test; (iii) the Bank achieved an outstanding CRA rating; and (iv) customer complaint volume declined while loan and deposit account growth increased compared to the prior year;

•  Served as Chair of the Operational Risk Committee in an efficient and effective manner by overseeing: (i) the assessment of all aspects of operational risk associated with new products, services and processes; (ii) third-party due diligence and contracts; (iii) operational process design and execution of implementation plans; and (iv) approval of operational policies and procedures;

•  Oversaw the growth of retail deposits by over 29 percent and the successful conversion of the Bank’s retail deposit platform to a digital core processor;

•  Areas of direct responsibility (Retail Banking, Office of the Customer Advocate, Vendor Management, Procurement, and Facilities) operated in a strong risk and compliance framework; and

•  Assisted the Company’s product development initiatives in performing and evaluating potential new products, partnerships, and investments.

40    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

NEO

ACHIEVEMENTS

Donna F. Vieira,

Executive Vice President and

Chief Marketing Officer

•  Achieved Private Education Loan Originations of $5.6 billion in 2019 while maintaining credit quality;

•  Launched new credit card program to increase the level of engagement with existing customers and attract new customers;

•  Defined the Company’s digital transformation strategy with a mobile-first approach;

•  Mapped out the journey to simplify the Company’s core customer experience beginning with the student loan application;

•  Led the launch of the Company’s new brand initiative, and defined the path going forward for amplifying the Company’s brand experience around empowering financial independence;

•  Commenced the process for strengthening the Company’s marketing environment; and

•  Conducted and released high-visibility, mission-aligned research positioning Sallie Mae as an industry leader.

Nicolas Jafarieh,

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

•  Successfully led the legal function, providing timely and actionable advice and guidance to support the Company’s growth initiatives, demonstrating sound judgment, strategic leadership, and thoughtful and balanced management of legal risk;

•  Provided both strategic input and execution oversight on new and developing corporate initiatives, including our capital return programs (dividends, share repurchases, loan sales), growth opportunities in our core education loan products, the launch of our credit card products, and enhancements to our credit management policies;

•  Effectively led the legal team’s execution of major initiatives in all areas of responsibility such as: (i) public company disclosures; (ii) securitizations and financial transactions; (iii) key vendor relationships, commercial contracts and investments; (iv) mitigation of legal risk in the areas of tax, regulatory compliance, litigation, and employment law; (v) incentive compensation and employee benefits; and (vi) compliance with consumer protection laws and regulations, among others;

•  Served as a key advisor to the Board of Directors and the executive management team on corporate governance matters, shareholder outreach, and disclosure; and oversaw the Corporate Secretary function for the Company and its subsidiaries;

•  Continued to develop the legal team through opportunities for professional growth as well as strategic hires, and implemented enhancements to legal operations, governance processes, and risk controls;

•  Led the discussion and communication of the Company’s ESG initiatives and the production of the Company’s inaugural Corporate Social Responsibility Report;

•  Served in a significant role as part of our senior leadership team and beyond the legal function in our employee engagement and management development programs, the revamp of our brand and our core values, our innovation lab, and by providing strategic input on our incentive compensation and employee benefits programs; and

•  Assumed responsibility in 2019 for the governance and operations of the Sallie Mae Fund, the Company’s 501(c)(3) charitable giving arm, continuing to enhance governance, risk controls, and alignment with the Company’s mission and our employees’ commitment to serving the communities in which they and their families live and work.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    41


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

The following table summarizes performance year 2019 compensation for the NEOs as approved by the NGC Committee:

 

Name

 

Base Salary

 

Management Incentive Plan

 

Long Term Incentive Plan

Raymond J. Quinlan(1)

$930,000$1,361,520$3,500,000

Steven J. McGarry

$500,000$732,000$650,000

Paul F. Thome(2)

$450,000$554,625$550,000

Donna F. Vieira(3)

$450,000$554,625$450,000(4) 

Nicolas Jafarieh

$425,000$419,050$450,000

(1)

Mr. Quinlan received a base salary increase of $80,000 (approximately 9.4 percent) from $850,000 in 2018 to $930,000 in 2019 based on his strong performance and in consideration of peer group market data.

(2)

Mr. Thome received a base salary increase of $50,000 (approximately 12.5 percent) from $400,000 in 2018 to $450,000 in 2019 based on his strong performance and consideration of peer group market data.

(3)

Ms. Vieira also received aone-time cashsign-on bonus of $550,000 pursuant to her commencement of employment with the Company as Chief Marketing Officer in January 2019.

(4)

This dollar value solely includes Ms. Vieira’sone-time RSU grant in January 2019 in connection with her commencement of employment with the Company as Chief Marketing Officer.

Vesting of the 2017 PSU Grants

In 2017, 20 percent of the LTIP award granted to Messrs. Quinlan, McGarry, and Thome consisted of PSUs that vested in January 2020 at 150 percent of target based on cumulative charge-offs of 3.50 percent from 2017-2019 of the cohort of Private Education Loans first entering full principal and interest repayment status during the fourth quarter of 2016 as detailed in the table below:

Cumulative Charge-offs Performance Chart for 2017 PSU Grant

Based on Performance Period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019:

Cumulative Charge-offs

 

Percentage of Award —    

PSU Payout

 

£4.0%

150%
 

4.5%

125%
 

5.0%

100%
 

5.5%

  75%
 

6.0%

  50%
 

6.5%

  25%
 

>6.5%

    0%

Pursuant to the terms of the 2017 PSU awards, in January 2020, the NGC Committee approved and certified the actual performance of the cumulative charge-offs performance goal for the performance period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019 relative topre-established targets.

Accordingly, because the cumulative charge-offs for the relevant cohort were 3.50 percent, in January 2020, Messrs. Quinlan, McGarry, and Thome received the following number of shares of common stock pursuant to the vesting of their 2017 PSU grants:

Name

 

 

Target Number of
Shares of Common Stock
Pursuant to the 2017 PSU Award

 

 

Actual Shares Number of
Shares of Common Stock
Pursuant to the 2017 PSU Award(1)

 

  

Raymond J. Quinlan

57,25186,961
  

Steven J. McGarry

10,17815,459
  

Paul F. Thome

  7,633

11,594

(1)

Includes Dividend Equivalent Units.

Mr. Jafarieh and Ms. Vieira did not receive PSUs in 2017, and thus did not have any PSU grants that vested in January 2020.

42    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Risk Assessment of Compensation Plans

The Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) coordinatesduring the risk assessment2022 performance year)

•  Led the significant progress and oversight of Sallie Mae’s incentive compensation plans with a cross-functional team of Sallie Mae’s senior officers from the human resources, internal audit, compliance,fundamental development and legal departments. The CRO’s responsibilities include: oversightbuild out of the annualindependent risk review and assessment of our incentive compensation plans to ensure our employees are not incented to take inappropriate risks that could impact our financial position and controls, reputation, and operations; and to develop policies and procedures to ensure our incentive compensation plans are designed to achieve their business goals within acceptable risk parameters. The CRO periodically reports to the NGC Committee on the controls and reviews of our incentive compensation plans.

The CRO presented his conclusions to the NGC Committee, and the NGC Committee agreed, that with respect to our 2019 MIP and LTIP, the risks embedded in those plans were within our ability to effectively monitor and manage, properly balanced risk and reward, and were not likely to promote excessive risk-taking.

Compensation Consultant

The NGC Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to advise on relevant market practices and specific compensation programs. A representativemanagement function of the compensation consultant attended meetings of the NGC Committee, as requested, and communicated with the Chair of the NGC Committee. Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. has served as our compensation consultant (the “Compensation Consultant”) since May 2015. Since its appointment, some of the services the Compensation Consultant has provided have included:

Assisting in developing a peer group of companies for benchmarking director and executive compensation;

Providing market-relevant information as to the composition of director and executive compensation;

Providing views on the reasonableness of amounts and forms of director and executive compensation;

Assisting the NGC Committee with incentive plan design decisions;

Providing guidance on regulatory changes; and

Reviewing drafts and commenting on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related compensation tables for the proxy statement.

From time to time, but no less than annually, the NGC Committee considers the independence of the Compensation Consultant in light of SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards. At this time, the NGC Committee has concluded there is no conflict of interest with regard to the Compensation Consultant.

Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of the NGC Committee are independent directors, and no current member is or has been an employee of Sallie Mae. During 2019, none of our executive officers served on a compensation committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity whose executive officer served on the NGC Committee.

Peer Group Analysis

The NGC Committee works with the Compensation Consultant to select a financial services peer group for purposes of identifying and considering comparative compensation data in determining the compensation of our CEO and other NEOs. The peer group, which is periodically reviewed and updated by the NGC Committee, consists of companies selected by the NGC Committee that are similar in size (revenue and market capitalization) and in the same industry as the Company and with whom the Company may compete for executive talent. The following changes were made to the peer group in 2019: (i) the removal of MB Financial due to the completion of its acquisition by FifthCompany;

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    43


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Third Bancorp and (ii) the addition of BankUnited, Synovus Financial Corp., and Valley National Bancorp as the respective companies are commonly included as peers among the current members of our peer group. The peer group utilized for purposes of setting NEO compensation components is as follows:

Peer Group

Bank OZK

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.

BankUnited

Signature Bank

Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

SVB Financial Group

First Republic Bank/CA

Synovus Financial Corp.

F.N.B. Corporation

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

Hancock Holding Company

Valley National Bancorp

IberiaBank Corporation

Webster Financial Corp.

PacWest Bancorp

Western Alliance Bancorporation

The NGC Committee believes it is appropriate to continuously monitor relative compensation amounts with respect to the same peer group used by management and the Board of Directors for financial performance comparisons.

Other Arrangements, Policies and Practices Related to Executive Compensation Programs

Share Ownership Guidelines

As of December 31, 2019, the guidelines for beneficial ownership of our Common Stock, which are expected to be achieved over a five-year period from date of hire or appointment, were as follows:

CEO (formerly Mr. Quinlan)—lesser of 1 million shares or $5 million in value;

Executive Vice President (Mr. McGarry, Mr. Thome, and Ms. Vieira)—lesser of 200,000 shares or $1 million in value; and

Senior Vice President (Mr. Jafarieh)lesser of 70,000 shares or $350,000 in value.

The guidelines encourage continued beneficial ownership of a significant amount of our Common Stock acquired through equity awards and help align the interests of senior executives with the interests of our stockholders. Executives generally must hold all Common Stock acquired through equity grants until the applicable thresholds are met, and an•  Enabled executive will not be eligible to receive further equity grants for the year if he or she sells the stock and such sale would result in a decrease below the established thresholds.

All current NEOs were in compliance with the share ownership guidelines as of December 31, 2019 or are expected to achieve compliance within the applicable five-year period.

Hedging and Pledging Prohibition

Pursuant to the Company’s Stock Trading Window Policy, we prohibit directors, executive officers, and senior management from selling Common Stock short, buying or selling call or put options or other derivatives, or entering into other transactions that have the effect of hedging the economic value of any of their beneficial ownership of our shares.

Pursuant to the Company’s Stock Trading Window Policy, we also prohibit directors, executive officers, and senior management from purchasing Common Stock on margin or otherwise pledging Common Stock as collateral for a loan.

We prohibit hedging and pledging by our directors, executive officers, and senior management because they have the greatest ability to influence the direction of the Company and have a proportionally higher equity ownership than other employees generally. Accordingly, we expect our directors, executive officers,leadership and senior management to bear the risks and rewards of stock ownership. We believe that prohibiting hedging and pledging of Company securities by our directors, executive officers, and senior management is an important governance matter because it promotes alignment with our stockholders.

Clawback

Equity and cash bonus awards made to executives, including our NEOs, under the 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) currently contain clawback provisions in the event of a material misstatement of our financial results and certain other events.

44    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSIONAND ANALYSIS

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16 of the Exchange Act requires Sallie Mae’s executive officers and directors, as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of the Common Stock, to file reports on their holdings of and transactions in our Common Stock. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms in our possession and on written representations fromdrive accountability through effective risk reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year 2019 all required reports were filed in a timely manner.

Tax Information: Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deductibility of compensation for certain executive officers that is more than $1 million. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts of 2017, Section 162(m) provided an exemption from this deduction limitation for compensation that qualified as “performance-based compensation.” However, among other changes to Section 162(m), the exemption for performance-based compensation was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, subject to transition relief for certain arrangements in place as of November 2, 2017.

The NGC Committee continues to have the flexibility to paynon-deductible compensation if it believes it is in the best interests of the Company.

Nominations, Governance and Compensation Committee—Delegation of Authority

Pursuant to the NGC Committee Charter and to the extent permitted by applicable law, rules or regulations, the NGC Committee may form and delegate all or a portion of its authority to subcommittees comprised of one or more members of the NGC Committee or to members of the Company’s management. Each subcommittee has the full power and authority of the NGC Committee as it relates to matters delegated to the subcommittee.

In addition, pursuant to the 2012 Plan, the NGC Committee has delegated limited authority to a subcommittee consisting of our Chairman and CEO and the Chair of the NGC Committee to approve bonuses, including RSUs, paid under the 2019 MIP tonon-NEO employees. The NGC Committee has also delegated limited authority to our Chairman and CEO to make grants to new hires who are not subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. Neither subcommittee is permitted to grant awards to our NEOs or persons subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    45


NOMINATIONS, GOVERNANCEAND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

NOMINATIONS, GOVERNANCE AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The components of our compensation program are in place to promote prudent management decision-making and to profitably drive the evolution of our consumer banking business, all while ensuring we motivate, reward, and retain employees. Accordingly, we have reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors by strengthening reporting processes and procedures and content quality; and

•  Led efforts to successfully rebuild numerous major policies, procedures, processes, and committees while still demonstrating sustainability; and

•  Demonstrated significant action to strengthen and upgrade the talent of the risk management function of the Company.

Daniel P. Kennedy,

Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer and President of Sallie Mae Bank

•  Oversaw the execution of the Operations function meeting its inclusion herein2022 goal measures, including total cost to service expense and its incorporationcost to service unit cost; and

•  Established a successful culture working group within the Operations function to identify opportunities across all lines of the business.

44        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

LOGO

NEO

ACHIEVEMENTS

Donna F. Vieira,

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

•  Led the Company’s origination of approximately $6.0 billion of Private Education Loans in 2022, 10 percent higher than the prior year and the highest over the previous 5-year period, while gaining market share and increasing underclassmen originations, which typically have a higher lifetime value to the Company, by reference15 percent from the prior year;

•  Oversaw the successful integration of the Nitro College acquisition by (i) enhancing future strategic growth opportunities for the Company, (ii) expanding the Company’s digital marketing capabilities, (iii) reducing the cost to acquire customer accounts, and (iv) accelerating the Company’s progress to become a broader education solutions provider helping students to, through, and immediately after college; and

•  Improved tools and resources to assist students along their higher education journey that have resulted in increased engagement, positive sentiment, and correlated customer experience improvements.

The following table summarizes performance-year 2022 compensation for the NEOs as approved by the Compensation Committee:

LOGO

Name

  Base Salary  Annual Incentive Plan  Long Term Incentive Plan*   

Jonathan W. Witter

   $1,100,000   $1,320,000   $5,000,000

Steven J. McGarry

   $515,000   $733,875   $900,000

Kerri A. Palmer

   $566,500   $920,563   $700,000

Daniel P. Kennedy

   $489,250   $489,250   $900,000

Donna F. Vieira

   $489,250   $672,719   $850,000

*

The total LTIP dollar values as shown in this table differ from the values shown in the Company’s Annual ReportSummary Compensation Table on Form10-K forpage 52 and the year ending December 31, 2019.2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table on page 54 due to differences in the accounting valuation of the LTIP awards on the grant date.

Vesting of the 2020 PSU Grants

In 2020, 50 percent of the 2020 LTIP award granted to Mr. McGarry and Ms. Vieira in January 2020, as well as the PSU award granted to Mr. Witter in April 2020 in connection with the commencement of his employment as the Company’s CEO, consisted of PSUs that vested in February 2023 at 153.125 percent of target based on (i) cumulative charge-offs of 4.3 percent from 2020 — 2022 of the cohort of Private Education Loans first entering full principal and interest repayment status during the fourth quarter of 2019 as detailed in the table below (145 percent of the metric’s target); (ii) pre-tax, pre-provision income of $1,269,413,559 as detailed in the table below (100 percent of the metric’s target); and (iii) a relative TSR modifier in the 100th percentile as detailed in the table below (125 percent of modifier to PSU award) The tables below show the threshold, target and maximum payout percentages associated with each of the PSU performance metrics from the 2020 PSU grants:

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        45


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Cumulative Charge-offs Performance Chart (50% weight) for 2020 PSU Grant

Based on Performance Period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022

LOGO

Cumulative Charge-offs

  

Percentage of Target Award —   

PSU Payout (50% weight)   

4.2%

    150%

4.7%

    125%

5.2%

    100%

5.7%

    75%

6.2%

    50%

6.7%

    25%

>6.7%

    0%

Pre-tax, Pre-provision Income December 31, 2022 Performance Chart (50% weight)

LOGO

Pre-tax, pre-provision December 31, 2022 Income

 

 

  

Percentage of Target Award –   

PSU Payout (50% WEIGHT)   

>$1,492,000,000

    150%

$1,492,000,000

    150%

$1,119,000,000 to $1,367,000,000

    100%

$994,000,000

    50%

<$994,000,000

    0%

TSR Modifier based on the performance period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022

LOGO

TSR of the Corporation relative to TSR of the Peer Group

Percentage of Modifier to   

Nominations, Governance and Compensation CommitteeFinal Award of PSUs   

William N. Shiebler,25%

-25%

>75%

+25%

Pursuant to the terms of the 2020 PSU awards, in February 2023, the Compensation Committee approved and certified the actual performance of (i) the cumulative charge-offs performance goal for the performance period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022 relative to pre-established targets; (ii) the pre-tax, pre-provision income performance goal as of December 31, 2022 relative to pre-established targets; and (iii) the TSR modifier based on the performance period from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022.

46        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Accordingly, because the 2020 PSUs vested at 153.125 percent of target, in February 2023, Mr. Witter, Mr. McGarry, and Ms. Vieira received the following number of shares of Common Stock pursuant to the vesting of their 2020 PSU grants:

LOGO

Name

  Target Number of
Shares of Common Stock
Pursuant to the 2020 PSU Award
   Actual Shares Number of
Shares of Common Stock
Pursuant to the 2020 PSU Award(1)
 

Jonathan W. Witter

   249,412    381,913 

Steven J. McGarry

   31,080    47,592 

Donna Vieira

   26,299    40,270 

(1)

Includes Dividend Equivalent Units.

Ms. Palmer and Mr. Kennedy did not receive PSUs in 2020, and thus did not have any PSU grants that vested in February 2023.

Risk Assessments and Attestations of Compensation Plans

The Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) coordinates forward-looking risk assessments, backward-looking attestations, quarterly risk reviews of performance against incentive compensation plans, and ongoing oversight of Sallie Mae’s incentive compensation plans with a cross-functional team of Sallie Mae’s senior officers from the risk, human resources, internal audit, compliance, and legal departments. The CRO’s responsibilities include: oversight of the annual forward-looking risk assessments and backward-looking attestations of our incentive compensation plans to help ensure our employees are not incentivized to take inappropriate risks that could impact our financial position and controls, reputation, and operations; and developing policies and procedures to help ensure our incentive compensation plans are designed to achieve their business goals within acceptable risk parameters. The CRO periodically reports to the Compensation Committee on the results of the quarterly risk reviews of performance against our incentive compensation plans.

As part of the annual forward-looking risk assessment in 2022, the CRO presented conclusions to the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee agreed, that with respect to our 2022 AIP and LTIP, the risks embedded in those plans were within our ability to effectively monitor and manage, properly balance risk and reward, and were not likely to promote excessive risk-taking. In addition, as part of the annual backward-looking attestation of incentive compensation plans, in the first quarter of 2023, the CRO presented a review and conclusions to the Compensation Committee that confirmed our incentive compensation plans, including the 2022 AIP and LTIP, are sufficiently risk sensitive, do not encourage excessive risk-taking, and are consistent with the safety and soundness of Sallie Mae and are otherwise consistent with applicable law and the applicable regulatory rules and guidance.

Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to advise on relevant market practices and specific compensation programs. A representative of the compensation consultant attended meetings of the Compensation Committee, as requested, and communicated with the Chair of the Compensation Committee. Aon’s Human Capital Solutions practice, a division of Aon PLC (otherwise known as McLagan), serves as the Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant. The compensation consultants have provided the following services, among other things:

assisting in developing a peer group of companies for benchmarking director and executive compensation;

providing market-relevant information as to the composition of director and executive compensation;

providing views on the reasonableness of amounts and forms of director and executive compensation;

assisting the Compensation Committee with incentive plan design decisions;

providing guidance on regulatory changes; and

reviewing drafts and commenting on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related compensation tables for the proxy statement.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        47


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

From time to time, but no less than annually, the Compensation Committee considers the independence of the Compensation Consultant in light of SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards. At this time, the Compensation Committee has concluded there is no conflict of interest with regard to the compensation consultant.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors, and no current member is or has been an employee of Sallie Mae. During 2022, none of our executive officers served on a compensation committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity whose executive officer served on the Compensation Committee.

Peer Group Analysis

Recognizing that the Company has a limited number of direct peer companies, the Compensation Committee works with the compensation consultant to select a peer group for purposes of considering market compensation data in determining the compensation of our CEO and other NEOs. The peer group, which is periodically reviewed and updated by the Compensation Committee, consists of companies that are similar in size (revenue and market capitalization) and in generally similar industries as the Company and with whom the Company may compete for executive talent. The following change was made to the peer group in 2022: adding SoFi Technologies, Inc., a consumer-oriented fintech / specialty lender whose pay philosophy, quantum, and mix can serve as an appropriate comparator.

The peer group utilized for purposes of setting NEO compensation components is as follows:

LOGO

Peer Group (Ticker)

Ally Financial Inc.(ALLY)

LendingClub Corp. (LC)

Axos Financial Inc. (AX)

LendingTree Inc.(TREE)

BankUnited Inc. (BKU)

OneMain Holdings Inc. (OMF)

Commerce Bancshares Inc.(CBSH)

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB)

Credit Acceptance Corp.(CACC)

SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI)

Enova International Inc.(ENVA)

Synovus Financial Corp. (SNV)

F.N.B. Corp. (FNB)

Upstart Holdings Inc. (UPST)

The Compensation Committee believes it is appropriate to continuously monitor relative compensation amounts with respect to the same peer group used by management and the Board of Directors for financial performance comparisons.

Other Arrangements, Policies, and Practices Related to Executive Compensation Programs

Share Ownership Guidelines

As of December 31, 2022, the guidelines for beneficial ownership of our Common Stock were as follows:

CEO (Mr. Witter)—six times the CEO’s annual base salary;

Executive Vice President (including Mr. McGarry, Ms. Palmer, Mr. Kennedy, and Ms. Vieira)—three times the Executive Vice President’s annual base salary; and

Senior Vice President1.5 times the Senior Vice President’s annual base salary.

The guidelines do not provide a time limit to achieve such minimum beneficial ownership of our Common Stock. However, until the guidelines are met, executives may only sell up to 25 percent of such individual’s net shares.

The guidelines encourage continued beneficial ownership of a significant amount of our Common Stock acquired through equity awards and help align the interests of senior executives with the interests of our stockholders. After

48        SLM CORPORATION


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

achieving the guidelines, executives will not be eligible to receive further equity grants if he or she sells stock and such sale would result in a decrease below the established thresholds.

All current NEOs were in compliance with the share ownership guidelines as of December 31, 2022.

Compensation Committee—Delegation of Authority

Pursuant to the Compensation Committee Charter and to the extent permitted by applicable law, rules, or regulations, the Compensation Committee may form and delegate all or a portion of its authority to subcommittees composed of one or more members of the Compensation Committee or to members of the Company’s management. Each subcommittee has the full power and authority of the Compensation Committee as it relates to matters delegated to the subcommittee. For more information regarding the Compensation Committee-Delegation of Authority relating to grants of equity, please see the section below titled “Equity Grant Policies and Practices”.

Equity Grant Policies and Practices

We generally grant equity compensation to eligible employees on an annual basis. Our Human Resources team reviews the annual LTIP program provisions and grant levels in the beginning of the first quarter of the year to coincide with the annual performance management compensation review process established by the Company for all employees. As a part of that process each year, the Human Resources team will pre-establish a grant date at the end of the performance year for grants during an open trading window to eligible employees, subject to the business considerations of the Company, as approved by the Compensation Committee. Consistent with our current practice, in 2022 the annual equity grants to all eligible employees were awarded on February 18, 2022, during an open trading window and following the Compensation Committee meeting approving such annual equity grants.

The Compensation Committee approves all grants of equity compensation to be awarded to executive officers (other than the CEO). In addition, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors for approval all proposed grants of equity compensation to be awarded to the CEO and directors. In 2022, pursuant to the 2021 Plan, the Compensation Committee delegated limited authority to a subcommittee consisting of the CEO and Chair of the Compensation Committee to approve the annual equity grants under the LTIP to non-executive employees within the limits and budgets established as part of the annual grant program guidelines.

From time to time, the Company may find it necessary to issue equity awards to non-executive employees outside of the normal annual grant process. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has delegated limited authority to the CEO (who is a director) to make grants to new hires as well as promotional and/or special one-time grants to employees who are not subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act. Such authority is limited to a certain number of shares as determined by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of each year. For these grants, our procedures provide that such grants be made at the end of each quarter, as applicable. Any grants made by the CEO pursuant to this delegation of authority are reported to the Compensation Committee on a quarterly basis. Based on this information, the Compensation Committee determines whether the grant of such delegation of authority was appropriate and whether additional authority should be granted to the CEO. Pursuant to this delegated limited authority, the CEO is not permitted to make grants to our NEOs or persons subject to Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

Hedging and Pledging Prohibition

Pursuant to the Company’s Stock Trading Window Policy, we prohibit directors, executive officers, and senior management from selling Common Stock short, buying or selling call or put options or other derivatives, or entering into other transactions that have the effect of hedging the economic value of any of their beneficial ownership of our shares.

Pursuant to the Company’s Stock Trading Window Policy, we also prohibit directors, executive officers, and senior management from purchasing Common Stock on margin or otherwise pledging Common Stock as collateral for a loan.

We prohibit hedging and pledging by our directors, executive officers, and senior management because they have the greatest ability to influence the direction of the Company and have a proportionally higher equity ownership than other employees generally. Accordingly, we expect our directors, executive officers, and senior management to bear the risks and rewards of stock ownership. We believe that prohibiting hedging and pledging of Company securities by our directors, executive officers, and senior management is an important governance matter because it promotes alignment with our stockholders.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        49


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Clawback

Equity and cash bonus awards made to executives, including our NEOs, under the SLM Corporation 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) as well as the SLM Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Predecessor Plan”) contain clawback provisions in the event of a material misstatement of our financial results and certain other events. In addition, we maintain an Incentive Compensation Adjustment Policy outlining the Compensation Committee’s authority and responsibilities to review and potentially adjust employee incentive compensation and severance payments or benefits paid under our severance plans (as described below), including reducing, eliminating, and/or clawing back incentive compensation or severance. The Compensation Committee is reviewing the final rule adopted by the SEC that implements the applicable provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to recoupment of incentive-based compensation, and the Company will amend its clawback policy when the NASDAQ adopts final listing standards in accordance with the final rule.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16 of the Exchange Act requires Sallie Mae’s executive officers and directors, as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of the Common Stock, to file reports on their holdings of and transactions in our Common Stock. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms in our possession and on written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during the fiscal year 2022 all required reports were filed in a timely manner.

Tax Information: Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deductibility of compensation for certain executive officers that is more than $1 million. The Compensation Committee continues to have the flexibility to pay non-deductible compensation if it believes it is in the best interests of the Company.

50        SLM CORPORATION


Compensation Committee Report

The components of our compensation program are in place to promote prudent management decision-making and to profitably drive the evolution of our consumer banking business, all while ensuring we motivate, reward, and retain employees. Accordingly, we have reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on this review and discussion, we have recommended to the Board of Directors its inclusion herein and its incorporation by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2022.

Compensation Committee

Mark Lavelle, Chair

Mary Carter Warren Franke

Earl A. Goode

Mark L. Lavelle

Jim MathesonTed Manvitz

Kirsten O. Wolberg

 

46    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement2023 PROXY STATEMENT        51


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLESummary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes compensation paid or awarded to or earned by each of the NEOs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019,2022, December 31, 2018,2021, and December 31, 2017.2020.

 

         

Name and Principal Position

YearSalary
($)
Bonus
($)
(1)
Stock
Awards
($)
(2)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive  Plan
Compensation
($)
(3)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(4)
All Other
Compensation
($)
(8)
Total
($)

Raymond J. Quinlan(5)

Chairman and Former Chief
Executive Officer

 

2019

 

920,769

 

 

3,665,958

 

 

1,361,520

 

 

114,000

 

6,062,247

 

2018

 

817,308

 

 

3,909,131

 

 

1,347,452

 

 

113,750

 

6,187,641

 

2017

 

834,615

 

 

3,740,675

 

 

1,097,106

 

 

82,131

 

5,754,527

Steven J. McGarry

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

 

2019

 

500,000

 

 

680,817

 

 

732,000

 

 

43,450

 

1,956,267

 

2018

 

476,155

 

 

890,168

 

 

720,563

 

 

38,750

 

2,125,636

 

2017

 

450,771

 

 

788,899

 

 

566,740

 

 

40,558

 

1,846,968

Paul F. Thome

Executive Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer

 

2019

 

444,231

 

 

576,076

 

 

554,625

 

 

39,000

 

1,613,932

 

2018

 

384,616

 

 

721,325

 

 

514,001

 

 

38,750

 

1,658,692

 

2017

 

400,000

 

 

589,487

 

 

418,504

 

 

37,304

 

1,445,295

Donna F. Vieira(6)

Executive Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer

 

2019

 

415,385

 

550,000

 

449,995

 

 

554,625

 

 

152,065

 

2,122,070

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

Nicolas Jafarieh(7)

Senior Vice President and
General Counsel

 

2019

 

425,000

 

 

471,335

 

 

419,050

 

 

12,250

 

1,327,635

 

2018

 

377,058

 

 

536,086

 

 

408,319

 

 

61,225

 

1,382,688

 

    

LOGO

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(1)
  Option
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(4)
  All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total
($)
 

Jonathan W. Witter(6)

Chief Executive Officer

  2022   1,076,923      5,373,654      1,320,000      38,559   7,809,136 
  2021   950,000      2,223,345   2,000,000   1,809,750      63,967   7,047,062 
  2020   657,692      8,824,635      1,623,930         11,106,257 

Steven J. McGarry

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  2022   512,692      967,257      733,875      29,450   2,243,274 
  2021   500,000      500,241   449,997   900,000      29,450   2,379,688 
  2020   519,231      697,510      811,188      43,700   2,071,629 

Kerri A. Palmer(7)

Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer and President of Sallie Mae Bank

  2022   563,962      752,314      920,563      29,450   2,266,289 
  2021   516,154      389,074   349,997   800,000      4,450   2,059,675 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel P. Kennedy(8)
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer and President of Sallie Mae Bank

  2022   487,058      967,257      489,250      25,000   1,968,565 
  2021   472,116      389,074   349,997   700,000      27,177   1,938,364 
  2020   417,308      399,993      621,212      39,250   1,477,763 

Donna F. Vieira

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer

  2022   487,058      913,505      672,719      25,000   2,098,282 
  2021   472,116      389,074   349,997   655,000      25,000   1,891,187 
  2020   467,308      590,206      621,212      39,250   1,717,976 

 

(1)

Represents asign-on cash bonus provided to Ms. Vieira upon her commencement of employment in January 2019.

(2)

Consists of (i) the portions of the MIP awards that were deferred in the form of vested RSUs with respect to performance for 2018 and 2017 (for 2019, no portion of the MIP award was deferred in the form of vested RSUs); (ii) the PSUs granted to NEOs under the 2012 Plan in 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017; (iii)2020; (ii) the NEOs’ 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 long-term incentive awards of RSUs; (iv)(iii) in Mr. Jafarieh’sWitter’s case for 2018,2020, the RSUs granted pursuant to his appointment as General Counsel;make-whole sign-on equity grant upon his commencement of employment in April 2020; and (v)(iv) in Ms. Vieira’sPalmer’s case for 2019,2021, the RSUs and PSUs granted pursuant to her commencement of employment as Chief MarketingRisk and Compliance Officer. The vested RSU portions of the MIP awards for 2018 and 2017 performance carry transfer restrictions that lapse in equal increments over the next three years following the grant date. The amounts shown are the grant date fair values of the RSUs granted during 2018 and 2017 and the PSUs granted in 2019, 2018, and 2017 and in each case are computed in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. Additional details on accounting for stock-based compensation can be found in “Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 13—16—Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Arrangements” to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 20192022 Form10-K. The grant date value of the PSUs granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2022 assuming the maximum level of performance conditions will be achieved is $5,000,000 for Mr. Witter, $900,000 for Mr. McGarry, $700,000 for Ms. Palmer, $900,000 for Mr. Kennedy, and $850,000 for Ms. Vieira.

(2)

Represents premium priced stock options that were granted at a 15 percent premium over the closing Sallie Mae stock price on the date of the grant.

 

(3)

Represents the cash portions of the MIPAIP (formerly the Management Incentive Plan (the “MIP”)) awards paid to the NEOs with respect to performance in 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017.2020. For 2019,2022, 2021, and 2020, all AIP or MIP awards, as applicable, for the NEOs were paid 100 percent in cash. For 2018, all MIP awards for the NEOs were paid 75 percent in cash and 25 percent in vested RSUs. For 2017, all MIP awards for the NEOs except for Mr. Jafarieh were paid 75 percent in cash and 25 percent in vested RSUs. Mr. Jafarieh’s MIP award in 2017 was paid 100 percent in cash prior to his appointment as General Counsel. The grant date fair values of the RSU portions of the annual incentive awards that were granted in January of 2018 and 2017 are reflected in the Stock Awards column.

 

(4)

The Company terminated itstax-qualified pension plan andnon-qualified nonqualified supplemental pension plan in 2011. The Company does not pay any above-market earnings onnon-qualified nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

 

52        SLM CORPORATION


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(5)

As part of our succession planning process, Mr. Quinlan no longer serves as CEO, effective as of April 19, 2020, and will no longer serve as a director or as Chairman of the Board of Directors, effective as of June 18, 2020. The terms of his separation are set forth in his separation and release agreement.

(6)

Ms. Vieira commenced her employment with the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer in January 2019. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2017 or 2018.

(7)

Mr. Jafarieh was not an NEO in the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2017. Mr. Jafarieh was appointed General Counsel on March 1, 2018.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    47


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(8)

For 2019,2022, the components of “All Other Compensation” are as follows:

 

Name

Employer

Contributions to
Defined Contribution Plans
($)
(a)

Severance
($)
Relocation
Allowance
($)
(b)
Perquisites
($)
(c)
Executive
Physical
($)
Total
($)

Raymond J. Quinlan

 

39,000

 

 

 

75,000

 

 

114,000

Steven J. McGarry

 

39,000

 

 

 

 

4,450

 

43,450

Paul F. Thome

 

39,000

 

 

 

 

 

39,000

Donna F. Vieira

 

3,615

 

 

148,450

 

 

 

152,065

Nicolas Jafarieh

 

2,800

 

 

 

5,000

 

4,450

 

12,250

LOGO

Name

  

Employer

Contributions to
Defined Contribution Plans
($)(a)

   Relocation
($)
   

Executive
Physical

($)

   

Total

($)

 

Jonathan W. Witter

   25,000    12,078    1,481    38,559 

Steven J. McGarry

   25,000        4,450    29,450 

Kerri A. Palmer

   25,000        4,450    29,450 

Daniel P. Kennedy

   25,000            25,000 

Donna F. Vieira

   25,000            25,000 

 

 (a)

Amounts credited to the Company’stax-qualified andnon-qualified nonqualified defined contribution plans. The combination of both plans provides participants with an employer contribution of up to five percent of the sum of base salary plus annual performance bonus up to $780,000$805,000 of total eligible plan compensation. For information regarding amounts credited in respect ofnon-qualified nonqualified defined contribution plans, see“Non-Qualified “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2019—2022—Supplemental 401(k) Savings PlanPlan” on page 54.59.

 

(b)(6)

In connectionMr. Witter commenced his employment with the Company as Chief Executive Officer on April 20, 2020.

(7)

Ms. Vieira’s commencement ofPalmer commenced her employment with the Company as Executive Vice President and Chief MarketingRisk and Compliance Officer inon January 2019, she received $131,142 in relocation benefits, which included a payment of $35,021 in respect of the taxes that she incurred in connection with her relocation benefits.19, 2021. Accordingly, no information is displayed for 2020. On January 9, 2023, Ms. Palmer was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operational Officer.

 

(c)(8)

The Sallie Mae Fund, an affiliate of the Company, made charitable donations (i) at the request of Mr. Quinlan totaling $75,000, and (ii) at the request ofKennedy ceased service as Chief Operational Officer on January 9, 2023. Mr. Jafarieh totaling $5,000.Kennedy’s employment was terminated without cause on March 1, 2023.

 

48    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement2023 PROXY STATEMENT        53


2019 GRANTSOF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

2019 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table provides information regarding all plan-based awards attributable to 20192022 performance, including all annual performance bonuses under the 2019 MIP2022 AIP (which were determined and paid in early 2020)2023), and three-year, time-vesting RSU awards and PSUs vesting based on the satisfaction of two performance factors and a TSR modifier, granted January 28, 2019 with respect to the 20192022 LTIP awards.awards granted on February 18, 2022: (i) three-year, annual time-vesting RSU awards; and (ii) three-year PSUs that cliff vest based on relative TSR, with a one-year holding period following the vesting date;. The awards listed in this table were granted under the 20122021 Plan and are described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

Name

 Award Type(1)  

Grant

Date

 

Date of

Board

or NGC

Committee

Action

 

Estimated Future

Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

  Estimated Future
Payouts under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
  

All

Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Secur-
ities
Under-
lying
Options
(#)

 

Exercise
or

Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/
Share)

 Grant Date
Fair Value
of  Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)(2)
 
 

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

 

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

 

Raymond J. Quinlan

  2019 LTIP RSU  01/28/19 01/16/19                161,141     1,749,991 
  2019 LTIP PSU  01/28/19 01/16/19          161,141   241,711        1,749,991 
  2019 MIP(³)  02/26/19 02/26/19   1,395,000   2,485,890                

Steven J. McGarry

  2019 LTIP RSU  01/28/19 01/14/19                29,926     324,996 
  2019 LTIP PSU  01/28/19 01/14/19          29,926   44,889      324,996 
  2019 MIP(³)  02/26/19 02/26/19   750,000   1,336,500                

Paul F. Thome

  2019 LTIP RSU  01/28/19 01/14/19                25,322     274,997 
  2019 LTIP PSU  01/28/19 01/14/19          25,322   37,983        274,997 
  2019 MIP(³)  02/26/19 02/26/19   562,500   1,002,375                

Donna F. Vieira

  2019
Sign-On RSU(4)
  01/28/19 11/28/18                41,436     449,995 
  2019 MIP(³)  02/26/19 02/26/19   562,500   1,002,375                

Nicolas Jafarieh

  2019 LTIP RSU  01/28/19 01/14/19                20,718     224,997 
  2019 LTIP PSU  01/28/19 01/14/19          20,718   31,077        224,997 
  2019 MIP(³)  02/26/19 02/26/19   425,000   757,350                

LOGO

Name

 Award Type(1)  

Grant

Date

  

Date of

Board

or
Committee

Action

  

Estimated Future

Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

  Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
  

All

Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)

  

Exercise
or

Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/
Share)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and

Option

Awards

($)(2)

 
 

Thresh
old

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Thresh
old

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

 

Jonathan W. Witter

  2022 LTIP RSU   2/18/22   2/16/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  124,750   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  2,499,990 
  2022 LTIP PSU   2/18/22   2/16/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  131,578   197,367   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  2,873,664 
  2022 AIP(3)   5/18/22   5/18/22  

 

 

 

  1,650,000   3,300,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven J. McGarry

  2022 LTIP RSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  22,455   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  449,998 
  2022 LTIP PSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  23,684   35,526   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  517,259 
  2022 AIP(3)   5/18/22   5/18/22  

 

 

 

  772,500   1,545,000  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kerri A.
Palmer

  2022 LTIP RSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  17,465   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  349,999 
  2022 LTIP PSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  18,421   27,632   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  402,315 
  2022 AIP(3)   5/18/22   5/18/22  

 

 

 

  708,125   1,416,250  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel P. Kennedy

  2022 LTIP RSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  22,455   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  449,998 
  2022 LTIP PSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  23,684   35,526   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  517,259 
  2022 AIP(3)   5/18/22   5/18/22  

 

 

 

  611,563   1,223,126  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donna F.
Vieira

  2022 LTIP RSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  21,207   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  424,988 
  2022 LTIP PSU   2/18/22   2/15/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  22,368   33,552   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  488,517 
  2022 AIP(3)   5/18/22   5/18/22   

 

 

 

 

 

  611,563   1,223,126   

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

RSU and PSU awards are eligible to accrue dividends as Dividend Equivalent Units (“DEUs”), which vest on the same schedule as the underlying grant.

 

(2)

The grant date fair value of the RSU awards is determined by multiplying the original number of RSUs granted by the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date. The Company did not issue fractional RSUs to account for the number between the grant date fair value and the amount approved by the NGCCompensation Committee. No discounts have been applied to reflect the delayed vesting of these awards. The PSU fair value is determined by using a 20 day trading average leading up to the grant date to determine a target number of awards granted, multiplied by the fair value as determined under ASC Topic 718.

 

(3)

For Mr. Quinlan,Witter, Mr. McGarry, Ms. Palmer, Mr. Thome,Kennedy, and Ms. Vieira, and Mr. Jafarieh, the “Target” and “Maximum” amounts set forth in this row in the “Estimated Future Payouts underNon-Equity Incentive Plan Awards” column constitutesconstitute each NEO’s target bonus and maximum bonus, respectively, potentially payable in cash under the 2019 MIP. 2019 MIP2022 AIP. 2022 AIP amounts were awarded in cash on February 7, 2020,28, 2023, and the actual amounts awarded are reported in the“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the 20192022 Summary Compensation Table.

 

(4)

Grant made pursuant to the commencement of employment of Ms. Vieira as the Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of the Company. The award will vest annually inone-third increments on the anniversary of the grant date.

2020 Proxy Statement54        SLM CORPORATION    49


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT 2019 FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2019 FISCALYEAR-END TABLEOutstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End Table

The table below sets forth information regarding Company options and stock awards of the NEOs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2019.2022.

 

    Option Awards  Stock Awards 

Name

     Grant Date     

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable

(#)(1)

 

Option Exercise
Price

($)

  Option
Expiration Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have  Not
Vested

(#)(2)(3)

  Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested
($)
(4)
 

Raymond J. Quinlan

   

 

—     

 

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

 

 

674,688   

 

 

 

6,011,472     

 

Steven J. McGarry

 

    01/27/2011    

 

 

30,000     

 

 

 

 

5.2430     

 

 

 

01/27/2021

 

  
  

 

—     

 

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

 

 

124,382   

 

 

 

1,108,241     

 

Paul F. Thome

 

01/27/2011

 

 

30,000     

 

 

 

 

5.2430     

 

 

 

01/27/2021

 

   
   

 

—     

 

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

 

 

103,433   

 

 

 

921,592     

 

Donna F. Vieira

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

 

 

41,959   

 

 

 

373,859     

 

Nicolas Jafarieh

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

—     

 

 

 

 

 

 

69,832   

 

 

 

622,205     

 

LOGO

Name

  Option Awards  Stock Awards
  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable

(#)

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable

(#)(5)

  

Option Exercise
Price

($)

  Option
Expiration Date
  

Number of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested

(#)(1)(2)

  Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested
($)(3)

Jonathan W. Witter(4)

        441,501    17.6500    2/5/31        

 

                    880,274    14,612,548

Steven J. McGarry

        99,337    17.6500    2/5/31        

 

                    114,207    1,895,813

Kerri A. Palmer

        77,262    17.6500    2/5/31        

 

                    57,997    962,737

Daniel P. Kennedy

        77,262    17.6500    2/5/31        

 

                    81,275    1,349,172

Donna F. Vieira

        77,262    17.6500    2/5/31        
 

 

                    100,958    1,675,906

 

(1)

Options granted in 2011 to Messrs. McGarry and Thome were fully vested as of January 27, 2014.

(2)

The vesting dates of the NEOs’ unvested RSU awards and any underlying DEUs that were outstanding as of December 31, 20192022 are:

 

LOGO

Name

  Grant Date  

# of RSUs

Underlying

Award

# of RSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2023

# of RSUs

Vesting -

Vesting Date
2024

# of RSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2025

Jonathan W. Witter(4)

   # of RSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
04/20/2020   246,819246,819-4/20

# of RSUs

Vesting -

Vesting
Date 2021

   # of RSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2022

Raymond J. Quinlan

01/27/2017

 

77,300

 

  02/05/202145,10622,552-2/522,554-2/5

 

77,300 - 01/27

 

  

 

02/18/2022

128,08542,694-2/1842,696-2/1842,695-2/18

01/26/2018

144,479

72,240 - 01/26

72,239 - 01/26

01/28/2019

156,376

52,125 - 01/28

52,126 - 01/28

52,125 - 01/28

Steven J. McGarry

  01/30/20209,9299,929-1/30

01/27/2017

  

 

13,427

 

  02/05/20219,7264,862-2/54,864-2/5

 

13,427 - 01/27

 

  02/18/202222,1097,369-2/187,370-2/187,370-2/18

Kerri A. Palmer

02/05/20217,8943,947-2/53,947-2/5

 

 

  02/18/202217,9325,976-2/185,977-2/185,979-2/18

Daniel P. Kennedy

01/30/202012,75212,752-1/30

 

 

01/26/2018

27,141

 

  02/05/20217,8943,947-2/53,947-2/5

 

13,571 - 01/26

 

  

13,570 - 01/26

 

02/18/2022

23,0557,685-2/187,685-2/187,685-2/18

01/28/2019

29,041

9,680 - 01/28

9,681 - 01/28

9,680 - 01/28

Paul F. Thome

01/27/2017

10,070

10,070 - 01/27

01/26/2018

23,193

11,596 - 01/26

11,597 - 01/26

01/28/2019

24,815

8,271 - 01/28

8,272 - 01/28

8,272 - 01/28

Donna F. Vieira

  01/30/20208,7688,768-1/30

01/28/2019

  

 

41,959

 

  02/05/20217,8943,947-2/53,947-2/5

 

13,986 - 01/28

 

13,986 - 01/28

13,987 - 01/28

Nicolas Jafarieh

01/27/2017

4,294

4,294 - 01/27

 

01/26/2018

17,429

 

  

8,714 - 01/26

 

02/18/2022

8,715 - 01/26

03/01/2018

6,148

3,074 - 03/01

3,074 - 03/01

   

01/28/2019

21,774  

20,979

 

7,258-2/18

6,993 - 01/28

  

6,993 - 01/28

 

7,258-2/18

6,993 - 01/28

7,258-2/18

 

50    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement2023 PROXY STATEMENT        55


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2019 FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

2022 FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

 

(3)(2)

The vesting dates of the NEOs’ unvested PSU awards (as measured at target) and any underlying DEUs that were outstanding as of December 31, 20192022 contingent upon the achievement of the performance goals at target are:

 

LOGO

Name

  Grant Date  

# of Performance

Underlying
Award (At
Target)

# of PSUs


Vesting -
Vesting Date
2023
# of PSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2024
# of PSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2025

Underlying
Award
Jonathan W. Witter(4)

   # of PSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
04/20/2020   # of PSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2021
249,413   # of PSUs
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2022
249,413 – 4/20  

Raymond J. Quinlan

  

01/27/2017

02/05/202175,755

75,755 – 2/5

02/18/2022135,096 

 

57,974 

 

  

 

57,974 - 01/27

 

  

 

135,096 – 2/18

01/26/2018

75,380   

75,380 - 01/26

01/28/2019

163,176   

163,176 - 01/28

Steven J. McGarry

  01/30/202031,08131,081 – 1/30

01/27/2017

02/05/202117,045

17,045 – 2/5

02/18/202224,317 

 

10,306 

 

  

 

10,306 - 01/27

 

  24,317 – 2/18

Kerri A. Palmer

02/05/202113,257

13,257 – 2/5

02/18/202218,914

 

 

  

 

18,914 – 2/18

Daniel P. Kennedy

02/05/202113,257

13,257 – 2/5

 

01/26/2018

02/18/202224,317 

 

14,160 

 

  

 

 

  

14,160 - 01/26

 

24,317 – 2/18

01/28/2019

30,304   

30,304 - 01/28

Paul F. Thome

01/27/2017

7,729   

7,729 - 01/27

01/26/2018

11,982   

11,982 - 01/26

01/28/2019

25,641   

25,641 - 01/28

Donna F. Vieira(5)

  01/30/202026,29926,299 – 1/30

  

 

 

 

  02/05/202113,257

 

 

  13,257 – 2/5

 

 

  02/18/202222,966

 

Nicolas Jafarieh

01/28/2019

 

20,979   

 

  

 

 

  

 

22,966 – 2/18

20,979 - 01/28

 

(4)(3)

Market value of shares or units is calculated based on the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 20192022 of $8.91.$16.60.

(4)

Mr. Witter’s commencement of employment as the Chief Executive Officer occurred on April 20, 2020, resulting in a combination of awards consisting of: (i) RSUs that vest in one-third increments over a three-year period; (ii) RSUs that vest over a three-year period in increments of 40 percent/40 percent/20 percent; and (iii) PSUs that vest in February 2023.

 

(5)

Ms. Vieira’s commencementThe vesting dates of employmentthe NEOs’ unvested premium priced stock options with an exercise price set at a 15 percent premium above the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant that were outstanding as the Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer occurred in January 2019, resulting in hersign-on award consisting of 100 percent RSUs that vest inone-third increments over a three-year period.December 31, 2022 are:

 

2020 Proxy StatementLOGO

Name

Grant Date

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable

(#)

# of Options
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2023
# of Options
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2024
# of Options
Vesting -
Vesting Date
2025

Jonathan W. Witter

02/05/2021441,501441,501 - 2/5

Steven J. McGarry

02/05/202199,33799,337 - 2/5

Kerri A. Palmer

02/05/202177,26277,262 - 2/5

Daniel P. Kennedy

02/05/202177,26277,262 - 2/5

Donna F. Vieira

02/05/202177,26277,262 - 2/5

56        SLM CORPORATION    51


Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2022


OPTION EXERCISESAND STOCK VESTEDIN 2019LOGO

 

    

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2019

 

   Option Awards       Stock Awards 

Name

  

Number of     

Shares Acquired     

on Exercise     

(#)     

  

Value Realized     

on Exercise     

($)     

  Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
(1)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(2)
 

Raymond J. Quinlan

  

  

  

 

475,816   

 

  

 

5,284,472   

 

Steven J. McGarry

  

  

  

 

75,526   

 

  

 

838,337   

 

Paul F. Thome

  

  

  

 

43,221   

 

  

 

478,929   

 

Donna F. Vieira

  

  

  

 

—   

 

  

 

—   

 

Nicolas Jafarieh

  

  

  

 

24,284   

 

  

 

269,248   

 

   Option Awards  Stock Awards

Name

  

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

  

Value Realized

on Exercise

($)

  

Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)

  

Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(1)

Jonathan W. Witter

            424,271    7,466,265

Steven J. McGarry

            80,884    1,521,736

Kerri A. Palmer

            3,843    76,629

Daniel P. Kennedy

            29,809    544,024

Donna F. Vieira

            26,726    488,516

 

(1)

Includes the vested PSUs from 2016 at 150% of target for Messrs. Quinlan and McGarry that were certified and vested by the NGC Committee in February 2019. Also includes any accrued DEUs.

(2)

The value realized on vesting is the number of shares vested, including any accrued DEUs where applicable, multiplied by the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the vesting date.

 

52    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement2023 PROXY STATEMENT        57


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATIONEquity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information as of December 31, 2019,2022 relating to equity compensation plans or arrangements pursuant to which options, restricted stock, RSUs, PSUs, stock units, or other rights to acquire shares may be granted from time to time.

 

Name

Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options and rights
(1)
Weighted average
exercise price
of outstanding
options and rights
Average
remaining life
(years) of
options
outstanding
Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance  under
equity
compensation
plans
Types of awards
issuable
(2)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

NQ, ISO, PSU, SAR, RES, RSU, ST

SLM Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Traditional options

 

 

 

Net-settled options

 

 

 

RSUs/RES/PSUs

 

5,298,006

 

 

Total

 

5,298,006

 

 

 

17,169,838

Employee Stock Purchase Plan(3)

 

 

 

 

14,645,894

NQ, RES

Expired Plans

NQ, ISO, RES, RSU, SU

Traditional options

 

 

 

Net-settled options

 

370,147

 

4.73

 

0.7

RSUs/PSUs

 

 

 

Total

 

370,147

 

4.73

 

0.7

 

Total approved by security holders

 

5,668,153

 

4.73

 

0.7

 

31,815,732

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

Compensation arrangements

 

 

 

 

Total not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

5,668,153

 

4,75

 

0.7

 

31,815,732

LOGO

Name

 Number of
securities to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options and rights
  Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options and rights
  Average
remaining life
(years) of
options
outstanding
  Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity
compensation
plans
  

Types of awards

issuable(1)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NQ, ISO, PSU, SAR, RES, RSU, ST

SLM Corporation 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional options

  (2)  $16.73   2.3  

 

 

 

 

 

Net-settled options

          

 

 

 

 

 

RSUs/RES/PSUs

  1,831,177         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

  1,831,177   16.73   2.3   18,707,336  NQ, ISO, PSU, SAR, RES, RSU, ST

Employee Stock Purchase Plan(3)

           14,149,397  Common Stock purchase right

Expired Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NQ, ISO, PSU, SAR, RES, RSU, ST

Traditional options

  (4)  $17.65   1.1  

 

 

 

 

 

Net-settled options

          

 

 

 

 

 

RSUs/RES/PSUs

  2,497,478         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

  2,497,478   17.65   1.1     

 

Total approved by security holders

  4,328,655   17.59   1.2   32,856,733  

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation arrangements

             

 

Total not approved by security holders

             

 

Total

  4,328,655  $17.59   1.2   32,856,733   

 

 

(1)

Upon exercise of anet-settled option, optionees are entitled to receive the spread shares only. The spread shares equal the gross number of options granted less shares withheld to cover the option exercise cost. Accordingly, this column reflects thenet-settled option spread shares issuable at December 31, 2019, where provided.Net-settled shares that are underwater are excluded from this table because their issuance would have an anti-dilutive effect.

(2)

NQ(Non-Qualified Stock Option), ISO (Incentive Stock Option), PSU (Performance Stock Unit), SAR (Stock Appreciation Rights), RES (Restricted/Performance Stock), RSU (Restricted Stock Unit), ST (Stock Awards), SU (Stock Units).and Common Stock purchase right.

(2)

Excludes 67,306 traditional options from this table because such traditional options are underwater and their issuance would have an anti-dilutive effect.

 

(3)

Number of shares available for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”)(ESPP) as of December 31, 2019.2022. The ESPP was amended and restated on June 25, 2014 and amended on June 25, 2015.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    53


NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATIONFOR FISCAL YEAR 2019
(4)

Excludes 998,891 traditional options from this table because such traditional options are underwater, and their issuance would have an anti-dilutive effect. The expired plan with outstanding equity awards is the SLM Corporation 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan, otherwise defined as the “Predecessor Plan”.

 

58        SLM CORPORATION


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019

Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees

The table below provides information about thenon-qualified nonqualified deferred compensation of the NEOs in 2019.2022. Under the Sallie Mae Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees (“DC Plan”), eligible employees may elect to defer up to 100 percent of their annual cash performance bonus and up to 85 percent of their base salary. Amounts deferred by plan participants are credited to record-keeping accounts, and participants are general creditors of the Company with regard to their accounts.

We make contributions to the DC Plan only if, and to the extent that, a participant’s deferral under this plan reduces the contribution that would have been made under ourtax-qualified defined contribution plan. No such contributions under the DC Plan were made for any NEO for 2019.2022. Participants’ accounts are credited with earnings based on the investment performance of underlying investment funds, as selected by participants. Our stock is one of the available investment options under the DC Plan. Earnings credited do not constitute “above-market” earnings as defined by the SEC. Earnings are credited daily.

Participants elect the time and form of payment of their accounts. Accounts may be distributed either in a lump sum, annual installments, or a formula acceptable to us. Accounts may also be paid while a participant is “in service” on apre-specified date, provided that the distribution date is at least two years after the date of the last deferral.

Supplemental 401(k) Savings Plan

Under the Sallie Mae Supplemental 401(k) Savings Plan (“Supplemental 401(k)”), eligible employees may elect to defer five percent of their base salary and annual bonus or up to $780,000$805,000 of total eligible pay.

We may also make matching contributions to a participant’s account. We will match a participant’s contribution after the participant completes 12 months of service. Participants are fully vested in our matching contributions at all times. Participants may elect to have their plan accounts deemed invested in the core investment funds offered under ourtax-qualified 401(k) plan, and earnings are credited to participants’ Supplemental 401(k) accounts when such amounts would have been credited under ourtax-qualified 401(k) plan. Earnings credited to the participants’ accounts do not constitute “above-market” earnings as defined by the SEC.

Participants elect the time and form of payment offrom their accounts. Accounts are paid in cash in a lump sum or by annual installments over 10 years. A participant may request an early distribution if the participant experiences a substantial, unforeseen financial hardship (as defined in the plan).

 

Name

Plan NameExecutive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last  FY
(1)
($)
Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)

Raymond J. Quinlan

Supplemental 401(k)

 

25,000

 

25,000

 

65,161

 

 

284,783

Steven J. McGarry

Supplemental 401(k)

 

25,000

 

25,000

 

88,816

 

 

435,564

DC Plan

 

 

 

4,761

 

 

21,121

Paul F. Thome

Supplemental 401(k)

 

25,000

 

25,000

 

50,964

 

 

425,996

Donna F. Vieira

 

 

 

 

 

Nicolas Jafarieh

 

 

 

 

 

LOGO

Name

 Plan Name  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
   Company
Contributions
in Last FY(1)
($)
   Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
($)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
 

Jonathan W. Witter

 Supplemental 401(k)   25,000    25,000    (15,174 

 

 

 

   96,925 

Steven J. McGarry

 Supplemental 401(k)   25,000    25,000    (165,923 

 

 

 

   638,302 

 

 DC Plan  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

   (6,020 

 

 

 

   28,105 

Kerri A. Palmer

 Supplemental 401(k)   25,000    25,000    (5,732 

 

 

 

   44,268 

 

 DC Plan   108,198   

 

 

 

   (10,889 

 

 

 

   97,309 

Daniel P. Kennedy

 Supplemental 401(k)   25,000    25,000    (94,039 

 

 

 

   444,475 

Donna F. Vieira

 Supplemental 401(k)   25,000    25,000    (25,544  

 

 

 

 

 

   144,410 

 

(1)

RegistrantCompany Contributions listed here are included under the heading “Employer Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans” in Footnote 85 to the Summary Compensation Table.

 

54    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement2023 PROXY STATEMENT        59


Arrangements with Named Executive Officers


ARRANGEMENTSWITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

ARRANGEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive Severance Plan

Under our long-standing Executive Severance Plan for Senior Officers, in effect until April 1, 2023, (the “Severance Plan”), eligible officers who do not have an individually negotiated severance arrangement will receivereceived a lump sum cash payment equal to: (1) a multiple of base salary and an average of the last 24 months of bonus compensation; plus(2) pro-ratedprorated target bonus for the year of termination, upon the following events: (a) resignation from employment for good reason (as defined in the plan); (b) our decision to terminate an eligible officer’s employment for any reason other than for cause (as defined in the plan); (c) death or disability; or (d) upon mutual agreement of the Company and the eligible officer. The multiplier for each eligible officer position isunder the Severance Plan was as follows: CEO (x 2.0); Higherhigher than Executive Vice President (x 1.5); Executive or Senior Vice President (x 1.0). Under the Severance Plan, in no event willdid a severance payment exceed a multiple of three times an officer’s base salary and incentive bonus.

In addition to the cash severance payment, eligible officers will receivereceived subsidized medical benefits and outplacement services for 18 months (24 months for the CEO). Treatment of equity upon severance is governed by the terms of the applicable equity agreement and not the Severance Plan. All payments and benefits provided under the Severance Plan are conditioned on the participant’s continuing compliance with the terms of the Severance Plan and the participant’s execution of a release of claims, covenant not to sue, andnon-competition noncompetition andnon-solicitation nonsolicitation agreements.

On February 15, 2023, the Board of Directors approved and adopted the Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan for Senior Officers (the “Amended and Restated Severance Plan”), effective as of April 1, 2023. Under the Amended and Restated Severance Plan, any employee of the Company and/or the Bank with a position at the level of Vice President or higher (including our NEOs) (the “Eligible Officers”) is eligible to receive severance payments and benefits in connection with the following termination events (in each case as defined in the Amended and Restated Severance Plan) (each, a “Qualifying Termination”): (i) a Termination of Employment Without Cause; (ii) a Termination of Employment For Good Reason; and (iii) a Termination of Employment By Job Abolishment. Subject to an Eligible Officer’s execution and nonrevocation of a customary release of claims and agreeing to certain restrictive covenants, an Eligible Officer who experiences a Qualifying Termination will receive the following severance payments and benefits: (a) an amount, in a lump sum payment, equal to (i) the applicable Multiplier (as described below), multiplied by (ii) the sum of (x) the Eligible Officer’s annual base salary and (y) the Eligible Officer’s target bonus opportunity for the year of termination (the “Severance Payment”); (b) outplacement services; and (c) COBRA continuation coverage for a specified period. For purposes of the Amended and Restated Severance Plan, the “Multiplier” is determined based on the Eligible Officer’s level as follows: (i) for the CEO, two (2); (ii) for an Eligible Officer with a title higher than Executive Vice President (such as Senior Executive Vice President or Vice Chairman) but not including the CEO, one and one half (1.5); (iii) for Executive Vice Presidents and Senior Vice Presidents, one (1), and (iv) for Vice Presidents, zero and three quarters (0.75). The Severance Payment will be subject to reduction in the event there is a risk element by which the Company determines that the Severance Payment must be reduced, regardless of whether the Eligible Officer was involved in the risk element. Subject to an Eligible Officer’s estate’s execution and nonrevocation of a customary release of claims, an Eligible Officer who experiences a termination of employment on account of death will receive an amount equal to the applicable Multiplier multiplied by the Eligible Officer’s annual base salary.

As of December 31, 2022, each of our NEOs was a participant in, and eligible to receive severance under, our Severance Plan. Effective as of April 1, 2023, each of our NEOs, other than Mr. McGarry due to the McGarry Retention Agreement (as defined below), participates in, and will be eligible to receive severance under, our Amended and Restated Severance Plan upon a Qualifying Termination.

60        SLM CORPORATION


ARRANGEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Change in Control Severance Plan

Under our long-standing Change in Control Severance Plan for Senior Officers (the “Change in Control Severance Plan”), if a termination of employment for reasons defined in the plan occurs within 24 months following a change in control of the Company, the participant is entitled to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to two times the sum of his or her base salary and average annual performance bonus (based on the prior two years). A participant will also be entitled to receive apro-rated prorated portion of his or her target annual performance bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, as well as continuation of medical insurance benefits for atwo-year period. Under the Change in Control Severance Plan, equity awards made before January 1, 2009 vest upon a change in control pursuant to their terms, regardless of whether the participant’s employment terminates, and equity awards granted after January 1, 2009 become vested andnon-forfeitable in connection with a change in control only if the participant’s employment is terminated or if the acquiring or surviving entity does not assume the awards. The Change in Control Severance Plan does not allow forgross-ups. All payments and benefits provided under the Change in Control Severance Plan are conditioned on the participant’s continuing compliance with the Change in Control Severance Plan and the participant’s execution of a release of claims, covenant not to sue, andnon-competition noncompetition andnon-solicitation nonsolicitation agreements.

Separation and Release Agreement with Mr. QuinlanKennedy    

After a thorough review of the Company’s organizational structure and needs, as well as a comprehensive search for Mr. Quinlan’s successor, in which Mr. Quinlan participated, the Company appointed Mr. Witter as its CEO. Accordingly,On March 30, 2023, the Company and Mr. Quinlan mutually agreed uponKennedy entered into an agreement and release (the “Kennedy Agreement”) under which Mr. Quinlan’sKennedy received severance plan benefits in connection with the termination of his employment by the Company without cause effective as of the close of business on March 1, 2023. Subject to Mr. Kennedy’s execution of a release of claims, covenant not to sue, and acceptance of certain restrictive covenants, in each case as set forth in the Severance Plan, Mr. Kennedy received severance payments and benefits set forth under the Severance Plan, which include the following: (i) a lump sum cash severance payment of $1,072,850 equal to the sum of (x) Mr. Kennedy’s latest base salary of $489,250 and (y) the annualized performance bonus compensation of $583,600 calculated based on the 24-month period immediately prior his separation fromdate; (ii) a lump sum payment of $152,891 equal to his target bonus for 2023, prorated to reflect the 3 months that Mr. Kennedy was employed by the Company in 2023; and (iii) if Mr. Kennedy elected to continue his participation in the Company’s group health insurance plan under applicable COBRA regulations, the Company would pay subsidized COBRA premiums for a period of up to 12 months. Pursuant to the 2021 Plan, and the applicable award agreements, all unvested, outstanding equity awards continue to vest on their original vesting terms and dates as set forth in the applicable award agreements.

Retention Agreement with Mr. McGarry

On March 2, 2023, the Company entered into a retention agreement with Mr. McGarry (the “McGarry Retention Agreement”). Pursuant to the McGarry Retention Agreement, Mr. McGarry will remain an employee of the Company and continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer through February 29, 2024 (the “Retention Agreement Effective Date”). During this time, he will assist with the selection of the next Chief Financial Officer and facilitate the orderly transition of the role to his successor. Mr. McGarry will retire as Chief Financial Officer and resign as an employee of the Company on April 9,the Retention Agreement Effective Date.

Effective as of March 1, 2023, Mr. McGarry’s annual base salary was increased to $700,000. Mr. McGarry’s target bonus percentage under the Company’s annual incentive plan and the determination of the target amounts under the Company’s LTIP remained the same. If Mr. McGarry remains employed by the Company through the Retention Agreement Effective Date, he will receive a cash retention bonus of $1.75 million (the “Retention Bonus”); provided that such Retention Bonus will also be subject to a determination by the Compensation Committee that Mr. McGarry has (i) adequately performed his duties to the Company during his tenure, (ii) satisfactorily participated in the development of his successor as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and (iii) reasonably assisted in the transition of his duties and responsibilities to such successor. The payment of the Retention Bonus is also subject to Mr. McGarry’s execution and nonrevocation of a release of claims in connection with his execution of the Retention Agreement, his reaffirmation of such release of claims on or immediately following the Retention Agreement Effective Date, and his continued compliance with any restrictive covenants, including those set forth in the aforementioned release. Mr. McGarry further agreed that, upon his resignation on the Effective Date, he would not be entitled to any payments or benefits, including any severance under the Amended and Restated Severance Plan. In the event that Mr. McGarry experiences a termination of employment by the Company other than a Termination of Employment For Cause (as such term is defined in the Amended and Restated Severance Plan), then Mr. McGarry will be entitled to payment of the Retention Bonus.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        61


ARRANGEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Offer Letter with Ms. Palmer

On January 7, 2021, the Company and Ms. Palmer entered into a letter agreement (the “Palmer Offer Letter”) pursuant to her commencement of employment as the Company’s Chief Risk and Compliance Officer on January 19, 2021. Pursuant to the Palmer Offer Letter, Ms. Palmer’s annual base salary was established at $550,000 and she was eligible to receive a target annual bonus set at 125 percent of her base salary and participate in the Company’s compensation and benefit plans. In addition, Ms. Palmer received a $700,000 equity grant in February 2021, subject to the terms and vesting conditions of the Company’s 2021 LTIP. Also, starting in 2022, Ms. Palmer was eligible to receive an equity grant based on the full year target level reward for her position, which was $550,000.

Offer Letter with Mr. Witter

On March 4, 2020, the Company and Mr. QuinlanWitter entered into ana letter agreement in connection with his separation from(the “Witter Offer Letter”) regarding Mr. Witter’s commencement as the Company pursuantCompany’s Chief Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Witter Offer Letter, Mr. Witter had an annual base salary of $950,000 and participated in the Company’s compensation and benefit plans. Pursuant to the Company’s 2020 LTIP, Mr. Witter received an equity grant on his start date based on the full-year target level award for his position, which for 2020 was $3,250,000, with the same terms and conditions as such grants made to the Company’s other executive officers in 2020. In addition, Mr. Witter received a sign-on equity grant equal to the value of his existing equity awards from his prior employer that were outstanding, unvested, and subject to forfeiture (excluding any awards he received from his prior employer in 2020), with such value based on the average closing price of his prior employer’s common stock for the 20-day trailing period ending on March 4, 2020, and the number of the Severance Plan described above, as appliedCompany’s shares underlying the RSUs based on the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock for the 20-day trailing period ending on April 20, 2020. To the extent any such outstanding equity awards from his prior employer were not forfeited, Mr. Witter would forfeit the number of the Company’s RSUs that hold an equivalent value to an executive officer whose separation from the Company was mutually agreed upon. Under the separation and release agreement, which contains a customary release of claims againstequity awards that were permitted to vest.

Offer Letter with Ms. Vieira

On September 13, 2018, the Company and restrictive covenantsMs. Vieira entered into a letter agreement (the “Vieira Offer Letter”) pursuant to her commencement of employment as the Company’s Chief Marketing Officer on January 14, 2019. Pursuant to the Vieira Offer Letter, Ms. Vieira’s annual base salary was established at $450,000, and she was eligible to receive a target annual bonus set at 125 percent of her base salary and participate in favorthe Company’s compensation and benefit plans. In addition, pursuant to her commencement of employment with the Company, includingMs. Vieira received a24-month noncompetitionone-time cash sign-on bonus of $550,000 and nonsolicitation covenant, Mr. Quinlan agreed to: (i) resign as CEO effective asan equity grant of April 19, 2020; (ii) no longer serve as a director or Chairman$450,000 in the form of RSUs that fully vested on January 28, 2022. Also, starting in 2020, Ms. Vieira became eligible to receive an equity grant based on the Board of Directors immediately following the Annual Meeting; and (iii) serve as a consultantfull-year target level reward for the Company through December 31, 2020. In consideration and following the Annual Meeting, Mr. Quinlan will be entitled to payments pursuant to the Severance Plan. In addition, in appreciation of Mr. Quinlan’s efforts in connection with the Company’s transition to a new CEO, the Company granted Mr. Quinlan a transition bonus. Mr. Quinlan will also be remunerated for his services as a consultant in order to leverage Mr. Quinlan’s deep expertise in and experience with the Company’s business and its stakeholders.her position, which was $450,000 at that time.

 

2020 Proxy Statement62        SLM CORPORATION    55


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROLPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The table below reflects the amount of compensation that would have been payable to Mr. Quinlan,Witter, Mr. McGarry, Ms. Palmer, Mr. Thome,Kennedy, and Ms. Vieira and Mr. Jafarieh on December 31, 2019,2022, if such individual’s employment had terminated on that date, given the individual’s compensation and service levels as of December 31, 2019.2022. The values reported in the table below with respect to equity vesting are based on the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 20192022 of $8.91$16.60 per share.

The following severance arrangements were effective for Mr. Quinlan,Witter, Mr. McGarry, Ms. Palmer, Mr. Thome,Kennedy, and Ms. Vieira and Mr. Jafarieh on December 31, 2019:2022: (i) the Severance Plan; (ii) the Change in Control Severance Plan; and (iii) equity acceleration and settlement provisions contained in awards issued pursuant to the 20122021 Plan and predecessor equity plans. The table below does not reflect the separation and release agreement with Mr. Quinlan, which was not in effect in 2019. Information relating to the separation and release agreement is contained in the Section titled “Arrangements with Named Executive Officers.”

 

56    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement2023 PROXY STATEMENT        63


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATIONOR CHANGEIN CONTROL TABLELOGO

 

    

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

   

Change in
Control
without
  Termination
(1)  

($)

  Change in
Control
with
Termination
without
Cause or
for Good
Reason
(2)
($)
  

 

Termination
by the
Company
without
Cause or by
the
Executive
for  Good
Reason
(3)
($)

    Termination  
by the
Company
with
Cause
(4)
($)
  Termination
by  the
Executive
upon
Retirement
(5)
($)
  Termination
by Death or
Disability
(6)
($)

Raymond J. Quinlan

                  

Equity Vesting

        6,640,787    6,640,787        6,640,787    6,640,787

Cash Severance

        5,978,040    5,018,123            5,018,123

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        23,438    38,438            38,438

Total

 

        12,642,265    11,697,348        6,640,787    11,697,348

Steven J. McGarry

                  

Equity Vesting

        1,548,883    1,548,883        1,548,883    1,548,883

Cash Severance

        3,214,000    1,346,375            1,346,375

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        32,551    39,414            39,414

Total

 

        4,795,434    2,934,672        1,548,883    2,934,672

Paul F. Thome

                  

Equity Vesting

        1,274,264    1,274,264        1,274,264    1,274,264

Cash Severance

        2,571,750    1,069,980            1,069,980

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        23,438    32,578            32,578

Total

 

        3,869,452    2,376,8222        1,274,264    2,376,822

Donna F. Vieira

                  

Equity Vesting

        373,859    373,859            373,859

Cash Severance

        2,571,750    1,008,563            1,008,563

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        33,221    39,916            39,916

Total

 

        2,978,830    1,422,338            1,422,338

Nicolas Jafarieh

                  

Equity Vesting

        731,486    731,486            731,486

Cash Severance

        2,113,100    906,738            906,738

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        35,977    41,983            41,983

Total

 

        2,880,563    1,680,207            1,680,207
   

Change in
Control
without
Termination(1)

($)

  Change in
Control
with
Termination
without
Cause or
for Good
Reason(2)
($)
  Termination
by the
Company
without
Cause or by
the
Executive
for Good
Reason(3)(4)
($)
  Termination
by the
Company
with
Cause(5)
($)
  Termination
by the
Executive
upon
Retirement(6)
($)
  Termination    
by Death or    
Disability(4)(7)    
($)    

Jonathan W. Witter

                  

Equity

        14,612,548    14,612,548          14,612,548    

Cash

        7,040,000    5,329,750          5,329,750

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        36,110    51,110          51,110

Total

        21,688,658    19,993,408   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

    19,993,408

Steven J. McGarry

                  

Equity

        1,895,813    1,895,813       1,895,813    1,895,813

Cash

        3,527,750    1,331,938       772,500    1,331,938

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        35,163    41,373          41,373

Total

        5,458,726    3,269,124   

 

 

 

    2,668,313    3,269,124

Kerri A. Palmer

                  

Equity

        962,737    962,737          962,737

Cash

        3,823,875    1,426,781          1,426,781

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        26,073    34,555          34,555

Total

        4,812,685    2,424,073   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

    2,424,073

Daniel P. Kennedy(8)

                  

Equity

        1,349,172    1,349,172          1,349,172

Cash

        2,690,875    1,083,875          1,083,875

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        25,713    34,285          34,285

Total

        4,065,760    2,467,332   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

    2,467,332

Donna F. Vieira

                  

Equity

        1,675,906    1,675,906          1,675,906

Cash

        3,057,813    1,153,109          1,153,109

Medical Insurance/Outplacement

        36,110    42,083          42,083

Total

        4,769,829    2,871,098    

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

    2,871,098

 

(1)

For Equity Vesting—Assumes all equity awards are assumed by the surviving/acquiring company in a change in control.

 

(2)

For Equity Vesting—Amounts shown are the value of RSU awards (including all dividend equivalents)DEUs) plus the spread value of net stock options that would vest for each individual on December 31, 2019,2022, based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on that date of $8.91.$16.60. Assumes RSUs and stock options are not assumed by the acquiring or surviving entity in a change of control. For medical Insurance/Outplacement—Consists of the Company’s estimated portion of the cost of health care benefits for 24 months.

 

(3)

For Equity Vesting—Upon termination, these awards generally continue to vest based on their original vesting terms. For Medical Insurance/Outplacement—Consists of the Company’s estimated portion of the cost of health care benefits for 18 months (24 months in Mr. Quinlan’sWitter’s case), plus $15,000 of outplacement services.

 

(4)

Effective as of April 1, 2023, each of our NEOs will participate in the Amended and Restated Severance Plan. Benefits set forth herein are provided under the Severance Plan, as described above, which was in effect on December 31, 2022.

(5)

For Equity Vesting—Vested and unvested equity awards forfeit upon a termination for cause (as defined in the plan)Predecessor Plan and the 2021 Plan).

 

64        SLM CORPORATION


POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL TABLE

(5)(6)

For Equity Vesting—Employees areas of December 31, 2022 employees were considered retirement eligible at age 55 or more, with 70 or more years of combined age and years of service with the Company or its subsidiaries. Upon eligible retirement, these awards generally continue to vest based on their original terms. On December 31, 2019, Mr. Quinlan,2022, Mr. McGarry and Mr. Thome werewas retirement eligible.

 

(6)(7)

For Equity Vesting—Unvested equity awards accelerate upon termination by death or disability (as defined in the plan)2021 Plan or the Predecessor Plan, as applicable). Amounts shown are the value of RSU awards plus the spread value of net stock options that would vest for each individual on December 31, 2019,2022, based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on that date of $8.91.$16.60.

(8)

On March 1, 2023, Mr. Kennedy’s employment with the Company was terminated without cause. Pursuant to the Kennedy Agreement, Mr. Kennedy received severance payments and benefits set forth in the Severance Plan consisting of the following: (i) a lump sum cash severance payment of $1,072,850 equal to the sum of (x) Mr. Kennedy’s latest base salary of $489,250 and (y) the annualized performance bonus compensation of $583,600 calculated based on the 24-month period immediately prior his separation date; (ii) a lump sum payment of $152,891 equal to his target bonus for 2023, prorated to reflect the 3 months that Mr. Kennedy was employed by the Company in 2023; and (iii) if Mr. Kennedy elected to continue his participation in the Company’s group health insurance plan under applicable COBRA regulations, the Company would pay subsidized COBRA premiums for a period of up to 12 months. Pursuant to the 2021 Plan, and the applicable award agreements, all unvested, outstanding equity awards continue to vest on their original vesting terms and dates as set forth in the applicable award agreements.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    572023 PROXY STATEMENT        65


2022 Pay Ratio Disclosure


Pay Ratio

2019 PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

LOGO

 

    

2019 PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

In accordance with the requirements of Section 953(b) of Dodd-Frank and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (which we collectively refer to as the “Pay Ratio Rule”), we are providing the following estimated information for 2022:

•  the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (except our CEO) was $102,318;

•  the annual total compensation of our CEO was $7,809,136; and

•  the ratio of these two amounts was 76 to 1. We believe that this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Pay Ratio Rule.

SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.

Pay Ratio

In accordance with the requirements of Section 953(b) of Dodd-Frank and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K (which we collectively refer to as the “Pay Ratio Rule”), we are providing the following estimated information for 2019:

the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (except our former CEO) was $72,550;

the annual total compensation of our former CEO was $6,062,247; and

the ratio of these two amounts was 84 to 1. We believe that this ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Pay Ratio Rule.

Our former CEO, Mr. Quinlan, served as our CEO through April 19, 2020.

SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.


Methodology for Identifying Ourour “Median Employee”

Pursuant to the SEC Rules, a company must identify its “median employee” once every three years, unless there has been a change in its employee population or employee compensation arrangements such that the company reasonably believes the change would result in a significant change in the CEO pay ratio. After a detailed review, we determined that it is appropriate to use the same median employee for the third year in a row, identified at December 31, 2020 because there have not been changes to our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we reasonably believe would result in a significant change in the CEO pay ratio. For your reference, we have provided the methodology below that was used last year to identify our “median employee.”

Employee Population

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our former CEO), we first identified our total employee population from which we determined our “median employee.” We determined that, as of December 31, 2019,2020, our employee population consisted of approximately 1,9001,600 individuals (as reported in Item 1,Business, in our 20192020 Form10-K). Our employee population consisted of our workforce of full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees.

We selected December 31, 2019,2020, which is within the last three months of 2019,2020, as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee” because we wanted to measure the median employee’s compensation on the same date our former CEO’s pay is calculated.

Determining our Median Employee

To identify our “median employee” from our total employee population, we compared the amount of base pay and bonus (base pay included all wages paid during the year, plus any equivalent paid time off, including but not limited to leave pay, military pay, volunteer pay and holiday pay, and the bonus calculation included any performance-based incentive payment). We identified our “median employee” using this compensation measure, which was consistently applied to all our employees included in the calculation. We did not make anycost-of-living adjustments in identifying our “median employee.”

Our Median Employee

Using the methodologies described above, we determined that our “median employee” was a full-time, salaried employee located in the United States who provides support in our operations business.

66        SLM CORPORATION


2022 PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

Determination of Annual Total Compensation of our “Median Employee” and our Former CEO

Once we identified our “median employee,” we then calculated such employee’s annual total compensation for 20192022 using the same methodology we used for purposes of determining the annual total compensation of our NEOs for 20192022 (as set forth in the 20192022 Summary Compensation Table on page 4752 of this proxy statement), adjusted to include the cost to the Company in 20192022 of specified employee benefits that are provided on anon-discriminatory nondiscriminatory basis, including employee assistance benefits (including tuition reimbursements and participation in a medical and wellness assistance program).

Our former CEO’s annual total compensation for 20192022 for purposes of the CEO Pay Ratio Rule is equal to the amount reported in the “Total” column in the 20192022 Summary Compensation Table, adjusted, to the extent applicable, in a similar manner as the annual total compensation of our “median employee.”

 

58    2023 PROXY STATEMENT        67


Pay Versus Performance
The following table show
s
the total compensation
for
ou
r
NEOs for the past three fiscal years as set for
th
in the Summary Compensation Table, the “compensation actually paid” to our CEOs (Raymond J. Quinlan through April 2
0
, 2020, identified below as “CEO 1”, and Mr. Witter for the remainder of 2020 to present, identified below as “CEO 2”), and on an average basis, our other NEOs (in each case, as determined under SEC rules), our TSR, our peer group TSR consisting of the S&P Super Composite Consumer Finance
Sub-Industry
Index, our net income, and our Company-Selected Measure, relative TSR against a defined group of peers.
LOGO
                 
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on:
          
                                
                
Fiscal
Year
(a)
 
SCT Total
for CEO 1
(b)
1
 
CAP to
CEO 1
(c)
2
 
SCT Total
for CEO 2
(d)
3
 
CAP to
CEO 2
(e)
2
 
Average
SCT Total
for other
NEOs
(f)
4
 
Average
CAP to
Other NEOs
(g)
2
    
TSR
(h)
5
   
Peer Group
TSR
(i)
5
   
Net Income
($ in mil-
lions)
(j)
     
Company-
Selected
Measure:
Relative
TSR
(k)
6
                
2022 $0 $0 $7,809,136 $3,242,518 $2,144,103 $1,683,781    $195.73   $110.91   $469.0     43rd
percentile
                
2021 $0 $0 $7,047,062 $19,612,482 $2,067,229 $2,891,752      $226.14   $137.67     $1,160.5       89th
percentile
                
2020 $9,819,626 $13,432,081 $11,106,257 $18,521,966 $1,993,290 $2,430,458    $140.90 
 
 
 $100.83   $880.7   
 
 
 98th
percentile
1The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Quinlan (our CEO until April 20, 2020) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Refer to the Summary Compensation Table as set forth on page 52 of our proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 22, 2021.
2The dollar amounts reported in columns (c), (e), and (g) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” (otherwise known as CAP), adjusted as follow in the table below, as determined in accordance with SEC rules. None of the equity awards held by our NEOs were forfeited during the preceding three years; therefore, no amounts are reported for forfeited awards. “Compensation actually paid” does not necessarily represent cash and/or equity value transferred to the applicable NEO without restriction, but rather is a value calculated under applicable SEC rules. We do not have a defined benefit plan, so no adjustment for pension benefits is included in the table below. Fair values set forth in the table below are computed in accordance with ASC 718 as of the end of the respective fiscal year, other than fair values of the awards that vest in the covered year, which are valued as of the applicable vesting date. Similarly, no adjustment is made for dividends because the amount associated with such dividends are reflected in the fair value of the award for the covered fiscal year. The reconciliation from the Summary Compensation Table to CAP is summarized in the table below.
68        
SLM CORPORATION

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
LOGO
Fiscal
Year
  
Executives
  
SCT
(a)
  
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
Reported
in SCT
(b)
  
Year End
Fair Value of
New
Awards
(i)
  
Change in
Fair Value of
Outstanding
Unvested
Awards
from Prior
Years
(ii)
 
Change in
Fair Value
of Awards
from Prior
Years that
Vested
(iii)
 
Total Equity
CAP
(c)=(i)+(ii)+(iii)
  
CAP
(d) =(a)-(b)+(c)
                       
         
2022  CEO 1  $0  $0  $0  $0 $0 $0  $0  
   CEO 2  $7,809,136  $5,373,654  $4,496,776  ($2,877,215) ($812,525) $807,036  $3,242,518
   Other NEOs  $2,144,103  $900,083  $749,279  ($284,324) ($25,193) $439,762  $1,683,781
         
2021  CEO 1  $0  $0  $0  $0 $0 $0  $0
   CEO 2  $7,047,062  $4,223,345  $5,721,809  $8,549,142 $2,517,814 $16,788,765  $19,612,482
   Other NEOs  $2,067,229  $791,863  $1,069,779  $514,876 $31,731 $1,616,386  $2,891,752
         
2020  CEO 1  $9,819,626  $3,487,623  $3,957,718  $2,199,774 $942,586 $7,100,078  $13,432,081
   CEO 2  $11,106,257  $8,824,635  $16,240,344  $0 $0 $16,240,344  $18,521,966
 
 
  Other NEOs  $1,993,290  $569,479  $649,801  $248,107 $108,739 $1,006,647  $2,430,458
(a)
The dollar amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicabl
e
ye
ar.
(b)The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year.
(c)The recalculated value of equity awards for each applicable year includes the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following:
(i)
the
year-end
fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year;
(ii)the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year;
(iii)for awards that vest in the applicable year, the change in the fair value as of the vesting date from the beginning of the applicable year.
While the equity awards disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table are based on the grant date fair values computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the equity award values disclosed pursuant to CAP in the table above are calculated in the following manner:
The stock prices used to calculate the figures in columns (i) and (ii) in the above table are as follows: $8.91 on December 31, 2019, $12.39 on December 31, 2020, Proxy Statement$19.67 on December 31, 2021, and $16.60 on December 31, 2022. The stock prices used to calculate the figures in column (iii) in the above table are based on the closing prices on the vesting dates of the applicable awards.
The valuation assumptions and processes used to recalculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant.
(d)“Compensation actually paid” does not necessarily represent cash and/or equity value transferred to the applicable NEO without restriction, but rather is a value calculated under applicable SEC rules.
3The dollar amounts reported in column (d) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. Witter (our CEO from April 20, 2020 to present) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Refer to the Summary Compensation Table as set forth on page 52 of this proxy statement.
4The dollar amounts reported in column (f) are the average amounts of total compensation reported for the other Named Executive Officers for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Refer to the Summary Compensation Table as set forth on page 52 of this proxy statement. For each of 2020, 2021 and 2022, the other NEOs were:
2022Steven J McGarry, Kerri Palmer, Donna Vieira, Daniel Kennedy
2021Steven J McGarry, Kerri Palmer, Donna Vieira, Daniel Kennedy
2020Steven J McGarry, Paul Thome, Donna Vieira, Daniel Kennedy
2023 PROXY STATEMENT
        69

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
5
TSR is determined based on the value of an initial fixed investment of $100. The TSR peer group consists of the S&P Super Composite Consumer Finance Sub Industry Index, which is used for our Stock Performance presentation set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2022.
6
Our Company-Selected Measure is Relative TSR consistent with the peer group used in the PSU metric under our annual Long Term Incentive Program. For illustrative purposes, calculations within this column are based on
1-year
measurements (as opposed to the
3-year
relative TSR performance period regarding the Company’s PSUs). For purposes of relative TSR, the peer group used in the PSU metric under our annual Long-Term Incentive Program consists of: (i) the S&P Super Composite Consumer Finance Sub Industry Index and (ii) the S&P 400 Regional Bank
Sub-Industry
Ind
e
x.
Relationship Between “Compensation Actually Paid” and Performance Measure
s
The following graphs illustrate the alignment between compensation actually paid to the NEOs and the Company’s performance, consistent with our compensation philosophy as described in the CD&A on page 30. Specifically, a large portion of the NEOs’ compensation is reliant on TSR and as such the CEO and Other NEOs’ “compensation actually paid” each year was aligned with our TSR performance and increased when our TSR performance increased but declined when our TSR performance declined. The charts below show, for the past three years, the relationship of the Company’s TSR relative to the Company’s TSR peer group as well as the relationship between the CEO and Other NEOs’ “compensation actually paid” and (i) the Company’s TSR; (ii) the Company’s net income; and (iii) the Company-Selected Measure, relative TSR.
Compensation Actually Paid against Company and Peer Group TSR
LOGO
Compensation Actually Paid against Net Income
LOGO
70        
SLM CORPORATION

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
Compensation Actually Paid against Relative TSR Percentile
LOGO
2022 Performance Measures
TheCompensation Committee uses a mix of performance measures throughout the AIP and LTIP in order to align executive pay with Company performance. As required by SEC rules, the performance measures identified as the most important for NEOs’ 2022 compensation decisions are listed in the table to the right. These performance measures are each described in more detail in the CD&A.
LOGO
Most Important Performance Measures
Relative TSR
Pre-Tax,
Pre-Provision,
Pre-Operating
Expense Income Per Share
Private Education Loan Originations
Operating Expenses
Net Charge-Offs
2023 PROXY STATEMENT
        71


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONDirector Compensation

Our directors’director compensation program is designed to reasonably compensate ournon-employee directors for work required for a company of our size and to align the directors’ interests with that of our stockholders. The NGCCompensation Committee reviews the compensation level of ournon-employee directors on an annual basis and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors.

2019 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE2022 Director Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, relating to compensation paid to or accrued by us on behalf of ournon-employee directors who served in this capacity during 2019.2022.

 

Name

  

 

Fees
Earned
or Paid
in  Cash
($)
(1)

  Stock
Awards
($)
(2)
  

Option
  Awards  

($)(3)

  

All Other
  Compensation  

($)(4)

  Total($)
     

Paul G. Child

    122,500    99,999        14    222,513
     

Mary Carter Warren Franke

    95,000    99,999        21    195,020
     

Earl A. Goode

    100,000    99,999        11    200,010
     

Marianne M. Keler

    102,500    99,999        21    202,520
     

Mark L. Lavelle(5)

    65,000    99,999        16    165,015
     

Jim Matheson

    90,000    99,999        21    190,020
     

Jed H. Pitcher(6)

    52,500            6    52,506
     

Frank C. Puleo

    105,000    99,999        14    205,013
     

Vivian C. Schneck-Last

    95,000    99,999        21    195,020
     

William N. Shiebler

    105,000    99,999        11    205,010
     

Robert S. Strong

    95,000    99,999        14    195,013
     

Kirsten O. Wolberg

    90,000    99,999        21    190,020

LOGO

Name

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)(1)
    Stock
Awards
($)(2) (3)
  

Option
Awards

($)(4)

  

All Other
Compensation

($)(5)

 Total($)

R. Scott Blackley

    11,875  

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

    2   11,877    

Paul G. Child

    110,000  

 

 

 

    124,985   

 

 

 

    21   235,006

Mary Carter Warren Franke

    218,333  

 

 

 

    124,985   

 

 

 

    21   343,339

Marianne M. Keler

    105,000  

 

 

 

    124,985   

 

 

 

    21   230,006

Mark L. Lavelle

    15,000  

 

 

 

    211,619   

 

 

 

    21   226,640

Ted Manvitz

    12,500  

 

 

 

    208,287   

 

 

 

    21   220,808

Jim Matheson

    60,000  

 

 

 

    159,971   

 

 

 

    21   219,992

Frank C. Puleo

    27,500  

 

 

 

    17,498   

 

 

 

    50,011(6)    95,009

Samuel T. Ramsey

    80,000  

 

 

 

    124,985   

 

 

 

    21   205,006

Vivian C. Schneck-Last

    100,000  

 

 

 

    124,985   

 

 

 

    21   225,006

Robert S. Strong

    65,000  

 

 

 

    159,971   

 

 

 

    21   224,992

Kirsten O. Wolberg

    90,833   

 

 

 

 

 

    124,985    

 

 

 

 

 

    21   215,839

 

(1)

Director fees are paid quarterly in arrears.

 

(2)

Thenon-employee directors elected to our Board of Directors at the 20192022 Annual Meeting each received a restricted stock award on June 20, 201921, 2022, which vests in full upon the 20202023 Annual Meeting, scheduled to be held on June 18, 2020.Meeting. The grant date fair market value for each share of restricted stock granted on June 20, 201921, 2022 to directors is based on the closing market price of our stock on June 20, 2019,21, 2022, which was $9.26.$15.68. Additional details on accounting for stock-based compensation can be found in Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies”Policies,” and Note 13,16, “Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Arrangements”Arrangements,” of Sallie Mae’s Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 20192022 Form10-K. Each director elected at the 2022 Annual Meeting received a total of 10,7997,971 shares of restricted Common Stock as a result of the aforementioned awards that will vest upon the Company’s 20202023 Annual Meeting on June 18, 2020 if the director is still incumbent at that time. After the Company’s 2021 Annual Meeting, non-employee directors were given the option to receive shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash paid quarterly, pertaining to the Board of Directors’ annual cash retainer. Mr. Lavelle, Mr. Manvitz, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Puleo, and Mr. Strong each elected this option. For 2022, Mr. Puleo only received the equity option in March 2022 due to his retirement from the Board of Directors on June 21, 2022. Such grants of Common Stock in lieu of cash were awarded on March 24, 2022 and June 23, 2022 based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on those particular days, $18.17 and $15.67, respectively. After the Company’s 2022 Annual Meeting, non-employee directors were given the option to receive shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash pertaining to the Board of Directors’ annual cash retainer and, as applicable, any retainer received for service as Board Chair, committee chair, or member of any committee of the Board of Directors. Mr. Lavelle and Mr. Manvitz each elected this option. Such grants of Common Stock in lieu of cash were awarded on September 21, 2022 and December 21, 2022 based on the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on those particular days, $15.10 and $16.63, respectively.

72        SLM CORPORATION


2022 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

(3)

Stock Awards outstanding as of December 31, 2022 for each director consisted of restricted stock awards (including DEUs), as follows: R. Scott Blackley – 0; Paul G. Child – 8,081; Mary Carter Warren Franke – 8,081; Marianne M. Keler – 8,081; Mark L. Lavelle – 8,081; Ted Manvitz – 8,081; Jim Matheson – 8,081; Frank C. Puleo – 0; Samuel T. Ramsey –8,081; Vivian C. Schneck-Last – 8,081; Robert S. Strong – 8,081; Kirsten O. Wolberg – 8,081.

 

(3)(4)

We did not grant any stock options to thenon-employee directors during 2019.2022. Thenon-employee directors’ vested and outstanding stock options are reported in the Ownership of Common Stock by Directors and Executive Officers section in this proxy statement.

 

(4)(5)

Includes annual premiums paid by us to provide a life insurance benefit of $50,000.

 

(5)

Mr. Lavelle joined the Board of Directors on April 1, 2019.

(6)

In connection with Mr. Pitcher did not seekre-election at the June 20, 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and retiredPuleo’s retirement from the Board of Directors on June 20, 2019.21, 2022, The Sallie Mae Fund, an affiliate of the Company, made a charitable donation in the amount of $50,000 on his behalf.

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    59


2019 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

Director Compensation Elements

The following table highlights the material elements of our 20192022 director compensation program:

LOGO

    

Membership/RetainerRetainer*

  

Annual Cash Retainer

Board of Directors Retainer

   $ 70,000    

Board of Directors Retainer

$70,000

Lead Independent DirectorBoard Chair Retainer

  $35,000$125,000    

Committee Chair Retainer

      

•  Audit Committee

  $25,000$ 30,000    

•  Nominations and Governance andCommittee

$ 20,000    

  Compensation Committee

  $20,000$ 25,000    

•  Financial Risk Committee

  $20,000$ 20,000    

•  Operational and Compliance Risk Committee

  $20,000 20,000    

•   Strategic Planning Committee

$10,000

Committee Membership Retainer

 

•  Audit Committee

  $10,000$ 15,000    

•  Nominations and Governance andCommittee

$ 10,000    

  Compensation Committee

  $10,000$ 12,500    

•  Financial Risk Committee

  $10,000$ 10,000    

•  Operational and Compliance Risk Committee

  $10,000$ 10,000    

•   Strategic Planning Committee

*
$  5,000

Certain directors elected to receive shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash pertaining to the Board of Directors’ quarterly cash retainer under the 2021-2022 director compensation program. In the 2022-2023 director compensation program, certain directors elected to receive shares of Common Stock in lieu of cash pertaining to their quarterly cash retainer and respective committee fees.

In addition to the Committeescommittees above, some of ournon-employee directors are also members of our Preferred Stock Committee. No fees were paid in 20192022 in connection with this Committee.committee.

In addition to the cash retainers set forth above, ournon-employee directors each received $100,000$125,000 in restricted stock awards, which resulted in a grant date fair value of $99,999.$124,985. These restricted stock awards will vest and become transferable upon the Company’s 20202023 Annual Meeting. These awards will be forfeited if the grantee ceases to be a member of the Board of Directors prior to the vesting event for any reason other than death, disability, or change of control.

We reimburse directors for anyout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with service as a director.

Directors’Director compensation is determined by the Board of Directors, and the NGCCompensation Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors based on periodic benchmarking assessments and advice received from the NGCCompensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. In making recommendations to the Board of Directors, the NGCCompensation Committee considers the competitive positioning of the aggregate and individual components of compensation, as well as the mix of pay and structure versus both direct competitors and other comparable companies. The NGCCompensation Committee also considers the unique skill set required to serve on our Board of Directors and the time commitment associated with preparation for and attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees as well as external commitments, such as engagement with our stockholders and regulators.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        73


2022 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We maintain stock ownership guidelines for ournon-employee directors. Under our stock ownership guidelines, each director is expected, within five years of initial election to the Board of Directors, to own Common Stock with a value equivalent to four times his or her annual cash retainer for serving on our Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2019,2022, all then currentthen-current directors were in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines or are expected to achieve compliance within the applicable five-year period.

Other Compensation

We providenon-employee directors with company-paidCompany-paid business travel accident insurance.insurance, as well as annual premiums paid by us to provide a life insurance benefit.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Under our Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (“Director Deferral Plan”),non-employee directors may elect annually to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual retainer. Deferrals are credited with earnings based on the performance of certain investment funds selected by the participant. Deferrals are fully vested at all times and are payable in cash (in lump sum or in installments at the election of the director) or Company stock upon termination of the director’s service on the Board of Directors (except for hardship withdrawals in limited circumstances). During 2019,2022, none of thenon-employee directors actively participated in the Director Deferral Plan.

 

60    74        SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


Other Matters


OTHER MATTERS

OTHER MATTERS

Other Matters for the 20202023 Annual Meeting

As of the date of this proxy statement, there are no matters the Board of Directors intends to present for a vote at the Annual Meeting other than the business items discussed in this proxy statement. In addition, Sallie Mae has not been notified of any other business proposed to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If other matters now unknown to the Board of Directors come before the Annual Meeting, the proxy given by a stockholder electronically, telephonically, or on a proxy card gives discretionary authority to the persons named by Sallie Mae to serve as proxies to vote such stockholder’s shares on any such matters in accordance with their best judgment.

Stockholder Proposals for the 20212024 Annual Meeting

A stockholder who intends to introduce a proposal for consideration at Sallie Mae’s 20212024 annual meeting may seek to have that proposal and a statement in support of the proposal included in the Company’s 20212024 proxy statement if the proposal relates to a subject that is permitted under Rule14a-8 of the Exchange Act (“Rule14a-8”). To be considered for inclusion, the proposal and supporting statement must be received by the Company no later than January 5, 2021,2024 at the office of the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal executive offices, located at 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713, and must satisfy the other requirements of Rule14a-8. The submission of a stockholder proposal does not guarantee it will be included in Sallie Mae’s 20212024 proxy statement.

Sallie Mae’sBy-Laws provide that a stockholder may otherwise propose business for consideration or nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors, in compliance with federal proxy rules, applicable state law and other legal requirements, and without seeking to have the proposal included in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule14a-8. Sallie Mae’sBy-Laws provide that any such proposals or nominations and any nominations to be included in Sallie Mae’s proxy statement pursuant to proxy access provisions of our By-Lawsfor our 20212024 annual meeting must be received by it not earlier than the close of business on February 18, 2021,21, 2024, nor later than the close of business on March 20, 2021. Any such notice22, 2024. All notices must satisfy the other requirements in Sallie Mae’sBy-Laws applicable to such proposals, nominations, and nominations.proxy access. If a stockholder fails to meet these deadlines or fails to comply with the requirements of Rule14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act, Sallie Mae may, in certain circumstances exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies it solicits to vote on any such proposal.

In addition to complying with the advance notice provisions of our By-Laws, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees, other than the Company’s nominees, must also comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19, which requires, among other things, that a stockholder provide notice that includes certain information, which notice must be received by the Company’s Corporate Secretary no later than April 21, 2024, which is 60 calendar days prior to the anniversary of this year’s meeting date.

Solicitation Costs

All expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting will be paid by us. In addition, officers, directors, regular employees, or other agents of Sallie Mae may solicit proxies by telephone, telefax, personal calls, or other electronic means. We will request banks, brokers, custodians, and other nominees in whose names shares are registered to furnish to the beneficial owners of Sallie Mae’s Common Stock Notices of Availability of the materials related to the Annual Meeting, and including, if so requested by the beneficial owners, paper copies of the 20192022 Form10-K, this proxy statement, and the proxy card and, upon request, we will reimburse such registered holders for theirout-of-pocket and reasonable expenses in connection therewith.

Householding

To reduce the expense of delivering duplicate proxy materials to stockholders who may have more than one account holding stock but sharing the same address, we have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called “householding.” Under this procedure, certain registered stockholders who have the same address and last name, and who do not

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        75


OTHER MATTERS

participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials, will receive one copy of the Notice of Availability and, as applicable, any additional proxy materials that are delivered until such time as one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they want to receive separate copies. We hereby undertake to deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of the Notice of Availability or proxy materials, as the case may be, to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document(s) was delivered. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to have access to and utilize separate proxy voting instructions.

If you are a registered stockholder and would like to have separate copies of the Notice of Availability or proxy materials mailed to you in the future, or you would like to have a single copy of the Notice of Availability or proxy materials mailed to you in the future, you must submit a request in writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717 or by calling1-866-540-7095. If you are a beneficial stockholder, please contact your bank or broker to opt in or out of householding.

However, please note that if you want to receive a separate proxy card or vote instruction form or other proxy materials for purposes of this year’s Annual Meeting, you should follow the instructions included in the Notice of Availability that was sent to you and we will deliver, promptly upon written or oral request, separate copies of the proxy materials for this year’s Annual Meeting.

 

2020 Proxy Statement76        SLM CORPORATION    61


Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting


QUESTIONSAND ANSWERS ABOUTTHE ANNUAL MEETINGAND VOTING

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Who may vote?Only stockholders who owned shares of our Common Stock, par value $.20 per share, at the close of business on April 21, 2020,2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Sallie Mae’s Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ under the symbol “SLM.” On April 21, 2020, 375,096,4582023, 242,378,966 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted.

Why did I receive a “Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials”? We are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. By doing so, we save costs and reduce the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting. On or about May 5, 2020,4, 2023, we mailedmail a Notice ofRegarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Availability”) to the Company’s stockholders. The Notice of Availability contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online or vote by telephone. The Notice of Availability also contains a16-digit control number that you will need to vote your shares. If you previously chose to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive access to these materials via ane-mail email that will provide electronic links to these documents unless you elect otherwise.

How do I request paper copies of the proxy materials? You may request paper copies of the proxy materials for the Annual Meeting by following the instructions listed in the Notice of Availability, atwww.proxyvote.com, by telephoning1-800-579-1639, or by sending ane-mail email tosendmaterial@proxyvote.com.

What is the difference between holding shares as a beneficial owner in street name and as a stockholder of record?If your shares are held in street name through a broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee how to vote your shares. Without your voting instructions, your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee may only vote your shares on routine matters. Routine mattersDO NOT include Proposals 1, 2, and 2,3 but do include Proposal 34 (relating to the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm). Fornon-routine matters, your shares will not be voted without your specific voting instructions. Accordingly, Sallie Mae encourages you to vote your shares.

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered to be a stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to Sallie Mae or to a third party, or to vote at the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?We encourage stockholders to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You may vote in one of the following ways:

 

 

By Internet prior to the meeting. You may vote electronically via the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com. Votes submitted via the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 17, 2020.19, 2023. Please have your Notice of Availability or proxy card available when you log on.

 

 

By Telephone. If you wish to vote by telephone, you may call the toll-free telephone number on the Notice of Availability or your proxy card, which is available24-hours a day, and follow thepre-recorded prerecorded instructions. Please have your Notice of Availability or proxy card available when you call. If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee may provide you additional instructions regarding voting your shares by telephone. Votes submitted telephonically must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 17, 2020.19, 2023.

 

 

By Internet during the meeting.You may vote electronically via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020SLM2023.

 

 

By Mail. If you hold your shares in street name throughreceive a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, to vote by mail you must request paper copiescopy of the proxy materials. Once you receive your paper copies,materials, you will need to mark, sign, and date the proxy card or the voting instruction form and return it in the prepaid return envelope provided. Your proxy card or voting instruction form must be received no later than the close of businessdate indicated on June 17, 2020. If you hold your shares directly in your name as a stockholder of record, to vote by mail you must request paper copies of the proxy materials. Once you receive your paper copies, you will need to mark, sign and date the proxy card and return it in the prepaid return envelope provided. Your proxy card must be received no later than the close of business on June 17, 2020.or voting instruction form.

62    SLM CORPORATION2020 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONSAND ANSWERS ABOUTTHE ANNUAL MEETINGAND VOTING

What if I hold my shares in street name and I do not provide my broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee with instructions about how to vote my shares? You may instruct your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee about how to vote your shares using the methods described above. If you do not provide voting instructions to the firm that holds your shares prior to the Annual Meeting, the firm has discretion to vote your shares with respect to Proposal 34 on the proxy

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        77


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

card (relating to the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm), which is considered a routine matter. However, the firm will not have discretion to vote your shares with respect to Proposals 1, 2, and 23 on the proxy card, as these are each considered to be anon-routine matter. You are encouraged to participate in the election of directors and vote on all of the proposals by returning your voting instructions to your broker, bank, trustee, or other nominee.

How do proxies work?The Board of Directors is requesting your proxy. Giving your proxy means you authorize the persons named as proxies therein to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you specify in your proxy (or to exercise their discretion as described herein). If you hold your shares as a record holder and sign and return a proxy card but do not specify how to vote on a proposal, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. The Board of Directors has recommended that stockholders vote:

 

FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1;

FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named in Proposal 1;

 

FOR” advisory approval of Sallie Mae’s executive compensation set forth in Proposal 2; and

FOR” advisory approval of Sallie Mae’s executive compensation set forth in Proposal 2;

 

“1 YEAR” as the frequency of future advisory votes on Sallie Mae’s executive compensation as set forth in Proposal 3; and

FOR” ratification of the appointment of Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm set forth in Proposal 3.

FOR” ratification of the appointment of Sallie Mae’s independent registered public accounting firm set forth in Proposal 4.

In the absence of voting instructions to the contrary, shares of Common Stock represented by validly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the foregoing recommendations. Sallie Mae does not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting as of the date of this proxy statement.

Can I change my vote?Yes. If you hold your shares as a record holder, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time prior to the final tallying of votes by:

 

Delivering a written notice of revocation toSallie Mae’s Corporate Secretary at theOffice of the Corporate Secretary, 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713;

Delivering a written notice of revocation to Sallie Mae’s Corporate Secretary at the Office of the Corporate Secretary, 300 Continental Drive, Newark, Delaware 19713;

 

 

Submitting another timely vote via the Internet, by telephone, or by mailing a new proxy (following the instructions listed under the “How do I vote?” section); or

 

Voting at the Annual Meeting live via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020.

Voting at the Annual Meeting live via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2023.

If your shares are held in street name, contact your broker, bank, trustee, or nominee for instructions on how to revoke or change your voting instructions.

What constitutes a quorum?A quorum is necessary to transact business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum exists if the holders of a majority in voting power of the Common Stock and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are present in person or represented by proxy, at the Annual Meeting, including proxies on which abstentions (withholding authority to vote) are indicated. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will be counted in determining whether a quorum exists. Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting constitutes presence for purposes of a quorum.

Who will count the vote?Votes will be tabulated by our General Counsel,Chief Legal, Government Affairs & Communications Officer, who will act as the Inspector of Elections at the Annual Meeting.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting? Only holders of Common Stock as of the record date, April 21 2020,2023, or duly appointed proxies, may attend. No one who is not a shareholderstockholder will be allowed to attend the Annual Meeting.

What do I need to attend the Annual Meeting? You may attend the Annual Meeting live via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020. ShareholdersSLM2023 Stockholders will need the16-digit control number provided on their proxy card, voting instruction form, or notice. We suggest you log in at least 15 minutes before the start of the meetingmeeting.

78        SLM CORPORATION


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Can I ask questions at the Annual Meeting? Shareholders Stockholders as of our record date will have an opportunity to submit questions live via the Internet during the meeting.

 

2020 Proxy StatementSLM CORPORATION    63LOGO

How to Participate in
the Annual Meeting

Online:

1. Visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2023 and

2. Enter the 16-digit control number included on your Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials on your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials), or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials.

The meeting will begin promptly at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 20, 2023. We suggest you log in to the meeting platform at least 15 minutes before the start of the meeting.

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting? We will publish the voting results of the Annual Meeting on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days following the end of our Annual Meeting.

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        79


Appendix A

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

LOGO

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2022  

Non-GAAP “Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income” adjustments to GAAP:

   

 

 

 

GAAP net income

   $469,014

Preferred stock dividends

    9,029

GAAP net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock

    459,985

Non-GAAP “Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income” adjustments to GAAP:

   

 

 

 

Add provisions for credit losses

    633,453

Add total non-interest expenses

    559,241

Add income tax expense

    161,711

Add preferred stock dividends

    9,029

Total Non-GAAP “Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense” adjustments to GAAP

    1,363,434

Non-GAAP “Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income”

   $1,823,419

GAAP diluted earnings per common share

    1.76

Total adjustments

    5.21

Non-GAAP “Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision, Pre-Operating Expense Income” per share

    6.97

Additional modifications to Non-GAAP metric approved by Compensation Committee to omit negative impact of deterioration in valuation of certain non-marketable securities owned by Company

    0.23

Actual Performance under modified Non-GAAP metric used for purposes of funding of 2022 AIP

    7.20

2023 PROXY STATEMENT        A-1


LOGOLOGO

 

SLM CORPORATION

ATTN: CORPORATE SECRETARY

300 CONTINENTAL DRIVE

NEWARK, DE 19713

  

SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE [ QR Barcode ]

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting—Go towww.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, the day before the meeting date for shares held directly. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web sitewebsite and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

During The Meeting—Go towww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020SLM2023

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BYPHONE—1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, the day before the meeting date for shares held directly. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

E35580-E35580-P00228                KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

P00228

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

        DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.                         

 

                   SLM CORPORATION

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:

1. Election of Directors

  Nominees:

ForAgainstAbstain
1a.     R. Scott Blackley
1b.     Paul G. Child
1c.     Mary Carter Warren Franke
1d.     Marianne M. Keler
1e.     Mark L. Lavelle
1f.      Ted Manvitz
1g.     Jim Matheson
1h.     Samuel T. Ramsey
1i.      Vivian C. Schneck-Last
1j.      Robert S. Strong

       SLM CORPORATION

            
    ForAgainstAbstain

1k.   Jonathan W. Witter

1l.    Kirsten O. Wolberg

2.     Advisory approval of SLM Corporation’s executive compensation.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote

1 YEAR for the following proposal:
  
    1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
3.     Advisory approval of the frequency of future advisory votes on SLM Corporation’s executive compensation.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:proposal:  
    

1.  Election of Directors

For
  Against  Abstain    

Nominees:

For

Against

Abstain

  

1a.     Paul G. Child

ForAgainstAbstain

1b.     Mary Carter Warren Franke

        1k.    Jonathan W. Witter

1c.     Earl A. Goode

        1l.    Kirsten O. Wolberg

1d.     Marianne M. Keler

2.     Advisory approval of SLM Corporation’s executive compensation.

1e.     Mark L. Lavelle

3.4.     Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as SLM Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.

2023.
  

  

  

1f.      Jim Matheson

    

1g.     Frank C. Puleo

  

1h.     Vivian C. Schneck-Last

1i.      William N. Shiebler

NOTE: This proxy is revocable and the shares represented by this proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, the proxy will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends. If any other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof, the persons named in this proxy will vote in their discretion.

  
 

1j.      Robert S. Strong

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

 
     
 
 

       

       
 

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

 

Date

 

  

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

 

Date

 

  


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Form10-K are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

PLEASE VOTE, SIGN, AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY

IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards, and annual reports electronically viae-mail email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION,

q DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. q

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E35581-P00228

SLM CORPORATION

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

June 18, 2020 11:20, 2023 1:00 AMPM Eastern Daylight Time

Via the Internet atwww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SLM2020SLM2023

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Nicolas Jafarieh and Richard M. Nelson or each of them, each with full power of substitution, as the lawful attorneys and proxies of the undersigned to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of SLM Corporation to be held on June 18, 2020,20, 2023, and any adjournments or postponements thereof, to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present, and to vote in their discretion upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED BY THE STOCKHOLDER, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL PORTIONS OF PROPOSALS 1, 2, AND 4, “1 YEAR” FOR PROPOSAL 3, AND IN THE PROXY’S DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY COMING BEFORE THE MEETING.